IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i1p25-d1586444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Multiple Large Shareholders Mitigate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Controversies?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolu Feng

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    School of International Programs, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

  • Norman Mohd Saleh

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Kamarul Baraini Keliwon

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Aziatul Waznah Ghazali

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study examines the effect of multiple large shareholders (MLS) on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversies and the factors that moderate this relationship. It is motivated by the need to understand the determinants of ESG controversies and the lack of consensus in the academic literature regarding the corporate governance role of MLS. Using a panel dataset of Chinese-listed firms from 2008 to 2023, we found that firms with MLS have fewer ESG controversies than non-MLS firms, including those in the environmental, social, and governance dimensions. The findings are robust across different model specifications and alternative variable measurements. Further analyses revealed that the effect of MLS on ESG controversies is more pronounced when the ownership distribution between non-controlling MLS and the controlling shareholder is more balanced, when they have the same identity, and when institutional investors are part of non-controlling MLS. Additionally, this effect is stronger in firms with severe agency conflicts and weaker governance mechanisms. Finally, and more importantly, we found that ESG controversies have a significant negative impact on firm value and that MLS monitoring can help mitigate these adverse effects. In summary, our results suggest that MLS play a monitoring role in ESG controversies and contribute to firm value by reducing their negative consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolu Feng & Norman Mohd Saleh & Kamarul Baraini Keliwon & Aziatul Waznah Ghazali, 2025. "Can Multiple Large Shareholders Mitigate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Controversies?," World, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:25-:d:1586444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/1/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/1/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:25-:d:1586444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.