IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v10y2017i1p92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Leakage on Innovative Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Adaileh
  • Hasan Abu AlZeat

Abstract

Organizations share knowledge in order to achieve its strategic objectives and enhance innovative performance, most important business process and critical knowledge are subjected to unwanted leakage. This study focused on the aspects and concerns associated with knowledge sharing within and outside organizations. To achieve this objective, the study construct, validate, and test the structure equation modeling for knowledge sharing, knowledge leakage, and innovation performance. A survey was designed and the data were collected in 2015 from managers and owners of 600 industrial companies in KSA. The total responses were 276. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the constructs, then subjected to structure equation modeling to test hypothesis. Model fit parameters indicated normal fit and suitability as the research model. Finding indicated that knowledge leakage negatively mediate the positive impact of knowledge sharing on innovation performance, and some of leakage may be beneficial and have a positive impact, especially when sharing knowledge with customers and competitors in order to develop market innovation. Theoretical implication supplement few empirical studies that shown knowledge leakage as mediator leads to minimize positive results of knowledge sharing. Since KSA recently began the transition to knowledge economy, where much of knowledge sharing occurs dramatically, the study provides analytical framework for Managerial and practical implication about important aspects of knowledge sharing, the method and measures proposed by this study allow organizations to map, formalize and measure their knowledge activities, model can be applied in corporate level to identify the specific impact among organizational units and company's networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Adaileh & Hasan Abu AlZeat, 2017. "Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Leakage on Innovative Performance," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-92, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/64577/35795
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/64577
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad A. Al-Tit, 2016. "The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management and the Moderating Part of Organizational Culture between HRM Practices and Organizational Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 43-54, January.
    2. Gupta, Samir & Polonsky, Michael, 2014. "Inter-firm learning and knowledge-sharing in multinational networks: An outsourced organization's perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 615-622.
    3. Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn, 2003. "Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 514-528, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Changfeng & Hu, Qiying, 2020. "Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    2. Cindy Zawadzki, 2011. "L'évolution du fonctionnement de la PME lors de l'introduction du contrôle de gestion : leçons d'un échec," Post-Print hal-00650594, HAL.
    3. Pearsall, Matthew J. & Ellis, Aleksander P.J. & Stein, Jordan H., 2009. "Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 18-28, May.
    4. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    5. Lyu, Chongchong & Yang, Jianjun & Zhang, Feng & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Mu, Tian, 2020. "How do knowledge characteristics affect firm’s knowledge sharing intention in interfirm cooperation? An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-60.
    6. Daniel Leunbach & Truls Erikson & Max Rapp-Ricciardi, 2020. "Muddling through Akerlofian and Knightian uncertainty: The role of sociobehavioral integration, positive affective tone, and polychronicity," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 145-164, June.
    7. Dana B. Minbaeva, 2007. "Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 567-593, October.
    8. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Subsidiary managers’ knowledge mobilizations: Unpacking emergent knowledge flows," Post-Print hal-00864324, HAL.
    9. Garreau, Lionel, 2009. "L’apport du concept de sens à l’étude du fonctionnement des équipes projet : études de cas de développement de centres commerciaux chez Immochan," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/4385 edited by Romelaer, Pierre.
    10. Christian, Jessica Siegel & Christian, Michael S. & Pearsall, Matthew J. & Long, Erin C., 2017. "Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 62-89.
    11. Denice E. Welch & Lawrence S. Welch, 2008. "The importance of language in international knowledge transfer," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 339-360, May.
    12. Ho, Hillbun (Dixon) & Lu, Ruichang, 2015. "Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1026-1034.
    13. Sobia Mahmood, 2011. "An Empirical Investigation on Knowledge Workers Productivity in Telecom Sector of Pakistan," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(1), pages 27-38.
    14. Ali Rezaeian & Rouhollah Bagheri, 2018. "Modeling the Factors that Affect the Implementation of Knowledge Networks," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 56-67.
    15. Shenglei Pi & Weining Cai, 2017. "Individual knowledge sharing behavior in dynamic virtual communities: the perspectives of network effects and status competition," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Roman M. Sheremeta & Matthew W. McCarter, 2013. "You Can’t Put Old Wine in New Bottles: The Effect of Newcomers on Coordination in Groups," Working Papers 13-02, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    17. Gao, Yongling & Driouchi, Tarik, 2018. "Accounting for ambiguity and trust in partial outsourcing: A behavioral real options perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 93-104.
    18. Vanessa Conzon & Ruthanne Huising, 2024. "Devoted but Disconnected : Managing Role Conflict Through Interactional Control," Post-Print hal-04553331, HAL.
    19. Dusya Vera & Mary Crossan & Claus Rerup & Steve Werner, 2014. "‘Thinking Before Acting’ or ‘Acting Before Thinking’: Antecedents of Individual Action Propensity in Work Situations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 603-633, June.
    20. Matthias Brauer & Tomi Laamanen, 2014. "Workforce Downsizing and Firm Performance: An Organizational Routine Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(8), pages 1311-1333, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.