IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v11y2020i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing With Accountability in Project Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Nikos Macheridis

    (Lund University, Lund, Sweden)

  • Johan Dergård

    (Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Lund, Sweden)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a framework to assess how project individuals deal with accountability in project selection. The framework is designed based on project selection and accountability literature and empirical data. Empirical data was collected through semi-structured interviews with project individuals working at organizations operating in information technology and working with information technology projects. This method was chosen since the authors considered it to be appropriate for providing a deeper understanding of social phenomena through enabling the researchers to explore the views, experiences and beliefs of motivations of project individuals on specific matters. The framework reveals that project individuals use multiple strategies to deal with accountability, depending on audience and on forms of accountability. How project individuals deal with accountabilities depends on how trust, transparency and legitimacy are embedded in the different principal-agent relationships and the context that the project individuals are involved in during the selection phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikos Macheridis & Johan Dergård, 2020. "Dealing With Accountability in Project Selection," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJITPM.2020010101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Indranil R. Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2007. "Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 579-595, May.
    2. Marc Lankhorst, 2005. "Enterprise Architecture at Work," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-27505-3, February.
    3. Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Karasev, Oleg & Meissner, Dirk, 2016. "Integrated roadmaps for strategic management and planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 153-166.
    4. Christof Gellweiler, 2019. "Collaboration of Solution Architects and Project Managers," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christof Gellweiler, 2020. "Connecting Enterprise Architecture and Project Portfolio Management: A Review and a Model for IT Project Alignment," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 99-114, January.
    2. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Martin, Andrew & Dmitriev, Dmitry & Akeroyd, John, 2010. "A resurgence of interest in Information Architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 6-12.
    4. Mohammad Reza Meigounpoory & Aliye Hashemi & Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi & Yousof Azizi, 2013. "Effective Factors In Nsd Process Of Iranian Active Science-Based Businesses In The Field Of Nutrition Counseling," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 10(4), pages 33-39, January.
    5. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2017. "Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 14-33.
    6. de Alcantara, Douglas Pedro & Martens, Mauro Luiz, 2019. "Technology Roadmapping (TRM): a systematic review of the literature focusing on models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 127-138.
    7. Ma³gorzata Pankowska, 2012. "Corporate architecture evaluation methods (Metody oceny architektur korporacyjnych)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(38), pages 167-183.
    8. Stefan Strecker & David Heise & Ulrich Frank, 2011. "RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 595-611, September.
    9. Emmanouil Ntanos & Gerasimos Dimitriou & Vassilis Bekiaris & Charalampos Vassiliou & Kostas Kalaboukas & Dimitris Askounis, 2018. "A model-driven software engineering workflow and tool architecture for servitised manufacturing," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 683-720, August.
    10. Beata Zatwarnicka-Madura & Dariusz Siemieniako & Ewa Glińska & Yauheniya Sazonenka, 2019. "Strategic and Operational Levels of CSR Marketing Communication for Sustainable Orientation of a Company: A Case Study from Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Yu, Xiang & Zhang, Ben, 2019. "Obtaining advantages from technology revolution: A patent roadmap for competition analysis and strategy planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 273-283.
    12. Pinto Claudio Jose & Anunciacao Pedro Fernandes, 2020. "European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 38-49, December.
    13. Esmaelian, Majid & Tavana, Madjid & Di Caprio, Debora & Ansari, Reza, 2017. "A multiple correspondence analysis model for evaluating technology foresight methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 188-205.
    14. Xu, Xiaobo & Zhang, Weiyong & Li, Ling, 2016. "The impact of technology type and life cycle on IT productivity variance: A contingency theoretical perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1193-1204.
    15. Cheryl Gaimon & Gülru F. Özkan & Karen Napoleon, 2011. "Dynamic Resource Capabilities: Managing Workforce Knowledge with a Technology Upgrade," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1560-1578, December.
    16. Nathasit Gerdsri & Boonkiart Iewwongcharoen & Kittichai Rajchamaha & Nisit Manotungvorapun & Jakapong Pongthanaisawan & Watcharin Witthayaweerasak, 2021. "Capability Assessment toward Sustainable Development of Business Incubators: Framework and Experience Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Landry, Sylvain & Beaulieu, Martin & Roy, Jacques, 2016. "Strategy deployment in healthcare services: A case study approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 429-437.
    18. Daim, Tugrul U. & Yoon, Byung-Sung & Lindenberg, John & Grizzi, Robert & Estep, Judith & Oliver, Terry, 2018. "Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 49-66.
    19. Stylianos Kavadias & Karl T. Ulrich, 2020. "Innovation and New Product Development: Reflections and Insights from the Research Published in the First 20 Years of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 84-92, January.
    20. Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Lazar Gitelman & Elena Magaril & Romen Magaril & Alexandra Aristova, 2017. "Risk Reduction Methods for Managing the Development of Regional Electric Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.