IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1558-d1590660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Participatory Approaches and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for Barrier Analysis and Ranking in Urban Mobility Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Uroš Kramar

    (Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, 3000 Celje, Slovenia)

  • Marjan Sternad

    (Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, 3000 Celje, Slovenia)

Abstract

This study examines the barriers to implementing sustainable mobility strategies in small municipalities by integrating participatory and multi-criteria decision-making methods. A triangulated approach combines the nominal group technique (NGT), focus groups (FGs), and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to systematically identify, refine, and rank key barriers. The NGT enables stakeholders to list and prioritize barriers individually, ensuring balanced participation. FG discussions then refine and contextualize these barriers, addressing qualitative depth. Finally, the FAHP quantitatively ranks the barriers while accounting for uncertainty in stakeholder judgments. The results highlight systemic constraints, such as financial limitations and regulatory inefficiencies, alongside local challenges like inadequate infrastructure and public resistance. Integrating the NGT, FGs, and the FAHP enhances the analytical rigor by merging structured decision-making with participatory engagement. This methodological innovation strengthens the reliability of barrier assessment and offers a replicable framework for urban mobility planning. The findings underscore the need for locally tailored strategies that balance stakeholder inclusion with structured prioritization, contributing to improved governance in sustainable transport planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Uroš Kramar & Marjan Sternad, 2025. "Integrating Participatory Approaches and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for Barrier Analysis and Ranking in Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1558-:d:1590660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matija Kovačić & Maja Mutavdžija & Krešimir Buntak, 2022. "New Paradigm of Sustainable Urban Mobility: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Peter Loukopoulos & Roland W Scholz, 2004. "Sustainable Future Urban Mobility: Using ‘Area Development Negotiations’ for Scenario Assessment and Participatory Strategic Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2203-2226, December.
    3. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Jianjun Xu & Lijie Yu & Rakesh Gupta, 2020. "Evaluating the Performance of the Government Venture Capital Guiding Fund Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Salvador Garcia-Ayllon & Eloy Hontoria & Nolberto Munier, 2021. "The Contribution of MCDM to SUMP: The Case of Spanish Cities during 2006–2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Federica Cisilino & Alessandro Monteleone, 2020. "Designing Rural Policies for Sustainable Innovations through a Participatory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland W. Scholz, 2018. "Ways and modes of utilizing Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism: new perspectives for decision and sustainability research?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 99-117, March.
    2. Alexander Walter & Roland Scholz, 2007. "Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a comparative evaluation of transport planning projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 195-212, March.
    3. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Road Transport in the EU: Multi-Criteria Analysis of Countries’ Achievements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Rich, Karl M. & Rich, Magda & Dizyee, Kanar, 2018. "Participatory systems approaches for urban and peri-urban agriculture planning: The role of system dynamics and spatial group model building," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 110-123.
    5. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    6. Michal Hrivnák & Peter Moritz & Katarína Melichová & Oľga Roháčiková & Lucia Pospišová, 2021. "Designing the Participation on Local Development Planning: From Literature Review to Adaptive Framework for Practice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Ayse Akbulut Basar, 2024. "Participatory Urban Planning for Social Sustainability: A Combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, with Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats Analysis, and the Technique for Order Prefer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Gülay Demir & Milanko Damjanović & Boško Matović & Radoje Vujadinović, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility by Using Fuzzy-FUCOM and Fuzzy-CoCoSo Methods: The Case of the SUMP Podgorica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Havle, Celal Alpay & Feyzioğlu, Orhan, 2021. "An integrated SWOT based fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS methodology for digital transformation strategy analysis in airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Peter Fieger & Girish Prayag & David Dyason & John Rice & C. Michael Hall, 2023. "Exploring CBD Retail Performance, Recovery and Resilience of a Smart City Following COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Marcele Elisa Fontana & Natallya de Almeida Levino & José Leão & Patrícia Guarnieri & Emerson Philipe Sinesio, 2023. "Risk Analysis of Transport Requalification Projects in the Urban Mobility Problem Caused by a Mining Disaster," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Havle, Celal Alpay & Feyzioğlu, Orhan, 2021. "Digital competency evaluation of low-cost airlines using an integrated IVIF AHP and IVIF VIKOR methodology," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Walter, Alexander I. & Helgenberger, Sebastian & Wiek, Arnim & Scholz, Roland W., 2007. "Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 325-338, November.
    14. Miguel F. Arevalo-Castiblanco & Jaime Pachon & Duvan Tellez-Castro & Eduardo Mojica-Nava, 2023. "Cooperative Cruise Control for Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Bargaining Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "The Sustainability of Smart Cities: Improving Evaluation by Combining MCDA and PROMETHEE," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Pettigrew, Simone & Booth, Leon & Farrar, Victoria & Brown, Julie & Karl, Charles & Godic, Branislava & Vidanaarachchi, Rajith & Thompson, Jason, 2024. "Public support for proposed government policies to optimise the social benefits of autonomous vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 264-270.
    17. Roland W. Scholz & Gerald Steiner, 2022. "The role of transdisciplinarity for mineral economics and mineral resource management: coping with fallacies related to phosphorus in science and practice," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(3), pages 745-763, December.
    18. Siying Yang & Shunyu Ma & Jingjing Lu, 2022. "Can government venture capital guidance funds promote urban innovation? Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 753-770, June.
    19. Navarro-Ligero, Miguel L. & Valenzuela-Montes, Luis Miguel, 2022. "Scenario archetypes in urban transport planning: Insights from the implementation of LRT systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 152-164.
    20. Federica Cisilino & Greta Zilli & Gabriele Zanuttig, 2021. "FADN data to support policymaking: The potential of an additional survey," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1558-:d:1590660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.