IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v22y1994i6p477-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score

Author

Listed:
  • Hoffman, Peter B.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoffman, Peter B., 1994. "Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 477-494.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:22:y:1994:i:6:p:477-494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-2352(94)90090-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giguère, Guy & Lussier, Patrick, 2016. "Debunking the psychometric properties of the LS\CMI: An application of item response theory with a risk assessment instrument," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 207-218.
    2. Holsinger, Alexander M. & Lowenkamp, Christopher T. & Latessa, Edward J., 2006. "Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 331-337.
    3. Turpin-Petrosino, Carolyn, 1999. "Are limiting enactments effective? an experimental test of decision making in a presumptive parole state," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 321-332, July.
    4. Schwaner, Shawn L., 2000. ""Stick 'em up, buddy": robbery, lifestyle, and specialization within a cohort of parolees," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 371-384.
    5. Jiaming Zeng & Berk Ustun & Cynthia Rudin, 2017. "Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 689-722, June.
    6. Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun, 2018. "Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 449-466, October.
    7. Hoffman, Peter B. & Beck, James L., 2005. "Revocation by consent: The United States Parole Commission's expedited revocation procedure," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 451-462.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:22:y:1994:i:6:p:477-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.