IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v33y2003i5p83-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OR/MS Content and Visibility in AACSB-Accredited US Business Programs

Author

Listed:
  • M. David Albritton

    (Department of Management, College of Business, 401 Lowder Business Building, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849)

  • Patrick R. McMullen

    (Babcock Graduate School of Management, PO Box 7659, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109)

  • Lorraine R. Gardiner

    (Accounting and Management Information Systems, College of Business, California State University, Chico, California 95929-0011)

Abstract

In 1997, an INFORMS task force published the results of a study measuring the damage done to operations research/management science (OR/MS) content in business schools after the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) removed OR/MS from its requirements in 1991. Their results were not encouraging. To investigate the current status of OR/MS, we conducted two related analyses to profile both the overall visibility of OR/MS in AACSB-accredited business schools and the content and delivery of existing MBA courses. Our results show small visibility (less than 10 percent) in terms of departments, programs, and concentrations. Approximately 40 percent of the schools studied, however, show one or more courses devoted to OR/MS. We found evidence of widespread use of computer modeling in MBA courses by both instructors and students. MBA students, however, appear to have low levels of involvement in constructing OR/MS applications and presenting their results. Finally, we found instructors' attitudinal responses regarding their MBA teaching experiences to be remarkably positive.

Suggested Citation

  • M. David Albritton & Patrick R. McMullen & Lorraine R. Gardiner, 2003. "OR/MS Content and Visibility in AACSB-Accredited US Business Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 83-89, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:33:y:2003:i:5:p:83-89
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.33.5.83.19254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.5.83.19254
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.33.5.83.19254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 1999. "The Teachers' Forum: Breaking the Mold—A New Approach to Teaching the First MBA Course in Management Science," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 99-116, August.
    2. Gamini Gunawardane, 1991. "Trends in Teaching Management Science in Undergraduate Business Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 16-21, October.
    3. Stephen G. Powell, 1998. "The Teachers' Forum: Requiem for the Management Science Course?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 111-117, April.
    4. Charles Gallagher, 1991. "First Courses in MS/OR in Executive MBA Programs: A Survey," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 79-83, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Legaki, Nikoletta-Zampeta & Karpouzis, Kostas & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Hamari, Juho, 2021. "Gamification to avoid cognitive biases: An experiment of gamifying a forecasting course," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stewart Robinson & Maureen Meadows & John Mingers & Frances A. O'Brien & Estelle A. Shale & Stephanie Stray, 2003. "Teaching OR/MS to MBAs at Warwick Business School: A Turnaround Story," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 67-76, April.
    2. Peter J. Regan, 2006. "Professional Decision Modeling: Practitioner as Professor," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 142-149, April.
    3. James Corner & Patricia Doyle Corner, 2003. "Teaching OR/MS Using Discussion Leadership," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 60-69, June.
    4. H. Brian Hwarng, 2001. "A Modern Simulation Course for Business Students," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 66-75, June.
    5. Thomas A. Grossman, 2002. "Student Consulting Projects Benefit Faculty and Industry," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 42-48, April.
    6. Valerie Belton & Helyn Thornbury Gould & John L. Scott, 2006. "Developing the Reflective Practitioner---Designing an Undergraduate Class," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 150-164, April.
    7. Susan Garner Garille & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "Stigler's Diet Problem Revisited," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Suzanne de Treville & Ann van Ackere, 2006. "Equipping Students to Reduce Lead Times: The Role of Queuing-Theory-Based Modeling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 165-173, April.
    9. Matthew J. Drake, 2019. "Teaching OR/MS with Cases: A Review and New Suggestions," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 57-66, January.
    10. David M. Tulett & Ginger Y. Ke, 2023. "Using LINGO for Business Students," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Kala Chand Seal & Zbigniew H. Przasnyski, 2003. "Using Technology to Support Pedagogy in an OR/MS Course," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 27-40, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Professional: OR/MS education.;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:33:y:2003:i:5:p:83-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.