IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1798-d1595843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Colombians Towards Biodiversity Regarding COP16

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Javier Bedoya-Rodríguez

    (Grupo de Investigación en Ecología y Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Maestría en Educación Ambiental y Desarrollo Sostenible y Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia
    Grupo de Investigación Dimensiones Territoriales, Fundación Universitaria de Popayán, Popayán 1900, Colombia)

  • Jonathan S. Pelegrín

    (Grupo de Investigación en Ecología y Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Maestría en Educación Ambiental y Desarrollo Sostenible y Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Aura Cristina Gutiérrez-Santana

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Fredy Alejandro Giraldo-Marín

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Alexander Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Libia Carolina Pinzón-Camargo

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Jeffrey Hurtado-Martínez

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Cindy del Carmen Álvarez-Martínez

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Gigliola Yudit Perdomo-Vergara

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • María Fernanda Romero

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

  • Ninfa Rosa Mejía-Florez

    (Programa de Doctorado en Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 7600, Colombia)

Abstract

Research on Colombians’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions (KAP) of biodiversity in the context of COP16 is vital due to Colombia’s significant biodiversity, which comprises about 10% of the world’s total. Understanding public awareness and attitudes towards conservation is essential for effective policy development. This study aims to fill existing research gaps by providing empirical data on how citizens perceive biodiversity and their responsibilities regarding international agreements like COP16. Previous studies have often neglected the impact of significant global events on local populations, making this research particularly relevant. The findings will help policymakers identify misconceptions and areas needing improvement, thereby enhancing conservation initiatives and public engagement. A recent survey revealed that while 80% of Colombians view biodiversity as critical, only a small percentage recognize it as a major global crisis, indicating a disconnect between awareness and action. Many citizens express a willingness to contribute to conservation efforts; however, a significant portion lacks knowledge on how to do so effectively. This study underscores the necessity for educational strategies that are adapted to Colombia’s heterogeneous cultural contexts with the aim of engaging communities. The objective is to galvanize support for biodiversity conservation by enhancing the bond between citizens and their natural heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Javier Bedoya-Rodríguez & Jonathan S. Pelegrín & Aura Cristina Gutiérrez-Santana & Fredy Alejandro Giraldo-Marín & Alexander Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez & Libia Carolina Pinzón-Camargo & Jeffrey Hur, 2025. "Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Colombians Towards Biodiversity Regarding COP16," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1798-:d:1595843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1798/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1798/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernardo, Fátima & Loupa-Ramos, Isabel & Carvalheiro, Joana, 2021. "Are biodiversity perception and attitudes context dependent? A comparative study using a mixed-method approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Mary Douglas & Aaron Wildavsky, 1982. "How Can We Know the Risks We Face? Why Risk Selection Is a Social Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 49-58, June.
    3. Halkos, George & Matsiori, Steriani, 2022. "Understanding the public’s perceptions of the importance, management, and conservation of biodiversity," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 262-270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Debucquet & P. Guillotreau & G. Lazuech & F. Salladarré & J. Troiville, 2020. "Sense of belonging and commitment to a community-supported fishery. The case of Yeu Island, France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 439-459, December.
    2. Robert B. Cumming, 1982. "Risk and the Social Sciences," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 47-48, June.
    3. Jing Shi & Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Michael Siegrist, 2015. "Public Perception of Climate Change: The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(12), pages 2183-2201, December.
    4. Cristina Pronello & Jean-Baptiste Gaborieau, 2018. "Engaging in Pro-Environment Travel Behaviour Research from a Psycho-Social Perspective: A Review of Behavioural Variables and Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Jean Nsabimana & Sabine Henry & Aloys Ndayisenga & Désiré Kubwimana & Olivier Dewitte & François Kervyn & Caroline Michellier, 2023. "Geo-Hydrological Hazard Impacts, Vulnerability and Perception in Bujumbura (Burundi): A High-Resolution Field-Based Assessment in a Sprawling City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Anisimova, Tatiana & Vrontis, Demetris, 2024. "The food you can trust: The moderating role of age in the relationship between consumer values and organic food trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. René Lion & Ree M. Meertens, 2005. "Security or opportunity: the influence of risk-taking tendency on risk information preference," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 283-294, June.
    8. Scovell, Mitchell & McCrea, Rod & Walton, Andrea & Poruschi, Lavinia, 2024. "Local acceptance of solar farms: The impact of energy narratives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    9. D’Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Ioppolo, Giuseppe & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2022. "An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities: Performance measurements and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Dominic Balog‐Way & Katherine McComas & John Besley, 2020. "The Evolving Field of Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2240-2262, November.
    11. René Lion & Ree M. Meertens & Ilja Bot, 2002. "Priorities in Information Desire about Unknown Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 765-776, August.
    12. Rana Saeed Al-Maroof & Khadija Alhumaid & Iman Akour & Said Salloum, 2021. "Factors That Affect E-Learning Platforms after the Spread of COVID-19: Post Acceptance Study," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-20, May.
    13. E. Van Kleef & J. R. Houghton & A. Krystallis & U. Pfenning & G. Rowe & H. Van Dijk & I. A. Van der Lans & L. J. Frewer, 2007. "Consumer Evaluations of Food Risk Management Quality in Europe," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1565-1580, December.
    14. Branden B. Johnson & Brendon Swedlow, 2021. "Cultural Theory's Contributions to Risk Analysis: A Thematic Review with Directions and Resources for Further Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 429-455, March.
    15. Mattia Iannella & Walter De Simone & Francesco Cerasoli & Paola D’Alessandro & Maurizio Biondi, 2021. "A Continental-Scale Connectivity Analysis to Predict Current and Future Colonization Trends of Biofuel Plant’s Pests for Sub-Saharan African Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1798-:d:1595843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.