IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v18y1972i11p620-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gradient Projection Method Along Geodesics

Author

Listed:
  • David G. Luenberger

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

The method of steepest descent for solving unconstrained minimization problems is well understood. It is known, for instance, that when applied to a smooth objective function f, and converging to a solution point x where the corresponding Hessian matrix F(x) is positive definite, the asymptotic rate of convergence is given by the Kantorovich ratio (\beta - \alpha ) 2 /(\beta + \alpha ) 2 , where \alpha and \beta are respectively the smallest and largest eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix F(x). This result is one of the major sharp results on convergence of minimization algorithms. In this paper a corresponding result is given for the gradient projection method for solving constrained minimization problems. It is shown that the asymptotic rate of convergence of gradient projection methods is also given by a Kantorovich ratio, but with \alpha and \beta being determined by the Lagrangian associated with the problem. Specifically, if L is the Hessian of the Lagrangian evaluated at the solution, \alpha and \beta are the smallest and largest eigenvalues of L when restricted to the subspace tangent to the constraint surface. This result is a natural extension of the one for unconstrained problems. Unlike the unconstrained situation where linear analysis is natural, the constrained situation is inherently nonlinear since analysis must be confined to the constraint surface. This technical difficulty would obscure the basic simplicity of the analysis if it were not for the introduction of the concept of geodesic descent which restores order to an otherwise potentially chaotic and unexciting analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • David G. Luenberger, 1972. "The Gradient Projection Method Along Geodesics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(11), pages 620-631, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:18:y:1972:i:11:p:620-631
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.18.11.620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.11.620
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.18.11.620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glaydston C. Bento & Orizon P. Ferreira & Jefferson G. Melo, 2017. "Iteration-Complexity of Gradient, Subgradient and Proximal Point Methods on Riemannian Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 548-562, May.
    2. Jing Wang & Huafei Sun & Simone Fiori, 2019. "Empirical Means on Pseudo-Orthogonal Groups," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Dewei Zhang & Sam Davanloo Tajbakhsh, 2023. "Riemannian Stochastic Variance-Reduced Cubic Regularized Newton Method for Submanifold Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 324-361, January.
    4. João Carlos de O. Souza, 2018. "Proximal Point Methods for Lipschitz Functions on Hadamard Manifolds: Scalar and Vectorial Cases," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 745-760, December.
    5. X. M. Wang & C. Li & J. C. Yao, 2015. "Subgradient Projection Algorithms for Convex Feasibility on Riemannian Manifolds with Lower Bounded Curvatures," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 202-217, January.
    6. Fiori, Simone, 2016. "A Riemannian steepest descent approach over the inhomogeneous symplectic group: Application to the averaging of linear optical systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 251-264.
    7. P.-A. Absil & I. Oseledets, 2015. "Low-rank retractions: a survey and new results," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 5-29, September.
    8. Teles A. Fernandes & Orizon P. Ferreira & Jinyun Yuan, 2017. "On the Superlinear Convergence of Newton’s Method on Riemannian Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 828-843, June.
    9. Y. Yang, 2007. "Globally Convergent Optimization Algorithms on Riemannian Manifolds: Uniform Framework for Unconstrained and Constrained Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 245-265, February.
    10. Glaydston Carvalho Bento & Sandro Dimy Barbosa Bitar & João Xavier Cruz Neto & Paulo Roberto Oliveira & João Carlos Oliveira Souza, 2019. "Computing Riemannian Center of Mass on Hadamard Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 977-992, December.
    11. Jingyang Zhou & Kok Teo & Di Zhou & Guohui Zhao, 2012. "Nonlinear optimal feedback control for lunar module soft landing," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 211-227, February.
    12. Erik Alex Papa Quiroz, 2024. "Proximal Point Method for Quasiconvex Functions in Riemannian Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 1268-1285, September.
    13. Orizon P. Ferreira & Mauricio S. Louzeiro & Leandro F. Prudente, 2020. "Iteration-Complexity and Asymptotic Analysis of Steepest Descent Method for Multiobjective Optimization on Riemannian Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 507-533, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:18:y:1972:i:11:p:620-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.