IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p1064-d102079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation?

Author

Listed:
  • Shufang Wang

    (Research Center for Energy Economics, School of Business and Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China)

  • Axing Zhu

    (Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, 53706 WI, USA)

  • Yuejing Ge

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yuli Liu

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xiao Xue

    (School of Computer Science, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China)

Abstract

In the last 30 years, China’s economic power has experienced great changes and has brought about a profound impact on the world economy. This led us to ask a question: do changes in China’s economic power shift the geo-economic relationships between China and its neighboring countries? To answer this question, we researched the evolution of geo-economic relationships between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. Using the Euclidean distance method, we explored the changes in these geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries from 1980 to 2014. Our findings resulted in five conclusions: (1) Over time, geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries remained relatively stable. (2) Geographically, the main geo-economic relationships between China and continental ASEAN countries were complementary, while the main geo-economic relationships between China and island ASEAN countries were competitive. (3) Geopolitics and geo-culture were attributed to the changes in geo-economic relationships. (4) The evolution of geo-economic relationships was characterized by path dependence. (5) Geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries could be classified into four types: game type, with high cooperation and competition; complementary type, with high cooperation and low competition; fight type, with low cooperation and high competition; and loose type, with low cooperation and competition. Our findings contribute to improving the understanding of geo-economic relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Shufang Wang & Axing Zhu & Yuejing Ge & Yuli Liu & Xiao Xue, 2017. "The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1064-:d:102079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanson, Gordon H., 2001. "U.S.-Mexico Integration and Regional Economies: Evidence from Border-City Pairs," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 259-287, September.
    2. Jonathan Holslag, 2016. "Geoeconomics in a globalized world: the case of China’s export policy," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 173-184, June.
    3. Mikael Wigell, 2016. "Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 135-151, June.
    4. Mikko Huotari & Sandra Heep, 2016. "Learning geoeconomics: China’s experimental financial and monetary initiatives," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 153-171, June.
    5. Fithra Faisal Hastiadi, 2011. "East Asian Regionalism: The Need For Asean+3 Fta," Journal of Global Business and Economics, Global Research Agency, vol. 3(1), pages 31-56, July.
    6. Mikael Mattlin & Mikael Wigell, 2016. "Geoeconomics in the context of restive regional powers," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 125-134, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Cuixia & Tao, Simin & Su, Bin & Mensah, Isaac Adjei & Sun, Mei, 2023. "Exploring renewable energy trade coopetition relationships: Evidence from belt and road countries, 1996-2018," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 196-209.
    2. Zhao, Yujia & Shuai, Jing & Shi, Yin & Lu, Yang & Zhang, Zumeng, 2022. "Exploring the co-opetition mechanism of renewable energy trade between China and the “Belt and Road” countries: A dynamic game approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 998-1008.
    3. Zhao, Yabo & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wang, Shaojian & Ge, Yuejing, 2019. "Energy relations between China and the countries along the Belt and Road: An analysis of the distribution of energy resources and interdependence relationships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 133-144.
    4. Ishchenko-Padukova Oksana (Ищенко-Падукова О.) & Movchan Irina (Мовчан И. В.), 2019. "Methodological Bases Of Building The Geoeconomic Strategy Of Regional Development [Методологические Основы Построения Геоэкономической Стратегии Регионального Развития]," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 97-101.
    5. Shufang Wang & Xiao Xue & Axing Zhu & Yuejing Ge, 2017. "The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Tao Song & Weidong Liu & Zhigao Liu & Yeerken Wuzhati, 2019. "Policy Mobilities and the China Model: Pairing Aid Policy in Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Yi Liang & Mingxing Chen & Dadao Lu & Zijin Ding & Zhi Zheng, 2019. "The Spatial Evolution of Geoeconomic Pattern among China and Neighboring Countries since the Reform and Opening-Up," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Qin Dang & Yu Huang & Yuan Hu & Shuai Ye & Shufang Wang, 2020. "Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Weiqing Song, 2019. "Logic of the Chinese developmental state and China’s geo-economic engagement with Central and Eastern Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 387-401, December.
    3. Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Zhiding Hu & Shuai Ye & Feng Yang & Haining Jiang & Kun Hou & Yun Deng, 2022. "Geo-Economic Linkages between China and the Countries along the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road and Their Types," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Shufang Wang & Xiao Xue & Axing Zhu & Yuejing Ge, 2017. "The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Alberto Díaz Dapena & Esteban Fernández Vázquez & Rafael Garduño Rivera & Fernando Rubiera Morollón, 2015. "Does Trade Imply Convergence? Analyzing The Effect of NAFTA on The Local Convergence in Mexico," Working Papers DTE 591, CIDE, División de Economía.
    6. Peter Mayerhofer, 2006. "A Change in Location Advantages in Austria since the Opening of Eastern Europe. On Developments of the Austrian Location Pattern since 1990," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 11(3), pages 125-137, September.
    7. Nuria Gallego & Carlos Llano, 2014. "The Border Effect and the Nonlinear Relationship between Trade and Distance," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 1016-1048, November.
    8. Crozet, Matthieu & Koenig Soubeyran, Pamina, 2004. "EU enlargement and the internal geography of countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 265-279, June.
    9. Andrew J. Cassey, 2010. "Analyzing the export flow from Texas to Mexico," Staff Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Oct.
    10. Christoph Albert & Joan Monras, 2022. "Immigration and Spatial Equilibrium: The Role of Expenditures in the Country of Origin," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(11), pages 3763-3802, November.
    11. José Aguilar Retureta, 2016. "Explaining regional inequality from the periphery: The mexican case, 1900-2000," Documentos de Trabajo (DT-AEHE) 1608, Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
    12. Harrison, Ann & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2010. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4039-4214, Elsevier.
    13. Indaco, Agustín, 2020. "From twitter to GDP: Estimating economic activity from social media," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Hongbin Li & Lei Li & Binzhen Wu & Yanyan Xiong, 2012. "The End of Cheap Chinese Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(4), pages 57-74, Fall.
    15. Ketevani Kapanadze, 2021. "Checkmate! Losing with Borders, Winning with Centers. The Case of European Integration," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp716, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    16. Kahn, Matthew E., 2004. "Domestic pollution havens: evidence from cancer deaths in border counties," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 51-69, July.
    17. Eduardo Saucedo & Teofilo Ozuna & Hector Zamora, 2020. "The effect of FDI on low and high-skilled employment and wages in Mexico: a study for the manufacture and service sectors," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 54(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Nicole Madariaga & Sylvie Montout & Patrice Ollivaud, 2004. "Regional convergence, trade liberalization and agglomeration of activities: an analysis of NAFTA and MERCOSUR cases," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques bla04069, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    19. Mondal, Supriyo, 2023. "International Trade and Global Value Chain: An Overview," MPRA Paper 116018, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Sofia GOUVEIA & Leonida CORREIA & Patrícia MARTINS, 2020. "European integration and its effects on population in border and peripheral regions," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 8-27, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1064-:d:102079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.