IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v5y2015i12p109-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Key Contractor Factors Influencing Client Satisfaction Level in Dealing with Construction Project: an Empirical Study in Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Rahman
  • Yazan Alzubi

Abstract

Client satisfaction in construction industry can be defined as the ability of a contractor to meet the client expectations. A contractor must have a thorough understanding of client expectations and be able to satisfy these expectations. The outcomes of the construction projects can be evaluated in numerous ways. One of the methods is to measure the satisfaction of participants as represented by the differences between their expectations and perceptions. This measurement is used widely in construction as it promises benefits, such as the improvement of product delivery, and enhances services quality by identifying some necessary changes. Satisfaction measurement is gauged by evaluating the level of client satisfaction of construction performance. The measurement of client satisfaction is also based on the quality of the end product. This evaluation is used to encourage contractors to improve their performance to a required level and to ensure that the projects are delivered as expected in terms of time, budget and quality. This paper discusses client satisfaction attribute on contractor performance. The aim of this paper is to reach the most important factors influencing client satisfaction level of performance provided by contractor in Jordanian construction industry. The results shows that there are seven extremely important factor that have a significant affect in client satisfaction level and immediately need to improve namely (1)service quality (2)Communication skills (3)adherence to budget, (4)safety performance, (5)adherence to schedule, (6)sit personnel skills, and (7)management capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Rahman & Yazan Alzubi, 2015. "Exploring Key Contractor Factors Influencing Client Satisfaction Level in Dealing with Construction Project: an Empirical Study in Jordan," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(12), pages 109-126, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:12:p:109-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Exploring_Key_Contractor_Factors_Influencing_Client_Satisfaction_Level_in_Dealing_with_Construction_Project_an_Empirical_Study_in_Jordan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Exploring_Key_Contractor_Factors_Influencing_Client_Satisfaction_Level_in_Dealing_with_Construction_Project_an_Empirical_Study_in_Jordan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anita Liu & Anthony Walker, 1998. "Evaluation of project outcomes," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 209-219.
    2. Alan Wild, 2004. "Re-interpreting the Building Industry Communications Research Project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 303-310.
    3. Ammon Salter & Richard Torbett, 2003. "Innovation and performance in engineering design," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 573-580.
    4. Zedan Hatush & Martin Skitmore, 1997. "Criteria for contractor selection," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 19-38.
    5. Gladys Kim Wan Siu & Adrian Bridge & Martin Skitmore, 2001. "Assessing the service quality of building maintenance providers: mechanical and engineering services," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 719-726.
    6. Firuzan Yasamis & David Arditi & Jamshid Mohammadi, 2002. "Assessing contractor quality performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 211-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andove Wilson Mwangu & Mike Amuhaya Iravo, 2015. "How Monitoring and Evaluation Affects the Outcome of Constituency Development Fund Projects in Kenya: A Case Study of Projects in Gatanga Constituency," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 13-31, March.
    2. Kapote Mangesh & Patil Pratik & Pimplikar Sunil, 2023. "Effective pre-qualification systems – Are they essential for minimising delays on road projects?," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 213-220, January.
    3. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    4. S. B. Zhang & Anita Liu, 2006. "Organisational culture profiles of construction enterprises in China," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 817-828.
    5. Mei-Yung Leung & Anita Liu, 2003. "Analysis of value and project goal specificity in value management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 11-19.
    6. Paul Jackson & Nancy Richter, 2017. "Situational Logic: An Analysis Of Open Innovation Using Corporate Accelerators," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Hassan Hashemi & Seyed Meysam Mousavi & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Alireza Chalekaee & Zenonas Turskis, 2018. "A New Group Decision Model Based on Grey-Intuitionistic Fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for Contractor Assessment Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Beata GAVUROVA & Andrea TKACOVA & David TUCEK, 2017. "Determinants of Public Fund´s Savings Formation via Public Procurement Process," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(28), pages 25-44, June.
    9. Guang-Xin Gao, 2018. "Sustainable Winner Determination for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Nasser Jameel Al-Shamayleh, 2024. "The Ten-Year Guarantee of the Contractor and the Engineer on Ensuring the Durability of the Building in the System of Applying the Saudi Building Code: A Comparative Study," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, March.
    11. Craig, Justin B. & Dibrell, Clay & Garrett, Robert, 2014. "Examining relationships among family influence, family culture, flexible planning systems, innovativeness and firm performance," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 229-238.
    12. Timothy A. Bodisco & Stuart Palmer, 2020. "Presentation and Evaluation of a New Graduate Unit of Study in Engineering Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Nadeera Abdul Razak & Obuks Ejohwomu & Peter Fenn & Kamil Okedara & Babatunde Dosumu & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, 2021. "Identification of Health and Safety Prequalification Criteria for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Min-Ren Yan, 2015. "Project-Based Market Competition and Policy Implications for Sustainable Developments in Building and Construction Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Cheaitou, Ali & Larbi, Rim & Al Housani, Bashayer, 2019. "Decision making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Carlos A. Bana e Costa & João C. Lourenço & Manuel P. Chagas & João C. Bana e Costa, 2008. "Development of Reusable Bid Evaluation Models for the Portuguese Electric Transmission Company," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 22-42, March.
    17. Amirhosein Jafari, 2013. "A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 746-760, July.
    18. J P Pastor-Ferrando & P Aragonés-Beltrán & A Hospitaler-Pérez & M García-Melón, 2010. "An ANP- and AHP-based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 905-916, June.
    19. Yi Zhang, 2020. "Construction of Bid Evaluation Index System in Government Public Project Green Procurement in China Based on D-S Evidence Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Rota, Cosimo & Zanasi, Cesare, 2011. "Sustainable Relations in International Development Cooperation Projects: The Role of Organizational Climate," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:12:p:109-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.