IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v68y2022i4p2806-2823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalized Priority Policies in Call Centers Using Past Customer Interaction Information

Author

Listed:
  • Brett Alan Hathaway

    (Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21202;)

  • Seyed Morteza Emadi

    (Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)

  • Vinayak Deshpande

    (Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)

Abstract

To increase revenue or improve customer service, companies are increasingly personalizing their product or service offerings based on their customers' history of interactions. In this paper, we show how call centers can improve customer service by implementing personalized priority policies . Under personalized priority policies, managers use customer contact history to predict individual-level caller abandonment and redialing behavior and prioritize them based on these predictions to improve operational performance. We provide a framework for how companies can use individual-level customer history data to capture the idiosyncratic preferences and beliefs that impact caller abandonment and redialing behavior and quantify the improvements to operational performance of these policies by applying our framework using caller history data from a real-world call center. We achieve this by formulating a structural model that uses a Bayesian learning framework to capture how callers’ past waiting times and abandonment/redialing decisions affect their current abandonment and redialing behavior and use our data to impute the callers’ underlying primitives such as their rewards for service, waiting costs, and redialing costs. These primitives allow us to simulate caller behavior under a variety of personalized priority policies and hence, collect relevant operational performance measures. We find that, relative to the first-come, first-served policy, our proposed personalized priority policies have the potential to decrease average waiting times by up to 29% or increase system throughput by reducing the percentage of service requests lost to abandonment by up to 6.3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Brett Alan Hathaway & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Vinayak Deshpande, 2022. "Personalized Priority Policies in Call Centers Using Past Customer Interaction Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2806-2823, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:2806-2823
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itay Gurvich & Ward Whitt, 2009. "Queue-and-Idleness-Ratio Controls in Many-Server Service Systems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 363-396, May.
    2. Rust, John, 1987. "Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(5), pages 999-1033, September.
    3. Peter E. Rossi & Robert E. McCulloch & Greg M. Allenby, 1996. "The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 321-340.
    4. Nikolay Osadchiy & Diwas KC, 2017. "Are Patients Patient? The Role of Time to Appointment in Patient Flow," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 469-490, March.
    5. J. Michael Harrison & Assaf Zeevi, 2004. "Dynamic Scheduling of a Multiclass Queue in the Halfin-Whitt Heavy Traffic Regime," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 243-257, April.
    6. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    7. Zeynep Akşin & Barış Ata & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Che-Lin Su, 2013. "Structural Estimation of Callers' Delay Sensitivity in Call Centers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2727-2746, December.
    8. Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane, 1996. "Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20.
    9. Ryan W. Buell & Dennis Campbell & Frances X. Frei, 2016. "How Do Customers Respond to Increased Service Quality Competition?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 585-607, October.
    10. Vijay Mehrotra & Kevin Ross & Geoff Ryder & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2012. "Routing to Manage Resolution and Waiting Time in Call Centers with Heterogeneous Servers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 66-81, January.
    11. Gad Allon & Awi Federgruen & Margaret Pierson, 2011. "How Much Is a Reduction of Your Customers' Wait Worth? An Empirical Study of the Fast-Food Drive-Thru Industry Based on Structural Estimation Methods," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 489-507, October.
    12. Avishai Mandelbaum & Uri Yechiali, 1983. "Optimal Entering Rules for a Customer with Wait Option at an M/G/1 Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 174-187, February.
    13. Samim Ghamami & Amy R. Ward, 2013. "Dynamic Scheduling of a Two-Server Parallel Server System with Complete Resource Pooling and Reneging in Heavy Traffic: Asymptotic Optimality of a Two-Threshold Policy," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 761-824, November.
    14. Gad Allon & Eran Hanany, 2012. "Cutting in Line: Social Norms in Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 493-506, March.
    15. Shiliang Cui & Xuanming Su & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2019. "A Model of Rational Retrials in Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1699-1718, November.
    16. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović, 2017. "Personalized queues: the customer view, via a fluid model of serving least-patient first," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 23-53, October.
    17. Luyi Yang & Laurens G. Debo & Varun Gupta, 2019. "Search Among Queues Under Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3605-3623, August.
    18. Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2015. "Waiting Patiently: An Empirical Study of Queue Abandonment in an Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 39-59, January.
    19. Jeunghyun Kim & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Amy R. Ward, 2018. "Dynamic Scheduling in a Many-Server, Multiclass System: The Role of Customer Impatience in Large Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 285-301, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Setareh Boshrouei Shargh & Mostafa Zandieh & Ashkan Ayough & Farbod Farhadi, 2024. "Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 754-783, June.
    2. Yahel Giat, 2024. "Stock Levels and Repair Sourcing in a Periodic Review Exchangeable Item Repair System," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brett A. Hathaway & Seyed M. Emadi & Vinayak Deshpande, 2021. "Don’t Call Us, We’ll Call You: An Empirical Study of Caller Behavior Under a Callback Option," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1508-1526, March.
    2. Christian Terwiesch & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats & Vishal Gaur, 2020. "OM Forum—A Review of Empirical Operations Management over the Last Two Decades," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 656-668, July.
    3. Shiliang Cui & Xuanming Su & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2019. "A Model of Rational Retrials in Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1699-1718, November.
    4. Jiayi Liu & Jingui Xie & Kum Khiong Yang & Zhichao Zheng, 2019. "Effects of Rescheduling on Patient No-Show Behavior in Outpatient Clinics," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 780-797, October.
    5. Jinsheng Chen & Jing Dong & Pengyi Shi, 2020. "A survey on skill-based routing with applications to service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 53-82, October.
    6. Andrew Ching & Susumu Imai & Masakazu Ishihara & Neelam Jain, 2012. "A practitioner’s guide to Bayesian estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 151-196, June.
    7. Yina Lu & Andrés Musalem & Marcelo Olivares & Ariel Schilkrut, 2013. "Measuring the Effect of Queues on Customer Purchases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(8), pages 1743-1763, August.
    8. Noa Zychlinski, 2023. "Applications of fluid models in service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 161-185, February.
    9. Ken Moon & Kostas Bimpikis & Haim Mendelson, 2018. "Randomized Markdowns and Online Monitoring," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1271-1290, March.
    10. Jianfu Wang & Ming Hu, 2020. "Efficient Inaccuracy: User-Generated Information Sharing in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4648-4666, October.
    11. Ruijie Zhang & Xiaohua Han & Rowan Wang & Jianghua Zhang & Yinghao Zhang, 2023. "Please don't make me wait! Influence of customers' waiting preference and no‐show behavior on appointment systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1597-1616, June.
    12. Teck-Hua Ho & Noah Lim & Sadat Reza & Xiaoyu Xia, 2017. "OM Forum—Causal Inference Models in Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 509-525, October.
    13. Baris Ata & Xiaoshan Peng, 2018. "An Equilibrium Analysis of a Multiclass Queue with Endogenous Abandonments in Heavy Traffic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 163-183, January.
    14. Jeunghyun Kim & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Amy R. Ward, 2018. "Dynamic Scheduling in a Many-Server, Multiclass System: The Role of Customer Impatience in Large Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 285-301, May.
    15. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    16. Andreas Lanz & Gregor Reich & Ole Wilms, 2022. "Adaptive grids for the estimation of dynamic models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 179-238, June.
    17. Dan Horsky & Sanjog Misra & Paul Nelson, 2006. "Observed and Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Brand-Choice Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 322-335, 07-08.
    18. Sandeep Rath & Kumar Rajaram, 2022. "Staff Planning for Hospitals with Implicit Cost Estimation and Stochastic Optimization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    19. Bolandifar, Ehsan & DeHoratius, Nicole & Olsen, Tava, 2023. "Modeling abandonment behavior among patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 243-254.
    20. Sang Won Kim & Marcelo Olivares & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2014. "Measuring the Performance of Large-Scale Combinatorial Auctions: A Structural Estimation Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1180-1201, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:2806-2823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.