IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9838-d1518698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Ability and ESG Risks: The Moderating Effect of Internal Control Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolu Feng

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    School of International Programs, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

  • Norman Mohd Saleh

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

Abstract

The 2017 COSO framework highlights the increasing need to incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into firms’ internal control and risk management practices. Top managers play a crucial role in risk management and control. However, it remains unclear whether managerial ability affects ESG risk management. This study investigates the relationship between firms’ ESG risk exposure and managerial ability, and examines whether the quality of internal control (ICQ) influences this relationship. Based on panel data from Chinese listed firms between 2008 and 2022, we found that firms led by more capable managers have lower overall ESG risk exposure, including reduced environmental, social, and governance risks. Furthermore, our findings indicate that higher ICQ strengthens the association between managerial ability and ESG risks. Specifically, an analysis of the five internal control components showed that the mechanisms through which ICQ influences this relationship involve enhancing control environments, risk assessment, control activities, and information and communication channels. Further analysis indicated that the moderating effect of ICQ on the relationship between managerial ability and ESG risks is influenced by management power and the effectiveness of external governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolu Feng & Norman Mohd Saleh, 2024. "Managerial Ability and ESG Risks: The Moderating Effect of Internal Control Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9838-:d:1518698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling Lei Lisic & Terry L. Neal & Ivy Xiying Zhang & Yan Zhang, 2016. "CEO Power, Internal Control Quality, and Audit Committee Effectiveness in Substance Versus in Form," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 1199-1237, September.
    2. Brian W. Nocco & René M. Stulz, 2006. "Enterprise Risk Management: Theory and Practice," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 18(4), pages 8-20, September.
    3. Wu, Zihao & Lin, Siliang & Chen, Tianhao & Luo, Chunyang & Xu, Hui, 2023. "Does effective corporate governance mitigate the negative effect of ESG controversies on firm value?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1772-1793.
    4. Yasemin Y. Kor, 2003. "Experience-Based Top Management Team Competence and Sustained Growth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 707-719, December.
    5. Feng, Mei & Li, Chan & McVay, Sarah, 2009. "Internal control and management guidance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2-3), pages 190-209, December.
    6. Nicolas, Maxime L.D. & Desroziers, Adrien & Caccioli, Fabio & Aste, Tomaso, 2024. "ESG reputation risk matters: An event study based on social media data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Gerrit Sarens & Joe Christopher, 2010. "The association between corporate governance guidelines and risk management and internal control practices," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(4), pages 288-308, April.
    8. Tim R. Holcomb & R. Michael Holmes Jr. & Brian L. Connelly, 2009. "Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 457-485, May.
    9. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    10. Stefan Schaltegger & Jacob Hörisch, 2017. "In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 259-276, October.
    11. Maury, Benjamin, 2022. "Strategic CSR and firm performance: The role of prospector and growth strategies," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Cheng, Mei & Dhaliwal, Dan & Zhang, Yuan, 2013. "Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chalmers, Keryn & Hay, David & Khlif, Hichem, 2019. "Internal control in accounting research: A review," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 80-103.
    2. Baolei Qi & Liuchuang Li & Qing Zhou & Jinghui Sun, 2017. "Does internal control over financial reporting really alleviate agency conflicts?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(4), pages 1101-1125, December.
    3. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2021. "Internal control effectiveness, textual risk disclosure, and their usefulness: U.S. evidence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Inder K. Khurana & Hoyoun Kyung, 2021. "Internal control material weakness and CEO recruitment," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(9-10), pages 1940-1987, October.
    6. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Kreuzer, Christian & Sparrer, Christian, 2022. "To sin in secret is no sin at all: On the linkage of policy, society, culture, and firm characteristics with corporate scandals," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 762-784.
    7. Teklay, Belaynesh & Yu, Wei & Zhu, Keying, 2024. "The effect of superstitious beliefs on corporate investment efficiency: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1434-1447.
    8. Dongyoung Lee, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Management Forecast Accuracy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 353-367, January.
    9. Sungchang Kang & Jeongseok Bang & Doojin Ryu, 2024. "Female CEOs’ risk management and earnings performance during the financial crisis," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 110-138, February.
    10. Oliver Henk, 2020. "Internal control through the lens of institutional work: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 239-273, September.
    11. Joel Harper & Kristopher J. Kemper & Li Sun, 2019. "Managerial ability and bond rating changes," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 381-401, December.
    12. Ranjan D’Mello & Xinghua Gao & Yonghong Jia, 2017. "Internal control and internal capital allocation: evidence from internal capital markets of multi-segment firms," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 251-287, March.
    13. Todd D. Kravet & Sarah E. McVay & David P. Weber, 2018. "Costs and benefits of internal control audits: evidence from M&A transactions," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1389-1423, December.
    14. SiJian Niu & Byung Il Park & Jin Sup Jung, 2022. "The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Li, Zhe & Wang, Bo & Wu, Tianlong & Zhou, Dan, 2021. "The influence of qualified foreign institutional investors on internal control quality: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Choi, Dongjoon & Lee, Hansol & Lee, Ho-Young & Park, Hyun-Young, 2021. "The association between human resource investment in IT controls over financial reporting and investment efficiency," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    17. Christopher D. Ittner & Jeremy Michels, 2017. "Risk-based forecasting and planning and management earnings forecasts," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1005-1047, September.
    18. Dong, Feng & Doukas, John, 2021. "The effect of managers on M&As," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Ge, Weili & Koester, Allison & McVay, Sarah, 2017. "Benefits and costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) exemption: Evidence from small firms’ internal control disclosures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 358-384.
    20. Call, Andrew C. & Campbell, John L. & Dhaliwal, Dan S. & Moon, James R., 2017. "Employee quality and financial reporting outcomes," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 123-149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9838-:d:1518698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.