IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v36y2006i2p165-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equipping Students to Reduce Lead Times: The Role of Queuing-Theory-Based Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne de Treville

    (HEC--University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland)

  • Ann van Ackere

    (HEC--University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland)

Abstract

Time is power. A company that gets products to its customers faster than its competitors strengthens its market position; therefore management students should learn how to reduce lead times. The counterintuitive mathematical principles that drive lead time and the complex system dynamics of operations management make the skills of reducing lead times difficult to teach. Mathematical modeling (queuing-theory or simulation-based) is an effective tool for teaching these skills. In evaluating modeling approaches in the classroom, it is important to consider model quality and student affective outcomes, such as motivation and empowerment. Queuing-theory-based models increase students’ abilities to reduce lead times more than simulation-based models. Using a classic teaching case, we compare the two approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne de Treville & Ann van Ackere, 2006. "Equipping Students to Reduce Lead Times: The Role of Queuing-Theory-Based Modeling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 165-173, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:36:y:2006:i:2:p:165-173
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1050.0188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0188
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1050.0188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kala Chand Seal & Zbigniew H. Przasnyski, 2003. "Using Technology to Support Pedagogy in an OR/MS Course," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 27-40, August.
    2. Stephen G. Powell, 1997. "The Teachers' Forum: From Intelligent Consumer to Active Modeler, Two MBA Success Stories," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 88-98, June.
    3. Stephen G. Powell, 1998. "The Teachers' Forum: Requiem for the Management Science Course?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 111-117, April.
    4. Stephen G. Powell, 1995. "The Teachers’ Forum: Teaching the Art of Modeling to MBA Students," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 88-94, June.
    5. Gary N. Powell, 1976. "Implementation of OR/MS In Government and Industry: A Behavioral Science Perspective," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 83-89, August.
    6. Rajan Suri & Gregory W. W. Diehl & Suzanne de Treville & Michael J. Tomsicek, 1995. "From CAN-Q to MPX: Evolution of Queuing Software for Manufacturing," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 128-150, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jahangirian, Mohsen & Eldabi, Tillal & Naseer, Aisha & Stergioulas, Lampros K. & Young, Terry, 2010. "Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter J. Regan, 2006. "Professional Decision Modeling: Practitioner as Professor," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 142-149, April.
    2. Thomas A. Grossman, 2002. "Student Consulting Projects Benefit Faculty and Industry," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 42-48, April.
    3. Stewart Robinson & Maureen Meadows & John Mingers & Frances A. O'Brien & Estelle A. Shale & Stephanie Stray, 2003. "Teaching OR/MS to MBAs at Warwick Business School: A Turnaround Story," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 67-76, April.
    4. Kala Chand Seal & Zbigniew H. Przasnyski, 2003. "Using Technology to Support Pedagogy in an OR/MS Course," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 27-40, August.
    5. H. Brian Hwarng, 2001. "A Modern Simulation Course for Business Students," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 66-75, June.
    6. Allan W. Gray & Joshua D. Detre & Brian C. Briggeman, 2005. "Valuing Limited Information in Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Working Papers 05-02, Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. Briggeman, Brian C. & Detre, Joshua D. & Gray, Allan W., 2004. "Compound Options: A Real Options Application To An Agricultural Business," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19996, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Valerie Belton & Helyn Thornbury Gould & John L. Scott, 2006. "Developing the Reflective Practitioner---Designing an Undergraduate Class," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 150-164, April.
    9. Brian C. Briggeman & Allan W. Gray & Joshua D. Detre, 2008. "Using Limited Information to Support the Decision to Launch a New Product in the Fruit Juice Market: A Teaching Case Study," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 370-378.
    10. Akash Dania & Bridget Anakwe & Bernadette Ruf, 2019. "Student Preference for Spreadsheet-Based Learning," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Anton Ovchinnikov & Joseph Milner, 2008. "Spreadsheet Model Helps to Assign Medical Residents at the University of Vermont's College of Medicine," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 311-323, August.
    12. Lin, Yu-Hsin & Lee, Ching-En, 2001. "A total standard WIP estimation method for wafer fabrication," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 78-94, May.
    13. M. David Albritton & Patrick R. McMullen & Lorraine R. Gardiner, 2003. "OR/MS Content and Visibility in AACSB-Accredited US Business Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 83-89, October.
    14. Thomas A. Grossman, 1999. "Teachers' Forum: Spreadsheet Modeling and Simulation Improves Understanding of Queues," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 88-103, June.
    15. T R Willemain & S G Powell, 2007. "How novices formulate models. Part II: a quantitative description of behaviour," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(10), pages 1271-1283, October.
    16. Larry J. LeBlanc & Michael R. Galbreth, 2007. "Implementing Large-Scale Optimization Models in Excel Using VBA," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 370-382, August.
    17. Briggeman, Brian C. & Gunderson, Michael A. & Detre, Joshua D., 2006. "Protecting Your Turf: First-mover Advantages as a Barrier to Competitor Innovation," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18.
    18. Thomas A. Grossman & Vijay Mehrotra & Mouwafac Sidaoui, 2016. "A Student-Centered Approach to the Business School Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 42-53, January.
    19. Stephen G. Powell, 1998. "The Teachers' Forum: Requiem for the Management Science Course?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 111-117, April.
    20. Daniel Fylstra & Leon Lasdon & John Watson & Allan Waren, 1998. "Design and Use of the Microsoft Excel Solver," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 29-55, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:36:y:2006:i:2:p:165-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.