IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p974-d1576695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Energy Potential of Agricultural Biomass Residues for Household Use in Rural Areas in the Department La Guajira (Colombia)

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Enrique Rodríguez Romero

    (Doctorado en Ingeniería Energética, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
    Desarrollo de Estudios y Tecnologías Ambientales del Carbono (DESTACAR), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de La Guajira, Riohacha 440001, Colombia)

  • Juan José Cabello Eras

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Universidad de Córdoba, Carrera 6 No. 77-305, Montería 230002, Colombia)

  • Alexis Sagastume Gutierrez

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Facultad de Estudios a Distancia, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Cajicá 250247, Colombia)

  • Jorge Mario Mendoza Fandiño

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Universidad de Córdoba, Carrera 6 No. 77-305, Montería 230002, Colombia)

  • Juan Gabriel Rueda Bayona

    (Natural and Environmental Resources Engineering School (EIDENAR), Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali 25360, Colombia)

Abstract

Cooking with firewood in inefficient stoves primarily affects the rural population in poor and developing countries, usually lacking access to clean and modern energy sources. La Guajira, Colombia, is especially affected, with 40% to 60% of the departmental households relying on firewood, which increases to 80% in rural areas. In the department, only 40.4% of the population have access to natural gas, which drops to 6% in the indigenous reservations, while 68.4% have access to electricity, which reduces to 22% in indigenous reservations. Rural areas with agricultural production in the department can benefit from biomass wastes to address firewood consumption. This study quantified the agricultural biomass waste inventory in La Guajira to assess their availability for energy valorization as cooking fuel or, when possible, for electricity generation. The geolocalization of biomass wastes and rural communities was developed to overlap biomass production with the demand for firewood. Moreover, briquetting, anaerobic digestion, and direct combustion were considered small- and medium-scale options for the energy valorization of biomass wastes. Results highlighted the department’s yearly production of 292,760 to 522,696 t of agricultural biomass wastes between 2010 and 2023. These wastes could yield an estimated 381 to 521 TJ/year of electricity using direct combustion, coinciding with some 21% to 28% of the electricity demand in 2022 in La Guajira. Furthermore, this electricity potential could replace 57% to 78% of the demand for firewood in the department using electric stoves. Moreover, anaerobic digestion could produce from 8.6 to 10 million m 3 /year, enough to replace between 16% and 18% of the demand for firewood using biogas stoves. Finally, briquettes could replace between 28% and 49% of the firewood demand, considering the adoption of improved biomass stoves. Considering that direct combustion and anaerobic digestion technologies would be efficient on the medium scale, briquettes surfaced as the most viable approach at the small scale to take advantage of agricultural wastes to replace firewood in households in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Enrique Rodríguez Romero & Juan José Cabello Eras & Alexis Sagastume Gutierrez & Jorge Mario Mendoza Fandiño & Juan Gabriel Rueda Bayona, 2025. "The Energy Potential of Agricultural Biomass Residues for Household Use in Rural Areas in the Department La Guajira (Colombia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-48, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:974-:d:1576695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Démurger, Sylvie & Fournier, Martin, 2011. "Poverty and firewood consumption: A case study of rural households in northern China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 512-523.
    2. Bot, Bill Vaneck & Axaopoulos, Petros J. & Sakellariou, Evangelos I. & Sosso, Olivier Thierry & Tamba, Jean Gaston, 2022. "Energetic and economic analysis of biomass briquettes production from agricultural residues," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    3. Akter, Mst. Mahmoda & Surovy, Israt Zahan & Sultana, Nazmin & Faruk, Md. Omar & Gilroyed, Brandon H. & Tijing, Leonard & Arman, & Didar-ul-Alam, Md. & Shon, Ho Kyong & Nam, Sang Yong & Kabir, Mohammad, 2024. "Techno-economics and environmental sustainability of agricultural biomass-based energy potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    4. Nguyen, Thanh Hung & Doan, Quang-Van & Khan, Ansar & Derdouri, Ahmed & Anand, Prashant & Niyogi, Dev, 2024. "The potential of agricultural and livestock wastes as a source of biogas in Vietnam: Energetic, economic and environmental evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    6. Callan, Tim & Nolan, Brian, 1991. "Concepts of Poverty and the Poverty Line," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 243-261.
    7. Navarro-Espinosa, Alejandro & Thomas-Galán, Mauricio, 2023. "Firewood electrification in Chile: effects on household expenditure and energy poverty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Carvalho, Danilo José & Veiga, João Paulo Soto & Bizzo, Waldir Antonio, 2017. "Analysis of energy consumption in three systems for collecting sugarcane straw for use in power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 178-187.
    9. Martillo Aseffe, José Alfonso & Martínez González, Aldemar & Jaén, René Lesme & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2021. "The corn cob gasification-based renewable energy recovery in the life cycle environmental performance of seed-corn supply chain: An Ecuadorian case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1523-1535.
    10. Isa Kabenge & Godfrey Omulo & Noble Banadda & Jeffrey Seay & Ahamada Zziwa & Nicholas Kiggundu, 2018. "Characterization of Banana Peels Wastes as Potential Slow Pyrolysis Feedstock," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Ferrer-Martí, Laia & Ferrer, Ivet & Sánchez, Elena & Garfí, Marianna, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision support tool for the assessment of household biogas digester programmes in rural areas. A case study in Peru," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 74-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victoria Danaan, 2018. "Analysing Poverty in Nigeria through Theoretical Lenses," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Huopana, Tuomas & Song, Han & Kolehmainen, Mikko & Niska, Harri, 2013. "A regional model for sustainable biogas electricity production: A case study from a Finnish province," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 676-686.
    3. Klege, Rebecca A. & Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin & Visser, Martine, 2022. "Tenancy and energy choices in Rwanda. A replication and extension study," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    4. Richard Layte & Brian Nolan & Christopher T. Whelan, 2001. "Reassessing Income and Deprivation Approaches to the Measurement of Poverty in the Republic of Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 32(3), pages 239-261.
    5. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    6. Grzegorz Ślusarz & Barbara Gołębiewska & Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Jarosław Gołębiewski & Dariusz Twaróg & Sebastian Wójcik, 2021. "Regional Diversification of Potential, Production and Efficiency of Use of Biogas and Biomass in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. He, Xiaoping & Reiner, David, 2016. "Electricity demand and basic needs: Empirical evidence from China's households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 212-221.
    8. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Mardones, Cristian, 2021. "Ex-post evaluation and cost-benefit analysis of a heater replacement program implemented in southern Chile," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Zhang, Chen & Sun, Zongxuan, 2017. "Trajectory-based combustion control for renewable fuels in free piston engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 72-83.
    11. Thompson, T.M. & Young, B.R. & Baroutian, S., 2020. "Pelagic Sargassum for energy and fertiliser production in the Caribbean: A case study on Barbados," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Zhang, Shaohui & Guo, Qinxin & Smyth, Russell & Yao, Yao, 2022. "Extreme temperatures and residential electricity consumption: Evidence from Chinese households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Christophe Muller, 2006. "Defining Poverty Lines As a Fraction of Central Tendency," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(3), pages 720-729, January.
    14. Yan Bai & Xingyi Ma & Jing Zhang & Lei Zhang & Jing Bai, 2024. "Energy Efficiency Assessment and Prediction Based on Indicator System, PSO + AHP − FCE Model and Regression Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Zeb, Iftikhar & Ma, Jingwei & Frear, Craig & Zhao, Quanbao & Ndegwa, Pius & Yao, Yiqing & Kafle, Gopi Krishna, 2017. "Recycling separated liquid-effluent to dilute feedstock in anaerobic digestion of dairy manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1144-1151.
    16. Yang, Jing & Song, Kaihui & Hou, Jian & Zhang, Peidong & Wu, Jinhu, 2017. "Temporal and spacial dynamics of bioenergy-related CO2 emissions and underlying forces analysis in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1323-1330.
    17. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    18. Guta, Dawit Diriba, 2014. "Effect of fuelwood scarcity and socio-economic factors on household bio-based energy use and energy substitution in rural Ethiopia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 217-227.
    19. Ulfia A. Lenfers & Julius Weyl & Thomas Clemen, 2018. "Firewood Collection in South Africa: Adaptive Behavior in Social-Ecological Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Anna Lymperatou & Niels B. Rasmussen & Hariklia N. Gavala & Ioannis V. Skiadas, 2021. "Improving the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure through an Optimized Ammonia Treatment: Process Performance, Digestate and Techno-Economic Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:974-:d:1576695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.