IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v48y2018i5p449-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Cynthia Rudin

    (Departments of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Berk Ustun

    (Center for Research in Computation for Society, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138)

Abstract

Questions of trust in machine-learning models are becoming increasingly important as these tools are starting to be used widely for high-stakes decisions in medicine and criminal justice. Transparency of models is a key aspect affecting trust. This paper reveals that there is new technology to build transparent machine-learning models that are often as accurate as black-box machine-learning models. These methods have already had an impact in medicine and criminal justice. This work calls into question the overall need for black-box models in these applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun, 2018. "Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 449-466, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:48:y:2018:i:5:p:449-466
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2018.0957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0957
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2018.0957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen F Weng & Jenna Reps & Joe Kai & Jonathan M Garibaldi & Nadeem Qureshi, 2017. "Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Hoffman, Peter B., 1994. "Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 477-494.
    3. Jiaming Zeng & Berk Ustun & Cynthia Rudin, 2017. "Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 689-722, June.
    4. N. Tollenaar & P. G. M. van der Heijden, 2013. "Which method predicts recidivism best?: a comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(2), pages 565-584, February.
    5. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "The Optimization Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 107-134, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramos Maqueda,Manuel & Chen,Daniel Li, 2021. "The Role of Justice in Development : The Data Revolution," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9720, The World Bank.
    2. Shany Azaria & Boaz Ronen & Noam Shamir, 2024. "Alleviating Court Congestion: The Case of the Jerusalem District Court," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 267-281, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaming Zeng & Berk Ustun & Cynthia Rudin, 2017. "Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 689-722, June.
    2. Wang, Yongli & Wang, Yudong & Huang, Yujing & Yang, Jiale & Ma, Yuze & Yu, Haiyang & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Fuwei & Zhang, Yanfu, 2019. "Operation optimization of regional integrated energy system based on the modeling of electricity-thermal-natural gas network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Yang, Lin & Pang, Shujiang & Wang, Xiaoyan & Du, Yi & Huang, Jieyu & Melching, Charles S., 2021. "Optimal allocation of best management practices based on receiving water capacity constraints," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Wang, Yongli & Li, Jiapu & Wang, Shuo & Yang, Jiale & Qi, Chengyuan & Guo, Hongzhen & Liu, Ximei & Zhang, Hongqing, 2020. "Operational optimization of wastewater reuse integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Changyu Zhou & Guohe Huang & Jiapei Chen, 2019. "A Type-2 Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Fractional Integrated Modeling Method for Energy System Management of Uncertainties and Risks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Hu, Lin & Hu, Xiaosong & Che, Yunhong & Feng, Fei & Lin, Xianke & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2020. "Reliable state of charge estimation of battery packs using fuzzy adaptive federated filtering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Hao, Ran & Lu, Tianguang & Ai, Qian & Wang, Zhe & Wang, Xiaolong, 2020. "Distributed online learning and dynamic robust standby dispatch for networked microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. Salvatore Tedesco & Martina Andrulli & Markus Åkerlund Larsson & Daniel Kelly & Antti Alamäki & Suzanne Timmons & John Barton & Joan Condell & Brendan O’Flynn & Anna Nordström, 2021. "Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Mortality Prediction in a Prospective Cohort of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Li, Yang & Wang, Bin & Yang, Zhen & Li, Jiazheng & Chen, Chen, 2022. "Hierarchical stochastic scheduling of multi-community integrated energy systems in uncertain environments via Stackelberg game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    11. Qiaohua Fang & Xuezhe Wei & Haifeng Dai, 2019. "A Remaining Discharge Energy Prediction Method for Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Considering SOC and Parameter Inconsistency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Ming Zhang & Qianwen Huang & Sihan Liu & Huiying Li, 2019. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Aircraft Taxiing on the Airport Surface with Consideration to Taxiing Conflicts and the Airport Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Ruidi Chen & Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis, 2022. "Robust Grouped Variable Selection Using Distributionally Robust Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 1042-1071, September.
    14. Darya Pyatkina & Tamara Shcherbina & Vadim Samusenkov & Irina Razinkina & Mariusz Sroka, 2021. "Modeling and Management of Power Supply Enterprises’ Cash Flows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Kumar Jadoun, Vinay & Rahul Prashanth, G & Suhas Joshi, Siddharth & Narayanan, K. & Malik, Hasmat & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2022. "Optimal fuzzy based economic emission dispatch of combined heat and power units using dynamically controlled Whale Optimization Algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    16. Mohammed Abdullah H. Alshehri & Youguang Guo & Gang Lei, 2023. "Energy Management Strategies of Grid-Connected Microgrids under Different Reliability Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Ye, Rui-Ke & Gao, Zhuang-Fei & Fang, Kai & Liu, Kang-Li & Chen, Jia-Wei, 2021. "Moving from subsidy stimulation to endogenous development: A system dynamics analysis of China's NEVs in the post-subsidy era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Ying Wang & Zhicheng Du & Wayne R. Lawrence & Yun Huang & Yu Deng & Yuantao Hao, 2019. "Predicting Hepatitis B Virus Infection Based on Health Examination Data of Community Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Meng, Jinhao & Cai, Lei & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan & Luo, Guangzhao & Sui, Xin & Teodorescu, Remus, 2019. "Lithium-ion battery state-of-health estimation in electric vehicle using optimized partial charging voltage profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1054-1062.
    20. Theodoros Kalogiannis & Md Sazzad Hosen & Mohsen Akbarzadeh Sokkeh & Shovon Goutam & Joris Jaguemont & Lu Jin & Geng Qiao & Maitane Berecibar & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2019. "Comparative Study on Parameter Identification Methods for Dual-Polarization Lithium-Ion Equivalent Circuit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-35, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:48:y:2018:i:5:p:449-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.