IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2907-d1619935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Long-Term Soil System Use and Diversified Fertilization on the Sustainability of the Soil Fertility—Organic Matter and Selected Trace Elements

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Andrzejewska

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Science, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Maria Biber

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Science, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

It has been assumed that the long-term impact of a diversified soil use system (SUS) and the continuous application of manure and/or mineral fertilizers (NPK) affects the sustainability of soil fertility components. This influence is manifested through the content and distribution of nutrients, as well as some bioavailable heavy metals in the soil. This hypothesis was verified in 2022 in a long-term field experiment that started in 1957. It consisted of a seven-course crop rotation: potato–spring barley–winter triticale–alfalfa–alfalfa–winter wheat–winter rye and monocultures of these crops plus black fallow. The studies were carried out on three separate fields: black fallow (BF), winter wheat grown in monoculture (WW-MO), and crop rotation (WW-CR). Each of these experimental objects consists of five fertilizer variants (FVs) fertilized in the same way every year: absolute control (AC)—variant without fertilizers for 75 years; farmyard manure—FM; mineral fertilizers—NPK; mixed variant—NPK + FM; mineral fertilizers plus annually applied lime—NPK + L. The second factor was the soil layer: 0.0–0.3 m, 0.3–0.6 m, or 0.6–0.9 m. The obtained results clearly indicate that long-term fertilization with NPK + FM, especially in rotation with legumes, strengthens the eluviation/illuviation processes, decreasing the sustainability of soil fertility. Liming is a factor stabilizing the content and distribution of silt and clay particles in the soil. The key factor determining the content and distribution of micronutrients and heavy metals in the soil was the content of organic carbon (C org ). Its content decreased in the following order: WW-CR (13.2 ± 5.8) ≥ WW-MO (12.3 ± 6.9) > BF (6.6 ± 2.8 g·kg −1 ). The large variability resulted from a distribution trend with soil depth, which increased as follows: MO ≥ CR > BF. FVs with FM had the highest C org content. NPK, regardless of the long-term soil use system (SUS), had the lowest content. Among the elements studied, the key one impacting the content of both micronutrients and heavy metals was iron (Fe). The Fe content decreased in the order BL (100%) > WW-MO (90.5%) > WW-CR (85%). The opposite tendency was found for the remaining elements, the content of which was consistent with the content of C org , which was the highest in CR. The strongest impact of Fe, modified by the SUS, was found for Zn, Pb, and Cd. Despite the differences observed between SUSs, fertilization variants, and soil layers, the content of Fe and Mn was in the medium class, while Zn and Cu were in the high class of availability. The content of Ni was the highest for NPK + FM in WW-CR. The content of Pb was weakly affected by the long-term SUS but showed a strong tendency for accumulation in the topsoil layer. The content of Cd was the highest in BF, where it exceeded the threshold of 0.27 mg·kg −1 . The long-term diversified SUS, as the main factor determining the sustainability of soil fertility, makes it possible to indicate the directions of humus accumulation and its distribution in the soil. It turned out to be a key factor, but in cooperation with Fe, it determined the content of micronutrients and bioavailable heavy metals in the soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Andrzejewska & Maria Biber, 2025. "The Effect of Long-Term Soil System Use and Diversified Fertilization on the Sustainability of the Soil Fertility—Organic Matter and Selected Trace Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-32, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2907-:d:1619935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2907/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2907/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. X. Liu & S.J. Herbert & A.M. Hashemi & X. Zhang & G. Ding, 2006. "Effects of agricultural management on soil organic matter and carbon transformation - a review," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(12), pages 531-543.
    2. Stanislav Malý & Jiří Zbíral & Eva Čižmárová, 2021. "Is Mehlich 3 soil extraction a suitable screening method for determination of some risk elements?," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(9), pages 499-506.
    3. Y.G. Zhang & Y.Y. Zhang & J.P. Cai & P. Zhu & H.J. Gao & Y. Jiang, 2014. "Variation in available micronutrients in black soil after 30-year fertilization treatment," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(9), pages 387-393.
    4. David A. Hennessy, 2006. "On Monoculture and the Structure of Crop Rotations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(4), pages 900-914.
    5. Stanisław Sienkiewicz & Piotr Jarosław Żarczyński & Jadwiga Wierzbowska & Sławomir Józef Krzebietke, 2024. "The Impact of Long-Term Fallowing on the Yield and Quality of Winter Rape and Winter and Spring Wheat," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wade, Tara & Kurkalova, Lyubov & Secchi, Silvia, 2016. "Modeling Field-Level Conservation Tillage Adoption with Aggregate Choice Data," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(2), May.
    2. Liu, Xing & Lehtonen, Heikki & Purola, Tuomo & Pavlova, Yulia & Rötter, Reimund & Palosuo, Taru, 2016. "Dynamic economic modelling of crop rotations with farm management practices under future pest pressure," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 65-76.
    3. Hongli Feng & Bruce A. Babcock, 2010. "Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(3), pages 789-802.
    4. Mauro Vigani & Manuel Gomez-Barbero & Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo, 2015. "The determinants of wheat yields: the role of sustainable innovation, policies and risks in France and Hungary," JRC Research Reports JRC95950, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Thomas, Alban & Chakir, Raja, 2020. "Unintended consequences of environmental policies: the case of set-aside and agricultural intensification," TSE Working Papers 20-1066, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    6. Cláudia Neto & Adriana Catarino & Justino Sobreiro & José das Dores & Manuel Patanita & Alexandra Tomaz & Patrícia Palma, 2024. "Effect of Different Irrigated Crop Successions on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen–Phosphorus–Potassium Budget Under Mediterranean Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Ji, Yongjie & Rabotyagov, Sergey & Kling, Catherine L., 2014. "Crop Choice and Rotational Effects: A Dynamic Model of Land Use in Iowa in Recent Years," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170366, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Lea Piscitelli & Annalisa De Boni & Rocco Roma & Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano, 2023. "Carbon Farming: How to Support Farmers in Choosing the Best Management Strategies for Low-Impact Food Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Ji, Yongjie & Rabotyagov, sergey & Valcu-Lisman, Adriana, 2015. "Estimating Adoption of Cover Crops Using Preferences Revealed by a Dynamic Crop Choice Model," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205799, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Bohan, David & Schmucki, Reto & Abay, Abrha & Termansen, Mette & Bane, Miranda & Charalabiis, Alice & Cong, Rong-Gang & Derocles, Stephane & Dorner, Zita & Forster, Matthieu & Gibert, Caroline & Harro, 2020. "Designing farmer-acceptable rotations that assure ecosystem service provision inthe face of climate change," MPRA Paper 112313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kurkalova, Lyubov A. & Randall, Stephen M., 2015. "Elasticities of demand for energy inputs in crop production: impact of rotation," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205298, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Federico Ciliberto & GianCarlo Moschini & Edward D. Perry, 2019. "Valuing product innovation: genetically engineered varieties in US corn and soybeans," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 615-644, September.
    13. Ibirénoyé Romaric Sodjahin & Fabienne Femenia & Obafemi Philippe Koutchade & A. Carpentier, 2022. "On the economic value of the agronomic effects of crop diversification for farmers: estimation based on farm cost accounting data [Valeur économique des effets agronomiques de la diversification de," Working Papers hal-03639951, HAL.
    14. Ridier, Aude & Chaib, Karim & Roussy, Caroline, 2012. "The adoption of innovative cropping systems under price and production risks: a dynamic model of crop rotation choice," Working Papers 207985, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    15. Renwick, Alan W. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Topp, Kairsty, 2007. "Modelling the Adoption of Crop Rotation Practices in Organic Mixed Farms," Working Papers 109390, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    16. Alain Carpentier & Ibirénoyé Honoré Romaric Sodjahin & Rémy Ballot, 2022. "On the economics of crop rotation diversification. Valuing pre crop and cropping system effects and accounting for opportunity costs," Post-Print hal-04793152, HAL.
    17. Feng, Hongli & Rubin, Ofir & Babcock, Bruce A., 2008. "Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis Versus System-Wide Accounting," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12871, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. X.W. Chen & A.Z. Liang & S.X. Jia & X.P. Zhang & S.C. Wei, 2014. "Impact of tillage on physical characteristics in a Mollisol of Northeast China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(7), pages 309-313.
    19. Kaninda Tshikala, Sam & Fonsah, Esendugue Greg & Boyhan, George & Little, Elizabeth & Gaskin, Julia, 2018. "Crop Rotation Systems for High-Value, Cool-Season Vegetables in the Southern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 49(01), March.
    20. Xiaodong Du & David A. Hennessy & Cindy L. Yu, 2012. "Testing Day's Conjecture that More Nitrogen Decreases Crop Yield Skewness," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 225-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2907-:d:1619935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.