IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i2p1207-1223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surgery Sequencing Coordination with Recovery Resource Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Bai

    (Department of Operations and Information Management, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269)

  • Robert H. Storer

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015)

  • Gregory L. Tonkay

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015)

Abstract

Surgical practice administrators need to determine the sequence of surgeries and reserved operating room (OR) time for each surgery in the surgery scheduling process. Both decisions require coordination among multiple ORs and the recovery resource in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) in a surgical suite. Although existing studies have addressed OR time reservation, surgery sequencing coordination is an open challenge in the stochastic surgical environment. In this paper, we propose an algorithmic solution to this problem based on stochastic optimization. The proposed methodology involves the development of a surrogate objective function that is highly correlated with the original one. The resulting surrogate model has network-structured subproblems after Lagrangian relaxation and decomposition, which makes it easier to solve than the impractically difficult original problem. We show that our proposed approach finds near-optimal solutions in small instances and outperforms benchmark methods by 13%–51% or equivalently an estimated saving of $760–$7,420 per day in surgical suites with 4–10 ORs. Our results illustrate a mechanism to alleviate congestion in the PACU. We also recommend that practice administrators prioritize sequencing coordination over the optimization of OR time reservation in an effort for performance improvement. Furthermore, we demonstrate how administrators should consider the impact of sequencing decisions when making strategic capacity adjustments for the PACU. Summary of Contribution: Our work provides an algorithmic solution to an open question in the field of healthcare operations management. This solution approach involves formulating a surrogate optimization model and exploiting its decomposability and network-structure. In computational experiments, we quantitatively benchmark its performance and assess its benefits. Our numerical results provide unique managerial insights for healthcare leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Bai & Robert H. Storer & Gregory L. Tonkay, 2022. "Surgery Sequencing Coordination with Recovery Resource Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 1207-1223, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:1207-1223
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    2. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    3. Mehmet A. Begen & Maurice Queyranne, 2011. "Appointment Scheduling with Discrete Random Durations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 240-257, May.
    4. Jeff Linderoth & Alexander Shapiro & Stephen Wright, 2006. "The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 215-241, February.
    5. Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Jiawei Zhang, 2014. "Sequencing Appointments for Service Systems Using Inventory Approximations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 251-262, May.
    6. Lee, Sangbok & Yih, Yuehwern, 2014. "Reducing patient-flow delays in surgical suites through determining start-times of surgical cases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 620-629.
    7. Sujin Kim & Raghu Pasupathy & Shane G. Henderson, 2015. "A Guide to Sample Average Approximation," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 207-243, Springer.
    8. Miao Bai & Robert H. Storer & Gregory L. Tonkay, 2017. "A sample gradient-based algorithm for a multiple-OR and PACU surgery scheduling problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 367-380, April.
    9. Camilo Mancilla & Robert Storer, 2012. "A sample average approximation approach to stochastic appointment sequencing and scheduling," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 655-670.
    10. Saremi, Alireza & Jula, Payman & ElMekkawy, Tarek & Wang, G. Gary, 2013. "Appointment scheduling of outpatient surgical services in a multistage operating room department," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 646-658.
    11. Vernon Ning Hsu & Renato de Matta & Chung‐Yee Lee, 2003. "Scheduling patients in an ambulatory surgical center," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(3), pages 218-238, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2024. "Wasserstein distributionally robust surgery scheduling with elective and emergency patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 509-522.
    2. Ankit Bansal & Jean-Philippe Richard & Bjorn P. Berg & Yu-Li Huang, 2024. "A Sequential Follower Refinement Algorithm for Robust Surgery Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 918-937, May.
    3. Wang, Lien & Demeulemeester, Erik & Vansteenkiste, Nancy & Rademakers, Frank E., 2024. "Capacity and surgery partitioning: An approach for improving surgery scheduling in the inpatient surgical department," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 112-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    2. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    3. Yifei Sun & Usha Nandini Raghavan & Vikrant Vaze & Christopher S Hall & Patricia Doyle & Stacey Sullivan Richard & Christoph Wald, 2021. "Stochastic programming for outpatient scheduling with flexible inpatient exam accommodation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 460-481, September.
    4. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Cohn, Amy E.M. & Epelman, Marina A., 2019. "Analysis of models for the Stochastic Outpatient Procedure Scheduling Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 721-731.
    5. Nur Banu Demir & Serhat Gul & Melih Çelik, 2021. "A stochastic programming approach for chemotherapy appointment scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 112-133, February.
    6. Çelik, Batuhan & Gul, Serhat & Çelik, Melih, 2023. "A stochastic programming approach to surgery scheduling under parallel processing principle," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović & Nikolaos Trichakis & Sarah Kadish & Ryan Leib & Craig A. Bunnell, 2020. "Data-Driven Appointment-Scheduling Under Uncertainty: The Case of an Infusion Unit in a Cancer Center," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 243-270, January.
    8. Serhat Gul, 2018. "A Stochastic Programming Approach for Appointment Scheduling Under Limited Availability of Surgery Turnover Teams," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 277-288, September.
    9. Karmel S. Shehadeh & Amy E. M. Cohn & Ruiwei Jiang, 2021. "Using stochastic programming to solve an outpatient appointment scheduling problem with random service and arrival times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 89-111, February.
    10. van Eekelen, Wouter, 2023. "Distributionally robust views on queues and related stochastic models," Other publications TiSEM 9b99fc05-9d68-48eb-ae8c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Jiang, Bowen & Tang, Jiafu & Yan, Chongjun, 2019. "A stochastic programming model for outpatient appointment scheduling considering unpunctuality," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 70-82.
    12. T. Meersman & B. Maenhout, 2022. "Multi-objective optimisation for constructing cyclic appointment schedules for elective and urgent patients," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 909-948, May.
    13. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Carlo Banditori & Daniele Feo, 2019. "Evaluating the long-term effects of appointment scheduling policies in a magnetic resonance imaging setting," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 212-254, March.
    14. Huaxin Qiu & Dujuan Wang & Yanzhang Wang & Yunqiang Yin, 2019. "MRI appointment scheduling with uncertain examination time," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 62-82, January.
    15. Bing Wang & Xingbao Han & Xianxia Zhang & Shaohua Zhang, 2015. "Predictive-reactive scheduling for single surgical suite subject to random emergency surgery," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 949-966, November.
    16. Wu, Xueqi & Zhou, Shenghai, 2022. "Sequencing and scheduling appointments on multiple servers with stochastic service durations and customer arrivals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Jiawei Zhang, 2015. "Appointment Scheduling with Limited Distributional Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 316-334, February.
    18. Christos Zacharias & Michael Pinedo, 2017. "Managing Customer Arrivals in Service Systems with Multiple Identical Servers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 639-656, October.
    19. Alex Kuiper & Robert H. Lee, 2022. "Appointment Scheduling for Multiple Servers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7422-7440, October.
    20. Reihaneh, Mohammad & Ansari, Sina & Farhadi, Farbod, 2023. "Patient appointment scheduling at hemodialysis centers: An exact branch and price approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 35-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:1207-1223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.