IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i1p54-d61896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Flat Roof Technologies for Office Buildings in Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Pushkar

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel)

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to evaluate the environmental damage from three flat roof technologies typically used in Israel: (i) concrete, (ii) ribbed slab with concrete blocks, and (iii) ribbed slab with autoclaved aerated blocks. The roofs were evaluated using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. The Production and Construction (P and C), Operational Energy (OE), and Maintenance to Demolition (MtoD) stages were considered. The roofs were modeled based on an office building module located in the four climate zones of Israel, and the hierarchical ReCiPe2008 Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) method was applied. The percent difference of one, which is the default methodological option of ReCiPe2008, and an ANOVA of the six methodological options of ReCiPe2008 were used. The results revealed that (i) in a hot climate, the best roof technology can be selected by considering only the OE stage, whereas in a mild climate, both the OE and P and C stages must be considered; (ii) in a hot climate, the best roof technology is a concrete roof, but in a mild climate, the best options are ribbed slab roofs with concrete blocks and autoclaved aerated blocks; and (iii) the conjugation of ReCiPe2008 with a two-stage nested ANOVA is the appropriate approach to evaluate the differences in environmental damage in order to compare flat roof technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Pushkar, 2016. "Life Cycle Assessment of Flat Roof Technologies for Office Buildings in Israel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:54-:d:61896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/54/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/54/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedman, Chanoch & Becker, Nir & Erell, Evyatar, 2014. "Energy retrofit of residential building envelopes in Israel: A cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 183-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Umberto Vitiello & Antonio Salzano & Domenico Asprone & Marco Di Ludovico & Andrea Prota, 2016. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Seismic Retrofit Strategies Applied to Existing Building Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. João Gomes Ferreira & Mário de Matos & Hugo Silva & Afonso Franca & Pedro Duarte, 2021. "Sustainable Campus: The Experience of the University of Lisbon at IST," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Montse Meneses & Henry Concepción & Ramon Vilanova, 2016. "Joint Environmental and Economical Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Plants Control Strategies: A Benchmark Scenario Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belaïd, Fateh & Ranjbar, Zeinab & Massié, Camille, 2021. "Exploring the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency implementation measures in the residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Tettey, Uniben Y.A., 2017. "Final energy savings and cost-effectiveness of deep energy renovation of a multi-storey residential building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 563-576.
    3. Jie, Pengfei & Yan, Fuchun & Li, Jing & Zhang, Yumei & Wen, Zhimei, 2019. "Optimizing the insulation thickness of walls of existing buildings with CHP-based district heating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Gabriele Battista & Emanuele de Lieto Vollaro & Andrea Vallati & Roberto de Lieto Vollaro, 2023. "Technical–Financial Feasibility Study of a Micro-Cogeneration System in the Buildings in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Jim, C.Y., 2015. "Cold-season solar input and ambivalent thermal behavior brought by climber greenwalls," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 926-938.
    6. Serrano, Susana & de Gracia, Alvaro & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2016. "Adaptation of rammed earth to modern construction systems: Comparative study of thermal behavior under summer conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 180-188.
    7. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Sánchez-García, Daniel & Rubio-Bellido, Carlos, 2020. "Comparison of energy conservation measures considering adaptive thermal comfort and climate change in existing Mediterranean dwellings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Svetlana Pushkar & Abraham Yezioro, 2022. "External Shading Devices: Should the Energy Standard Be Supplemented with a Production Stage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Luca Evangelisti & Claudia Guattari & Paola Gori & Roberto De Lieto Vollaro, 2015. "In Situ Thermal Transmittance Measurements for Investigating Differences between Wall Models and Actual Building Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-11, August.
    10. Matthew Collins & John Curtis, 2017. "Value for money in energy efficiency retrofits in Ireland: grant provider and grant recipients," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(51), pages 5245-5267, November.
    11. Barbetta, Gian Paolo & Canino, Paolo & Cima, Stefano, 2015. "The impact of energy audits on energy efficiency investment of public owners. Evidence from Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1199-1209.
    12. David Bienvenido-Huertas, 2020. "Analysis of the Relationship of the Improvement of Façades and Thermal Bridges of Spanish Building Stock with the Mitigation of Its Energy and Environmental Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Lešnik, Maja & Premrov, Miroslav & Žegarac Leskovar, Vesna, 2018. "Design parameters of the timber-glass upgrade module and the existing building: Impact on the energy-efficient refurbishment process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1125-1138.
    14. David Bienvenido-Huertas & Miguel Oliveira & Carlos Rubio-Bellido & David Marín, 2019. "A Comparative Analysis of the International Regulation of Thermal Properties in Building Envelope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-30, October.
    15. Jie, Pengfei & Zhang, Fenghe & Fang, Zhou & Wang, Hongbo & Zhao, Yunfeng, 2018. "Optimizing the insulation thickness of walls and roofs of existing buildings based on primary energy consumption, global cost and pollutant emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1132-1147.
    16. Luca Evangelisti & Claudia Guattari & Paola Gori, 2015. "Energy Retrofit Strategies for Residential Building Envelopes: An Italian Case Study of an Early-50s Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Kamel, Ehsan & Memari, Ali M., 2018. "Automated Building Energy Modeling and Assessment Tool (ABEMAT)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 15-24.
    18. Goulden, Shula & Erell, Evyatar & Pearlmutter, David & Garb, Yaakov, 2020. "Embracing uncertainty in building energy efficiency policy: A case study of a building energy standard," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Yung Yau & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Ka Chi Yip & Queena Kun Qian, 2021. "Transaction Cost and Agency Perspectives on Eco-Certification of Existing Buildings: A Study of Hong Kong," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Ma, Dingyuan & Li, Xiaodong & Lin, Borong & Zhu, Yimin, 2023. "An intelligent retrofit decision-making model for building program planning considering tacit knowledge and multiple objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:54-:d:61896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.