IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2836-d1618362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Border E-Business and Air Quality: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the Perspective of Natural Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Li Qiao

    (Business College, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100025, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Da Huo

    (School of International Business, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tianying Sun

    (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zizhen Zhao

    (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lanjing Ma

    (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zenglin Wu

    (Endicott College of International Studies, Woosong University, Daejeon Metropolitan City 34406, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

As a key initiative to integrate economic growth and green development in the era of the digital economy, the environmental effects of China’s Cross-border E-commerce Comprehensive Pilot Zone (CBEC-PZ) policy are not yet clear. Based on city-level data from 2014 to 2021 in China and leveraging the CBEC-PZ policy as a quasi-natural experiment, this study reveals that the CBEC-PZ policy has significantly enhanced local air quality, with particularly pronounced effects in eastern regions. While the policy did not degrade air quality in surrounding areas, spatial correlations of air quality levels among regions were observed due to atmospheric circulation dynamics. These findings underscore the importance of emphasizing regional coordination in green development within urban governance frameworks. The CEBC-PZ promotes the transformation of the energy structure and the improvement of air quality through reverse innovation, an ecological competitive advantage, and an agile governance mechanism. It is recommended to help synergize sustainable development and high-quality development in terms of strengthening reverse innovation and institutional innovation, expanding cross-regional synergistic governance, and deepening digital-real integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Qiao & Da Huo & Tianying Sun & Zizhen Zhao & Lanjing Ma & Zenglin Wu, 2025. "Cross-Border E-Business and Air Quality: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the Perspective of Natural Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2836-:d:1618362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sourafel Girma & Yundan Gong & Holger Görg, 2016. "Foreign Direct Investment, Access to Finance, and Innovation Activity in Chinese Enterprises," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT Volume 53: World Scientific Studies in International Economics, chapter 5, pages 79-94, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Frota Neto, J. Quariguasi & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & van Heck, E., 2008. "Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 195-208, February.
    3. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Sun, Yunpeng & Gao, Pengpeng & Tian, Wenjuan & Guan, Weimin, 2023. "Green innovation for resource efficiency and sustainability: Empirical analysis and policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Mingliang Zhao & Fangyi Liu & Yingjie Song & Jiangbo Geng, 2020. "Impact of Air Pollution Regulation and Technological Investment on Sustainable Development of Green Economy in Eastern China: Empirical Analysis with Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Boris Begović, 2017. "Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization by Richard Baldwin," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 64(5), pages 645-655.
    7. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Edward Barbier, 2011. "The policy challenges for green economy and sustainable economic development," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(3), pages 233-245, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingliang Zhao & Fangyi Liu & Yingjie Song & Jiangbo Geng, 2020. "Impact of Air Pollution Regulation and Technological Investment on Sustainable Development of Green Economy in Eastern China: Empirical Analysis with Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Simona Iammarino & Francesca Sanna-Randaccio & Maria Savona, 2007. "The perception of obstacles to innovation. Multinational and domestic firms in Italy," Working Papers of BETA 2007-12, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Jean Acheson & Rory Malone, 2020. "Respect Your Elders: Evidence from Ireland’s R&D Tax Credit Reform," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 51(1), pages 105-131.
    5. Pereira Cabral, Bernardo & Lage de Sousa, Filipe & Canêdo-Pinheiro, Mauricio, 2020. "Assessing the impacts of innovation barriers: a qualitative analysis of Brazil's natural resources industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Blind, Knut & Petersen, Sören S. & Riillo, Cesare A.F., 2017. "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 249-264.
    7. Tao Zhang & William J. Nuttall, 2007. "An Agent Based Simulation of Smart Metering Technology Adoption," Working Papers EPRG 0727, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2012. "Process innovation objectives and management complementarities: patterns, drivers, co-adoption and performance effects," MERIT Working Papers 2012-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Mohnen, Pierre & Rosa, Julio, 2001. "Les obstacles à l’innovation dans les industries de services au Canada," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 77(2), pages 231-254, juin.
    10. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2015. "Barriers to innovation: can firm age help lower them?," Working Papers 2015/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    11. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2018. "Barriers to innovation in young and mature firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 181-206, January.
    13. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Pierre Mohnen & Marcel Dagenais, 2002. "Towards an Innovation Intensity Index: The Case of CIS 1 in Denmark and Ireland," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Alfred Kleinknecht & Pierre Mohnen (ed.), Innovation and Firm Performance, chapter 1, pages 3-30, Palgrave Macmillan.
    15. Xu, Mo & Tao, Changqi & Zou, Xianya, 2024. "How do technology and institutional adaptability promote sustainable economic entrepreneurship and growth?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Woojin Yoon & Suyeon Kwon, 2023. "The Impact of Technological and Non-technological Innovative Activities on Technological Competitiveness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Arnaud Le Van, 2020. "Les barrières pour le développement de produits verts et la rentabilité des PME vietnamiennes," Working Papers hal-02482057, HAL.
    18. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2013. "Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1450-1468.
    19. Schaarschmidt, Mario & Kilian, Thomas, 2014. "Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 350-361.
    20. Ramos Ruiz, José & Polo Otero, José & Arrieta Barcasnegras, Aquiles & Vega Cárcamo, Jean, 2018. "Impacto de la innovación en marketing sobre la conducta exportadora de las empresas del sector agroindustrial español || Impact of Marketing Innovation on Exporting Behavior for Spanish Agro-Industry ," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 25(1), pages 54-71, Junio.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2836-:d:1618362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.