IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v37y2019i1d10.1007_s10878-017-0210-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MRI appointment scheduling with uncertain examination time

Author

Listed:
  • Huaxin Qiu

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Dujuan Wang

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Yanzhang Wang

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Yunqiang Yin

    (Kunming University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This paper addresses the appointment scheduling problem for a single diagnostic facility—the magnetic resonance imaging equipment, which provides several services to the appointed patients. The examinations have random service durations given by a joint discrete probability distribution. We consider two performance criteria: (1) the expected cost incurred from the equipment idle time and the examination overtime representing the operating costs of the hospital; and (2) the expected cost incurred from the patient waiting time reflecting the customer satisfaction. The overall goal is to identify the examination sequence and the scheduled start times for the appointed patients so as to minimize simultaneously the aforementioned criteria by determining all the Pareto-optimal schedules. The problem is first formulated as a two-stage stochastic integer programming model and it is shown to be NP-hard in the strong sense even for the case with only two scenarios. An improved multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is then proposed in the MOEA/D framework, where the uncertainty is simulated by constructing a number of different scenarios. To replace the time-consuming simulations during the process of evaluating the rescheduling cost, we integrate the algorithm with a support vector regression surrogate model which efficiently improves the robustness of the baseline schedule and the quality of the solution. Finally, using the real medical data, we assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model by comparing with the classical NSGA-II and the MOEA/D algorithm, and extract some appropriate management inspirations to medical staffs for decision-making references.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaxin Qiu & Dujuan Wang & Yanzhang Wang & Yunqiang Yin, 2019. "MRI appointment scheduling with uncertain examination time," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 62-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:37:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-017-0210-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-017-0210-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-017-0210-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-017-0210-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Gartner, 2014. "Scheduling the Hospital-Wide Flow of Elective Patients," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Optimizing Hospital-wide Patient Scheduling, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 33-54, Springer.
    2. Zheng Zhang & Xiaolan Xie, 2015. "Simulation-based optimization for surgery appointment scheduling of multiple operating rooms," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 998-1012, September.
    3. Brian Denton & James Viapiano & Andrea Vogl, 2007. "Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 13-24, February.
    4. Sakine Batun & Brian T. Denton & Todd R. Huschka & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2011. "Operating Room Pooling and Parallel Surgery Processing Under Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 220-237, May.
    5. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    6. E D Güneş & H Yaman & B Çekyay & V Verter, 2014. "Matching patient and physician preferences in designing a primary care facility network," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(4), pages 483-496, April.
    7. Miao Bai & Robert H. Storer & Gregory L. Tonkay, 2017. "A sample gradient-based algorithm for a multiple-OR and PACU surgery scheduling problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 367-380, April.
    8. Astaraky, Davood & Patrick, Jonathan, 2015. "A simulation based approximate dynamic programming approach to multi-class, multi-resource surgical scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 309-319.
    9. Camilo Mancilla & Robert Storer, 2012. "A sample average approximation approach to stochastic appointment sequencing and scheduling," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 655-670.
    10. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    11. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    12. Saremi, Alireza & Jula, Payman & ElMekkawy, Tarek & Wang, G. Gary, 2013. "Appointment scheduling of outpatient surgical services in a multistage operating room department," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 646-658.
    13. Ying Yang & Bing Shen & Wei Gao & Yong Liu & Liwei Zhong, 2015. "A surgical scheduling method considering surgeons’ preferences," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1016-1026, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuanzhu Fan & Jiafu Tang & Chongjun Yan & Hainan Guo & Zhongfa Cao, 2021. "Outpatient appointment scheduling problem considering patient selection behavior: data modeling and simulation optimization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 677-699, November.
    2. Xuanzhu Fan & Jiafu Tang & Chongjun Yan & Hainan Guo & Zhongfa Cao, 0. "Outpatient appointment scheduling problem considering patient selection behavior: data modeling and simulation optimization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    2. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    4. Karsten Schwarz & Michael Römer & Taïeb Mellouli, 2019. "A data-driven hierarchical MILP approach for scheduling clinical pathways: a real-world case study from a German university hospital," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 597-636, December.
    5. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C., 2020. "Surgical scheduling under uncertainty by approximate dynamic programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Çelik, Batuhan & Gul, Serhat & Çelik, Melih, 2023. "A stochastic programming approach to surgery scheduling under parallel processing principle," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Azar, Macarena & Carrasco, Rodrigo A. & Mondschein, Susana, 2022. "Dealing with uncertain surgery times in operating room scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 377-394.
    8. Wang, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2019. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for surgery block allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 740-753.
    9. Gökalp, E. & Gülpınar, N. & Doan, X.V., 2023. "Dynamic surgery management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 832-844.
    10. Babak Akbarzadeh & Ghasem Moslehi & Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi & Broos Maenhout, 2020. "A diving heuristic for planning and scheduling surgical cases in the operating room department with nurse re-rostering," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 265-288, April.
    11. Anders Reenberg Andersen & Thomas Jacob Riis Stidsen & Line Blander Reinhardt, 2020. "Simulation-Based Rolling Horizon Scheduling for Operating Theatres," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Javiera Barrera & Rodrigo A. Carrasco & Susana Mondschein & Gianpiero Canessa & David Rojas-Zalazar, 2020. "Operating room scheduling under waiting time constraints: the Chilean GES plan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 501-527, March.
    13. Gerami Farzad & Saidi Mehrabad Mohammad, 2016. "A Stochastic Surgery Sequencing Model Considering the Moral and Human Virtues," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 1-68, September.
    14. Tsai, Shing Chih & Yeh, Yingchieh & Kuo, Chen Yun, 2021. "Efficient optimization algorithms for surgical scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 579-593.
    15. Roland Braune & Walter J. Gutjahr & Petra Vogl, 2022. "Stochastic radiotherapy appointment scheduling," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1239-1277, December.
    16. Vandenberghe, Mathieu & De Vuyst, Stijn & Aghezzaf, El-Houssaine & Bruneel, Herwig, 2019. "Surgery sequencing to minimize the expected maximum waiting time of emergent patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 971-982.
    17. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    19. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    20. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:37:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-017-0210-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.