IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i3p438-d93272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards the Introduction of Sustainable Fishery Products: The Bid of a Major Italian Retailer

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Bonanomi

    (Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Largo Fiera della Pesca 1, 60125 Ancona, Italy)

  • Alessandro Colombelli

    (Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Largo Fiera della Pesca 1, 60125 Ancona, Italy)

  • Loretta Malvarosa

    (NISEA-Fisheries and Aquaculture Economic Reserarch, Via Irno 11, 84135 Salerno, Italy)

  • Maria Cozzolino

    (NISEA-Fisheries and Aquaculture Economic Reserarch, Via Irno 11, 84135 Salerno, Italy)

  • Antonello Sala

    (Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Largo Fiera della Pesca 1, 60125 Ancona, Italy)

Abstract

Intense fishing pressure has been depleting marine resources worldwide. At a time when almost a third of world stocks are overexploited, the demand for fish and seafood is growing both due to the increasing world population and to rising per capita consumption. Over the past few decades, the demand for fish products has in turn grown considerably in Italy, although concern about sustainable fisheries here is not perceived as keenly as in Northern European countries, where certified fish and seafood products coming from sustainable fisheries are widely available. In this study, 248 fish and seafood products sold by a major Italian retailer were evaluated in terms of geographic origin, gear used, species conservation status, and stock status to gain information in view of the introduction of sustainable fishery products in Italy’s outlets. A literature review illustrated that most species came from some of the most intensely exploited fishing grounds in the world, where they are usually caught by trawls. The results highlighted the importance of supplying seafood products coming from sustainable sources and fisheries through the adoption of eco-labels and certification schemes. Finally, the present study stresses the urgency to promote more responsible fish and seafood consumption in Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Bonanomi & Alessandro Colombelli & Loretta Malvarosa & Maria Cozzolino & Antonello Sala, 2017. "Towards the Introduction of Sustainable Fishery Products: The Bid of a Major Italian Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:438-:d:93272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/438/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/438/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gulbrandsen, Lars H., 2009. "The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 654-660, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María-José Gutiérrez & Belén Inguanzo, 2019. "Contributing to Fisheries Sustainability: Inequality Analysis in the High Seas Catches of Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Qi Chen & Weiteng Shen & Bing Yu, 2018. "Assessing the Vulnerability of Marine Fisheries in China: Towards an Inter-Provincial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Sara Bonanomi & Alessandro Colombelli & Bruno Bucciarelli & Riccardo De Angelis & Antonello Sala, 2019. "Serving Local Fish in School Meals: The Nutritional Importance of Consuming Oily Fish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Natali, F. & Cacchiarelli, L. & Branca, G., 2022. "There are plenty more (sustainable) fish in the sea: A discrete choice experiment on discarded species in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Xianwen & Alfnes, Frode & Rickertsen, Kyrre, 2014. "Consumer Preferences, Ecolabels, and the Effects of Negative Environmental Information," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 168094, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Pete Tashman & Jorge Rivera, 2016. "Ecological uncertainty, adaptation, and mitigation in the U.S. ski resort industry: Managing resource dependence and institutional pressures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1507-1525, July.
    3. Schleifer, Philip & Fiorini, Matteo & Fransen, Luc, 2019. "Missing the Bigger Picture: A Population-level Analysis of Transnational Private Governance Organizations Active in the Global South," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Jeroen Vos & Rutgerd Boelens, 2014. "Sustainability Standards and the Water Question," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(2), pages 205-230, March.
    5. Simon Nicol & Valerie Allain & Graham Pilling & Jeff Polovina & Marta Coll & Johann Bell & Paul Dalzell & Peter Sharples & Robert Olson & Shane Griffiths & Jeffrey Dambacher & Jock Young & Antony Lewi, 2013. "An ocean observation system for monitoring the affects of climate change on the ecology and sustainability of pelagic fisheries in the Pacific Ocean," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 131-145, July.
    6. Olson, Julia & Clay, Patricia M. & Pinto da Silva, Patricia, 2014. "Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 104-111.
    7. Carlson, Anna & Palmer, Charles, 2016. "A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labeling in developing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 129-145.
    8. Tomohiko Ohno, 2019. "Understanding diverse trajectories of environmental governance studies: a citation network analysis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 214-228, June.
    9. Kate Barclay & Alice Miller, 2018. "The Sustainable Seafood Movement Is a Governance Concert, with the Audience Playing a Key Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Marieke Douma & Jeroen van Wijk, 2012. "ASC Certified Shrimp: Can Extensive Shrimp Farming Benefit? A case study of Indonesia," Working Papers 2012/46, Maastricht School of Management.
    11. Thomas Dietz & Janina Grabs & Andrea Estrella Chong, 2021. "Mainstreamed voluntary sustainability standards and their effectiveness: Evidence from the Honduran coffee sector," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 333-355, April.
    12. Chen, Xianwen & Alfnes , Frode & Rickertsen , Kyrre, 2015. "Labeling Farmed Seafood," Working Paper Series 10-2015, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    13. Rob Barlow, 2022. "Deliberation Without Democracy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Pragmatic Way Forward," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 543-561, December.
    14. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    15. Simon R. Bush & Peter Oosterveer, 2015. "Vertically Differentiating Environmental Standards: The Case of the Marine Stewardship Council," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Zezza, Annalisa, 2012. "CERTIFICATION ON SUSTAINABILITY IN THE BIOFUEL SECTOR: a case study on Brazilian ethanol," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124112, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    17. Yeeting, Agnes D. & Bush, Simon R. & Ram-Bidesi, Vina & Bailey, Megan, 2016. "Implications of new economic policy instruments for tuna management in the Western and Central Pacific," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 45-52.
    18. Blackman, Allen & Rivera, Jorge, 2010. "The Evidence Base for Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of “Sustainable” Certification," RFF Working Paper Series dp-10-17, Resources for the Future.
    19. Ives, M.C. & Scandol, J.P. & Greenville, J., 2013. "A bio-economic management strategy evaluation for a multi-species, multi-fleet fishery facing a world of uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 69-84.
    20. Hoang, Phi & McGuire, William & Prakash, Aseem, 2016. "Is there Life after Death?: The Enduring Effects of the 33/50 Program on Emission Reductions," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235556, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:438-:d:93272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.