IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v256y2013icp69-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bio-economic management strategy evaluation for a multi-species, multi-fleet fishery facing a world of uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Ives, M.C.
  • Scandol, J.P.
  • Greenville, J.

Abstract

A bio-economic analysis was conducted for two fisheries using a multi-species size-based meta-population model built using the BIOMAS modelling system. The model was built to represent the prawn fisheries of northern New South Wales, Australia and calibrated against 26 years of catch and effort data from this region. A number of alternative management strategies, including the use of more size selective gear and a cap on total effort, were evaluated for their impact on the sustainability of the fish stocks and the profitability of the fleets as well as their robustness to future biological, climatic and economic uncertainties. Although the differences in management strategies were blurred by the uncertainty incorporated into the model there were still some very interesting high-level insights to be gained from the analysis. The modelled prawn species appear to be much more robust to changes in management strategies and product prices than the fleet profits, suggesting the stocks are less vulnerability to such uncertainties than the fleets that harvest them. We also found larger differences in profitability from changes in product prices than from changes in management strategies, indicating that strategies to protect product prices may be of more importance to the profitability of the fisheries than changes to fishing gear or effort levels. Such results highlight the complexity of multi-species, multi-fleet fisheries and the importance of including all relevant species and fisheries in any management strategy evaluations. This complexity can however sometimes mask simple economic truths, such as the need for strategies to maintain the market price of locally caught seafood products under the increasing pressures of international competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ives, M.C. & Scandol, J.P. & Greenville, J., 2013. "A bio-economic management strategy evaluation for a multi-species, multi-fleet fishery facing a world of uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 69-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:256:y:2013:i:c:p:69-84
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.01.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013000513
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.01.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayri Önal & Bruce A. McCarl & Wade L. Griffin & Gary Matlock & Jerry Clark, 1991. "A Bioeconomic Analysis of the Texas Shrimp Fishery and Its Optimal Management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1161-1170.
    2. Greenville, Jared W. & MacAulay, T. Gordon, 2006. "Protected areas in fisheries: a two-patch, two-species model," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 1-20, June.
    3. O’Callaghan, Michael & Gordon, G.N.G., 2008. "An individual-based stochastic hazard model of eastern king prawn (Melicertus plebejus) migration with spatially and temporally varying fishing effort," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 73-94.
    4. Ives, Matthew C. & Scandol, James P., 2013. "BIOMAS: A bio-economic modelling and assessment system for fisheries management strategy evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 42-49.
    5. Daniel E. Lane, 1989. "A Partially Observable Model of Decision Making by Fishermen," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 240-254, April.
    6. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    7. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and related analysis : A survey of statistical techniques," Research Memorandum FEW 706, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Bess, Randall, 2012. "Public management in New Zealand and its effect on institutional arrangements for managing fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 550-558.
    9. Jared Greenville & T. Gordon MacAulay, 2006. "Protected areas in fisheries: a two-patch, two-species model ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 207-226, June.
    10. Schumann, Sarah & Macinko, Seth, 2007. "Subsistence in coastal fisheries policy: What's in a word?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 706-718, November.
    11. Gulbrandsen, Lars H., 2009. "The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 654-660, July.
    12. Hannesson, Rognvaldur, 2007. "Growth accounting in a fishery," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 364-376, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Pei & Woodward, Richard T. & Wilberg, Michael & Tomberlin, David, 2013. "Management Evaluation for the Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab Fishery: An Integrated Bioeconomic Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150974, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kvamsdal, Sturla F. & Maroto, José M. & Morán, Manuel & Sandal, Leif K., 2020. "Bioeconomic modeling of seasonal fisheries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 332-340.
    2. Auger, Pierre & Kooi, Bob & Moussaoui, Ali, 2022. "Increase of maximum sustainable yield for fishery in two patches with fast migration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    3. Bjorndal, Trond & Lane, Daniel E. & Weintraub, Andres, 2004. "Operational research models and the management of fisheries and aquaculture: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 533-540, August.
    4. Torres, Marcelo de O. & Felthoven, Ronald G., 2014. "Productivity growth and product choice in catch share fisheries: The case of Alaska pollock," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 280-289.
    5. Pete Tashman & Jorge Rivera, 2016. "Ecological uncertainty, adaptation, and mitigation in the U.S. ski resort industry: Managing resource dependence and institutional pressures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1507-1525, July.
    6. Santos, Mário & Bastos, Rita & Cabral, João Alexandre, 2013. "Converting conventional ecological datasets in dynamic and dynamic spatially explicit simulations: Current advances and future applications of the Stochastic Dynamic Methodology (StDM)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 91-100.
    7. Olson, Julia & Clay, Patricia M. & Pinto da Silva, Patricia, 2014. "Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 104-111.
    8. Carlson, Anna & Palmer, Charles, 2016. "A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labeling in developing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 129-145.
    9. Hao Zhang, 2010. "Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes: A Geometric Technique and Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 214-228, February.
    10. Chernonog, Tatyana & Avinadav, Tal, 2016. "A two-state partially observable Markov decision process with three actionsAuthor-Name: Ben-Zvi, Tal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 957-967.
    11. Poe, Melissa R. & Levin, Phillip S. & Tolimieri, Nick & Norman, Karma, 2015. "Subsistence fishing in a 21st century capitalist society: From commodity to gift," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 241-250.
    12. Tomohiko Ohno, 2019. "Understanding diverse trajectories of environmental governance studies: a citation network analysis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 214-228, June.
    13. Kate Barclay & Alice Miller, 2018. "The Sustainable Seafood Movement Is a Governance Concert, with the Audience Playing a Key Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Robert Chambers & Giannis Karagiannis & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2014. "Productivity accounting for separable technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 41-50, February.
    15. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    16. Marieke Douma & Jeroen van Wijk, 2012. "ASC Certified Shrimp: Can Extensive Shrimp Farming Benefit? A case study of Indonesia," Working Papers 2012/46, Maastricht School of Management.
    17. Thomas Dietz & Janina Grabs & Andrea Estrella Chong, 2021. "Mainstreamed voluntary sustainability standards and their effectiveness: Evidence from the Honduran coffee sector," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 333-355, April.
    18. Smajgl, Alex & House, Alan P.N. & Butler, James R.A., 2011. "Implications of ecological data constraints for integrated policy and livelihoods modelling: An example from East Kalimantan, Indonesia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 888-896.
    19. Chen, Xianwen & Alfnes , Frode & Rickertsen , Kyrre, 2015. "Labeling Farmed Seafood," Working Paper Series 10-2015, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    20. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:256:y:2013:i:c:p:69-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.