IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v12y2019i9p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatism as a Supportive Paradigm for the Mixed Research Approach: Conceptualizing the Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Stances of Pragmatism

Author

Listed:
  • Heba Maarouf

Abstract

The emergence of the mixed research approach has been accompanied by searching for a philosophy that legitimates mixing quantitative and qualitative methods in one research. Many researchers consider pragmatism as the most common philosophical justification for the mixed research approach; however, pragmatism is criticized as a philosophy in general and also as philosophical support for the mixed research approach especially for not addressing the differing assumptions of the quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Trying to overcome this criticism, the current research is mainly concerned with presenting pragmatism as a coherent, integrated paradigm by conceptualizing its ontological, epistemological and axiological stances. The researcher coins three new terminologies: the reality cycle, the double-faced knowledge, and the necessary bias principle. These philosophical stances combine both the quantitative and qualitative paradigms' points of view as two integrated, not conflicting philosophies.

Suggested Citation

  • Heba Maarouf, 2019. "Pragmatism as a Supportive Paradigm for the Mixed Research Approach: Conceptualizing the Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Stances of Pragmatism," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/40468/41677
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/40468
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai Ma, 2012. "Some philosophical considerations in using mixed methods in library and information science research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(9), pages 1859-1867, September.
    2. Jan Jonker & Bartjan W. Pennink, 2010. "The Essence of Methodology," Springer Books, in: The Essence of Research Methodology, chapter 0, pages 21-41, Springer.
    3. Lai Ma, 2012. "Some philosophical considerations in using mixed methods in library and information science research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(9), pages 1859-1867, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ogunlusi, Abiola, 2024. "Developing the Livestock Emergency Management Guidelines and Standards for Emergency Recovery in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 122437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Buyisani Dube & Duduzile Nkomo & Mpho Apadile-Thokweng, 2024. "Pragmatism: An Essential Philosophy for Mixed Methods Research in Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 1001-1010, March.
    3. John J. Oliver, 2023. "Scenario planning: Reflecting on cases of actionable knowledge," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuru Siraj & István Hágen & Afriyadi Cahyadi & Anita Tangl & Goshu Desalegn, 2022. "Linking Leadership to Employees Performance: The Mediating Role of Human Resource Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Daniel Owusu-Mensah & Ren Naifei & Lydia Brako & Priscilla Boateng & Williams Kweku Darkwah, 2020. "Analysis of Production System Management of Ghana¡¯s Food and Beverage Industry: Empirical evidence from Spare Parts Inventory Control, Production Quality and Maintenance Modeling," Journal of Food Industry, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 1-43, November.
    3. Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri & Miston Mapuranga & Tafadzwa Clementine Maramura & Ogochukwu I. Nzewi, 2019. "Navigating on the key drivers for a transition to a green economy: evidence from women entrepreneurs in South Africa," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1686-1703, December.
    4. Fadi Thabtah & Omar Gharaibeh & Rashid Al-Zubaidy, 2012. "Arabic Text Mining Using Rule Based Classification," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 1-10.
    5. Okolie, Ugochukwu Chinonso & Nwosu, Hyginus Emeka & Eneje, Beatrice Chinyere & Oluka, Beth N., 2019. "Reclaiming education: Rising above examination malpractices, and its contextual factors on study progress in Nigeria," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-56.
    6. Mihaela Paraschiva Luca & Ileana Tache, 2021. "Sustainability of Public Finance through the Lens of Transfer Prices and Their Associated Risks: An Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Sana Mumtaz, 2022. "Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1245-1259, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pragmatism; mixed research; the reality cycle; the double-faced knowledge; the necessary bias principle;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.