IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i9p5745-5762d39742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Audience-Centric Approach for Museums Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Di Pietro

    (Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, via Silvio D'Amico, 77 Rome, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion

    (Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, via Silvio D'Amico, 77 Rome, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Maria Francesca Renzi

    (Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, via Silvio D'Amico, 77 Rome, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Martina Toni

    (Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, via Silvio D'Amico, 77 Rome, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to propose a visitor centric perspective that can support museums towards sustainability. The main premise of this study is due to a concept of economic and social sustainability of museums, defined as the possession of sufficient resources to maintain the existence of an organization, and achieve their goals in the future, ensuring a certain flow of visitors. A great number of museums are characterized by a low number of visits; therefore, in order to become sustainable, museums should pay attention to audience and its internal diversity. In this way, a cultural site can plan tailored strategies to increase the number of visits and re-visits and to achieve community support. For this reason it is necessary to understand the cultural needs of visitors, acquiring appropriate monitoring tools, such as qualitative and quantitative ones. Generally, quantitative analyses are more reliable and complete, even if they require a considerable number of observations for the reliability of the results. Moreover, qualitative analysis provides more in depth information, even if their data do not allow us to make generalizations. The qualitative and quantitative methods for the detection of satisfaction are usually used separately, but their integration may bring significant added value in terms of the wealth of information. This study follows the analysis of the potential of the integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques customized with respect to different types of targets. The results of the experimentation performed on ethnographic museums shows a consistency of the results obtained by the two different tools that increase the capacity information of survey instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Di Pietro & Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Maria Francesca Renzi & Martina Toni, 2014. "An Audience-Centric Approach for Museums Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:9:p:5745-5762:d:39742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/5745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/5745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Babakus, Emin & Boller, Gregory W., 1992. "An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 253-268, May.
    3. Lau Pei Mey & Badaruddin Mohamed, 2010. "Service Quality, Visitor Satisfaction And Behavioural Intentions: Pilot Study At A Museum In Malaysia," Journal of Global Business and Economics, Global Research Agency, vol. 1(1), pages 226-240, July.
    4. Weerawardena, Jay & Mort, Gillian Sullivan, 2006. "Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 21-35, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alicia Orea-Giner & Jorge Calero-Sanz & Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero & Trinidad Vacas-Guerrero, 2021. "An Exploratory Analysis of Museum Attributes from the Perspective of Tourists and Residents: The Case of Thyssen-Bornemisza National Museum, Madrid, Spain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Siyi Wang & Liying Yu & Yuan Rong, 2024. "Measuring museum sustainability in China: a DSR model-driven approach to empower sustainable development goals (SDGs)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Pedro Luengo, 2020. "Sustainable Illumination for Baroque Paintings with Historical Context Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Tonino Pencarelli & Mara Cerquetti & Simone Splendiani, 2016. "The sustainable management of museums: an Italian perspective," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 22(1), pages 29-46, May.
    5. Che-Chuan Hsu & Rua-Huan Tsaih & David C. Yen, 2018. "The Evolving Role of IT Departments in Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Xianyuan Chang & Zhaoping Wu & Yi Chen & Yuanyuan Du & Longfei Shang & Ying Ge & Jie Chang & Guofu Yang, 2021. "The Booming Number of Museums and Their Inequality Changes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Yun-Ciao Wang & Shang-Chia Chiou, 2018. "An Analysis of the Sustainable Development of Environmental Education Provided by Museums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Izabela Luiza Pop & Anca Borza, 2016. "Factors Influencing Museum Sustainability and Indicators for Museum Sustainability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Kalliopi Kontiza & Angeliki Antoniou & Abdullah Daif & Susana Reboreda-Morillo & Maddalena Bassani & Silvia González-Soutelo & Ioanna Lykourentzou & Catherine Emma Jones & Joseph Padfield & Martín Lóp, 2020. "On How Technology-Powered Storytelling Can Contribute to Cultural Heritage Sustainability across Multiple Venues—Evidence from the CrossCult H2020 Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Luisa Errichiello & Roberto Micera, 2018. "Leveraging Smart Open Innovation for Achieving Cultural Sustainability: Learning from a New City Museum Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Mara Cerquetti & Domenico Sardanelli & Concetta Ferrara, 2024. "Measuring museum sustainability within the framework of institutional theory: A dictionary‐based content analysis of French and British National Museums' annual reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2260-2276, May.
    12. Mara Cerquetti & Concetta Ferrara, 2018. "Marketing Research for Cultural Heritage Conservation and Sustainability: Lessons from the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shubhabrata Basu & Anita Sharma, 2014. "Exploring Stewardship as an Antecedent Behavioural Trait of Social Entrepreneurs," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(1), pages 19-33, March.
    2. Yeamduan Narangajavana & Tomas Gonzalez-Cruz & Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & Sonia Cruz-Ros, 2016. "Measuring social entrepreneurship and social value with leakage. Definition, analysis and policies for the hospitality industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 911-934, September.
    3. Inna Khovrak, 2018. "Social Entrepreneurship and Its Role in Sustainable Development: Regulation, Funding and Trust Building (Przedsiebiorczosc spoleczna i jej rola w zrownowazonym rozwoju – regulacja, finansowanie i budo," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(27), pages 22-33.
    4. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    5. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    6. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    7. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    8. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    9. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    10. Megan Devonald & Nicola Jones & Sally Youssef, 2022. "‘We Have No Hope for Anything’: Exploring Interconnected Economic, Social and Environmental Risks to Adolescents in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    12. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Shiferaw, Bekele & Holden, Stein, 1999. "Soil Erosion and Smallholders' Conservation Decisions in the Highlands of Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 739-752, April.
    14. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    16. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    17. Christoph M. Schmidt & Nils aus dem Moore, 2014. "Wie geht es uns? Die W3-Indikatoren für eine neue Wohlstandsmessung," RWI Positionen, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, pages 16, 03.
    18. Katundu Imasiku & Valerie M. Thomas & Etienne Ntagwirumugara, 2020. "Unpacking Ecological Stress from Economic Activities for Sustainability and Resource Optimization in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    20. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:9:p:5745-5762:d:39742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.