IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iab/iabmit/v29i4p630-655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Bestimmungsgründe der Beschäftigung in der Landwirtschaft : eine quantitative Analyse der kurzfristigen Anpassung der Größe und Struktur des Arbeitskräftebestandes der Landwirtschaft im früheren Bundesgebiet 1971 bis 1991 (The determining reasons of employment in the agri-cultural sector : a quantitative analysis of the short-term adjustment of the size and structure of the labour stock in the agricultural sector in the former Republic of Germany from 1971 to 1991)

Author

Listed:
  • Andermann, Gerhard
  • Schmitt, Günther

Abstract

"In literature of agricultural economics the view is frequently held that the structural change in the agricultural sector, in particular in the form of adjustment in the size and structure of the labour stock, follows economic determining factors to only a very limited extent, and therefore results in permanent imbalances of the factor input there. This theory was also renewed by a more recent OECD study (1994) and confirmed with a quantitative study of the agricultural labour market. This article presents the results of a far more detailed analysis of the annual changes in the labour stock which occurred between 1971 and 1991 in the western German agricultural sector. For this, firstly the development in the size and structure of the stock is shown and explained. It can be seen from this that the people employed in the agricultural sector form a very heterogeneous group, differing not only with respect to their main activities in the business, the household and in nonagricultural employment and with respect to them being members of the ownermanager's family, as family workers, as opposed to the (paid) workers from outside the family, but also among other things differing with regard to the duration of their activity in the agricultural sector as full- or part-time family workers or as permanent or non-permanent paid workers and in their function as owner-manager, farm successor or simply workers performing activities. In addition to this there is the fact that the age structure of those employed in agriculture is very unfavourable and that the proportion of women and in particular of low skilled people is very high. These characteristics also determine the possibilities of adjustment to changed agricultural economic and general economic basic conditions. The agricultural businesses in the former Republic of Germany are organised almost without exception as family businesses and are, in addition, usually run by the owner and the members of his family as so-called secondary businesses. This form of organisation is related to the factthat the steadily decreasing demand for workers in the agricultural sector is mainly covered by self-recruiting, there is therefore little inflow of nonagricultural workers. In contrast, however, workers from outside the family play a very slight role, although this is increasing relatively, if very slowly. Among the family workers and in particular the owner-managers, there is a higher than average proportion of older people, over 44 years of age, and if they are employed full-time in agriculture, they have little chance of taking up another job outside the agricultural sector. This means on the other hand that the annual changes in the number of places of work (businesses) and farm owners in agriculture is influenced in the main by the number of older family workers, including the farm owners, and the waged workers, because these leave the jobs principally due to their age and are only then replaced in some cases by younger family workers or waged workers. This means both that only younger workers have the choice between an agricultural and a non-agricultural job, and that they opt in favour of a part-time or full-time job outside the agricultural sector if the agricultural economic conditions deteriorate in particular in the form of a negative change of the sectoral terms of trade, or if there has been an increase in the wage rates outside the agricultural sector. In the regression analyses carried out, the place of work and the differentiated categories of worker according to sex and main type of work in the business or in the business and the household as well as outside the business were examined as dependent variables. One of the main results shown was that the annual movement of workers into and out of the agricultural sector does in fact react to changes in agricultural economic and the general economic conditions, so far as it does not concern workers whose age, lack of vocational training or family commitments (husbands or wives) prevent them from taking up a full- or part-time job outside the agricultural sector. All in all, however, the agricultural sector possesses only a marginal and constantly decreasing importance on the labour market, with regard to its role in both the supply and the demand of workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Andermann, Gerhard & Schmitt, Günther, 1996. "Die Bestimmungsgründe der Beschäftigung in der Landwirtschaft : eine quantitative Analyse der kurzfristigen Anpassung der Größe und Struktur des Arbeitskräftebestandes der Landwirtschaft im früheren B," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 29(4), pages 630-655.
  • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:29:i:4:p:630-655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doku.iab.de/mittab/1996/1996_4_MittAB_Andermann_Schmitt.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayal Kimhi, 1995. "Differential Human Capital Investments and the Choice of Successor in Family Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(3), pages 719-724.
    2. Chiappori, Pierre-Andre, 1992. "Collective Labor Supply and Welfare," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(3), pages 437-467, June.
    3. Schmitt, Günther, 1993. "Was ist eigentlich ein Vollerwerbsbetrieb und wie viele gibt es davon in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 42(02).
    4. Gardner, Bruce L, 1992. "Changing Economic Perspectives on the Farm Problem," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 62-101, March.
    5. Gary S. Becker, 1981. "A Treatise on the Family," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck81-1.
    6. David N. Laband & Bernard F. Lentz, 1983. "Occupational Inheritance in Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 311-314.
    7. Ramon E. Lopez, 1984. "Estimating Substitution and Expansion Effects Using a Profit Function Framework," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(3), pages 358-367.
    8. H. Fred Gale, 1993. "Why Did the Number of Young Farm Entrants Decline?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(1), pages 138-146.
    9. Heidhues, T., 1972. "Ursachen und Ausmaß der unzureichenden Faktormobilität in der Landwirtschaft," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 9.
    10. Schmitt, Günther & Andermann, Gerhard, 1996. "Agrarpreise und betrieblicher Strukturwandel in der Landwirtschaft," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 45(08-09).
    11. Henrichsmeyer, W., 1972. "Sektorale und regionale Strukturwandlungen in einer wachsenden Volkswirtschaft," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andermann, Gerhard & Schmitt, Günther, 1996. "Die Bestimmungsgründe der Beschäftigung in der Landwirtschaft : eine quantitative Analyse der kurzfristigen Anpassung der Größe und Struktur des Arbeitskräftebestandes der Landwirtschaft im früheren B," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 29(4), pages 630-655.
    2. Kota Ogasawara & Mizuki Komura, 2022. "Consequences of war: Japan’s demographic transition and the marriage market," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 1037-1069, July.
    3. Hossain, Mohammad A. & Tisdell, Clement A. & Ayon, Tonmoyee Hasan, 2012. "Does Workforce Participation Empower Women? Micro-Level Evidence from Urban Bangladesh," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 35(3), pages 51-78, September.
    4. Catherine Sofer & Claire Thibout, 2019. "Women’s investment in career and the household division of labour," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(60), pages 6535-6557, December.
    5. LaFave, Daniel & Thomas, Duncan, 2017. "Extended families and child well-being," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 52-65.
    6. Seth R. Gitter & Bradford L. Barham, 2008. "Women's Power, Conditional Cash Transfers, and Schooling in Nicaragua," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 22(2), pages 271-290, May.
    7. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    8. Marco Manacorda, 2006. "Child Labor and the Labor Supply of Other Household Members: Evidence from 1920 America," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1788-1801, December.
    9. Sayyid Salman Rizavi & Catherine Sofer, 2010. "Household Division of Labor : Is There Any Escape From Traditional Gender Roles ?," Post-Print halshs-00461494, HAL.
    10. Marcassa Stefania, 2013. "Divorce laws and divorce rate in the US," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 997-1035, August.
    11. Gustman, Alan L & Steinmeier, Thomas L, 2000. "Retirement in Dual-Career Families: A Structural Model," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(3), pages 503-545, July.
    12. Malapit, Hazel Jean L., 2012. "Why do spouses hide income?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 584-593.
    13. Agnes R. Quisumbing & John A. Maluccio, 2003. "Resources at Marriage and Intrahousehold Allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 65(3), pages 283-327, July.
    14. Eleftherios Giovanis & Oznur Ozdamar, 2019. "A Collective Household Labour Supply Model with Disability: Evidence from Iraq," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 209-225, June.
    15. Francesconi, Marco & Muthoo, Abhinay, 2003. "An Economic Model of Child Custody," IZA Discussion Papers 857, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Olena Hankivsk & Jane Friesen & Colleen Varcoe & Fiona MacPhail & Lorraine Greaves & Charmaine Spencer, 2004. "Expanding Economic Costing in Health Care: Values, Gender and Diversity," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 30(3), pages 257-282, September.
    17. Sara Cantillon & Bertrand Maître & Dorothy Watson, 2016. "Family Financial Management and Individual Deprivation," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 461-473, September.
    18. J. Gimenez-Nadal & Jose Molina, 2013. "Parents’ education as a determinant of educational childcare time," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 719-749, April.
    19. Bansak, Cynthia & Grossbard, Shoshana & Wong, Ho-Po Crystal, 2022. "Mothers’ caregiving during COVID: The impact of marital property laws on women’s labor force status," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    20. Bjerk, David & Han, Seungjin, 2007. "Assortative marriage and the effects of government homecare subsidy programs on gender wage and participation inequality," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 1135-1150, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:29:i:4:p:630-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.