IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p2168-d221907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatial Evolution of Geoeconomic Pattern among China and Neighboring Countries since the Reform and Opening-Up

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Liang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Mingxing Chen

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dadao Lu

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Zijin Ding

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Zhi Zheng

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

The rise of China has had a profound impact on the world and regional political and economic pattern since the reform and opening-up. This paper studies the impact of China’s development on the evolution of the surrounding geo-pattern from the perspective of geoeconomics. Based on the sensitivity and vulnerability of asymmetric interdependence, trade and investment indicators are selected to construct a quantitative model to measure the relative economic dependence between China and neighboring countries. This paper analyzes the degree, types and trends of relative economic dependence and the relationship between economic interdependence and political relations, and investigates the surrounding geoeconomic cooperation. The results are shown as follows: (1) Since 2010, all neighboring countries have had relative economic dependence on China. China’s geoeconomic position in the surrounding area has radically transformed. (2) Since the reform and opening-up, the relative economic dependence of neighboring countries on China has been rising, from negative to positive and from low to high. After 2003, the types of relative economic dependence have gradually shifted from dual low and trade-compensative dependence to dual high and trade-oriented dependence. (3) Trade was the dominant factor in the relative economic dependence of most neighboring countries on China, and it was also the main factor contributing to China’s economic advantages over great powers in the neighborhood. The majority of neighboring countries’ investment dependence on China increased faster than their trade dependence, and the growth of their relative economic dependence will gradually turn to investment in the future. (4) The improvement of political relations between China and neighboring countries provides a foundation for the development of economic relations, and economic relations have the “inertia” of resisting political risks. The deepening of economic ties is conducive to friendly and stable political relations. (5) China’s peripheral geoeconomic strategy focuses on cooperation rather than competition. One of the goals of geoeconomics is the pursuit of joint economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Liang & Mingxing Chen & Dadao Lu & Zijin Ding & Zhi Zheng, 2019. "The Spatial Evolution of Geoeconomic Pattern among China and Neighboring Countries since the Reform and Opening-Up," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2168-:d:221907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Wigell, 2016. "Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 135-151, June.
    2. Shufang Wang & Axing Zhu & Yuejing Ge & Yuli Liu & Xiao Xue, 2017. "The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Seung-Ook Lee & Joel Wainwright & Jim Glassman, 2018. "Geopolitical economy and the production of territory: The case of US–China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 416-436, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinhui Li & Gwang-Nam Rim & Chol-Ju An, 2023. "Comparative Study of Knowledge-Based Economic Strength Between China and the USA," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4256-4292, December.
    2. Luiza Kostecka-Tomaszewska & Monika Krukowska, 2020. "Europe between China and the United States: Geoeconomic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 286-291.
    3. Jiaqi Wu & Wenbo Li & Wenting Xu & Lin Yuan, 2023. "Measuring Resident Participation in the Renewal of Older Residential Communities in China under Policy Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Ying Wang & Xiangyu Mao & Hashim Zameer, 2022. "Designing benefit distribution driven innovation strategy for local enterprises under the global value chain system," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2358-2373, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shufang Wang & Xiao Xue & Axing Zhu & Yuejing Ge, 2017. "The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Tao Song & Weidong Liu & Zhigao Liu & Yeerken Wuzhati, 2019. "Policy Mobilities and the China Model: Pairing Aid Policy in Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Weiqing Song, 2019. "Logic of the Chinese developmental state and China’s geo-economic engagement with Central and Eastern Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 387-401, December.
    4. Ishchenko-Padukova Oksana (Ищенко-Падукова О.) & Movchan Irina (Мовчан И. В.), 2019. "Methodological Bases Of Building The Geoeconomic Strategy Of Regional Development [Методологические Основы Построения Геоэкономической Стратегии Регионального Развития]," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 97-101.
    5. Gao, Cuixia & Tao, Simin & Su, Bin & Mensah, Isaac Adjei & Sun, Mei, 2023. "Exploring renewable energy trade coopetition relationships: Evidence from belt and road countries, 1996-2018," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 196-209.
    6. Shufang Wang & Axing Zhu & Yuejing Ge & Yuli Liu & Xiao Xue, 2017. "The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Nicole VASILKOVSCHI, 2022. "The increasing importance of teaching and learning geoeconomics in a meaningful context," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 14(3), pages 269-284, December.
    8. Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Zhiding Hu & Shuai Ye & Feng Yang & Haining Jiang & Kun Hou & Yun Deng, 2022. "Geo-Economic Linkages between China and the Countries along the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road and Their Types," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    9. Zhao, Yabo & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wang, Shaojian & Ge, Yuejing, 2019. "Energy relations between China and the countries along the Belt and Road: An analysis of the distribution of energy resources and interdependence relationships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 133-144.
    10. Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Qin Dang & Yu Huang & Yuan Hu & Shuai Ye & Shufang Wang, 2020. "Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Zhao, Yujia & Shuai, Jing & Shi, Yin & Lu, Yang & Zhang, Zumeng, 2022. "Exploring the co-opetition mechanism of renewable energy trade between China and the “Belt and Road” countries: A dynamic game approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 998-1008.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2168-:d:221907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.