IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3269-d1375433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blended Learning Delivery Methods for a Sustainable Learning Environment: A Delphi Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Saleh Alammary

    (College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Jeddah 393453, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 necessitated social distancing. Universities around the world were left with two options: a total suspension or a major reduction in students’ attendance. While the nature of many courses made it very difficult to teach them online, blended learning was the most suitable approach to teach these types of courses. Academics and educational institutions have realized the significance of blended learning not only as a response to immediate disruptions but also as a pivotal element in fostering a sustainable learning environment. However, designing successful blended learning courses requires making challenging decisions regarding the selection of the most appropriate delivery methods to achieve learning outcomes. To support higher education adoption of blended learning, this study identifies and rates the importance of the delivery methods that need consideration when designing a blended learning course. The aim is to assist academics to prioritize their delivery options and provide adaptable and resilient educational models. A Delphi study of two rounds was conducted to identify and rate the delivery methods. An expert panel of 19 academics with extensive experience in course design and online delivery was recruited. The findings indicate that online collaborative work and face-to-face collaborative work should be academics’ first delivery choices. Interestingly, face-to-face instructor-led learning was at the bottom of the list and rated well below all the other delivery methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Saleh Alammary, 2024. "Blended Learning Delivery Methods for a Sustainable Learning Environment: A Delphi Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3269-:d:1375433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Grover & Stephen Emmitt & Alexander Copping, 2020. "Trends in sustainable architectural design in the United Kingdom: A Delphi study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 880-896, July.
    2. Barrios, Maite & Guilera, Georgina & Nuño, Laura & Gómez-Benito, Juana, 2021. "Consensus in the delphi method: What makes a decision change?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Ali Saleh Alammary, 2022. "How to Decide the Proportion of Online to Face-to-Face Components of a Blended Course? A Delphi Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    4. Osman Birgin & Faden Topuz, 2021. "Effect of the GeoGebra software-supported collaborative learning environment on seventh grade students’ geometry achievement, retention and attitudes," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(5), pages 474-494, September.
    5. Sangeeth Ramalingam & Melor Md Yunus & Harwati Hashim, 2022. "Blended Learning Strategies for Sustainable English as a Second Language Education: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Saleh Alammary, 2024. "Optimizing Components Selection in Blended Learning: Toward Sustainable Students Engagement and Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Indra Abeysekera & Emily Sunga & Avelino Gonzales & Raul David, 2024. "The Effect of Cognitive Load on Learning Memory of Online Learning Accounting Students in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Muharman Lubis & Muhammad Azani Hasibuan & Rachmadita Andreswari, 2022. "Satisfaction Measurement in the Blended Learning System of the University: The Literacy Mediated-Discourses (LM-D) Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Carol Nash, 2024. "Naturalistic Decision-Making in Intentional Communities: Insights from Youth, Disabled Persons, and Children on Achieving United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for Equality, Peace, and Justice," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & F. Javier Montalván & Andrés Velastegui-Montoya & Jhon Caicedo-Potosí, 2022. "Vulnerability in a Populated Coastal Zone and Its Influence by Oil Wells in Santa Elena, Ecuador," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Adrián Valledor & Alvaro Olmedo & Carlos J. Hellín & Abdelhamid Tayebi & Salvador Otón-Tortosa & Josefa Gómez, 2023. "The Eclectic Approach in English Language Teaching Applications: A Qualitative Synthesis of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    7. Francisco Torres-Romero & Julio César Acosta-Prado, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practices and Ecological Restoration of the Tropical Dry Forest in Colombia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Shiyuan Gan & Xuejing Yang & Bilal Alatas, 2023. "A Multi-Module Information-Optimized Approach to English Language Teaching and Development in the Context of Smart Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Biljana Kulisic & Bruno Gagnon & Jörg Schweinle & Sam Van Holsbeeck & Mark Brown & Jurica Simurina & Ioannis Dimitriou & Heather McDonald, 2021. "The Contributions of Biomass Supply for Bioenergy in the Post-COVID-19 Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-31, December.
    10. Xu, Jinou & Pero, Margherita & Fabbri, Margherita, 2023. "Unfolding the link between big data analytics and supply chain planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Beiderbeck, Daniel & Evans, Nicolas & Frevel, Nicolas & Schmidt, Sascha L., 2023. "The impact of technology on the future of football – A global Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Lin Huang & Meng-Hsiu Lee, 2023. "A Study on the Relationship Between Socialization of Blended Learning and Motivation Regulation Under Sustainable Development With Teacher Support as the Moderating Variable," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    13. Darmaraj Sakaria & Siti Mistima Maat & Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, 2023. "Examining the Optimal Choice of SEM Statistical Software Packages for Sustainable Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Keren A. Vivas & Ramon E. Vera & Sudipta Dasmohapatra & Ronald Marquez & Sophie Van Schoubroeck & Naycari Forfora & Antonio José Azuaje & Richard B. Phillips & Hasan Jameel & Jason A. Delborne & Danie, 2024. "A Multi-Criteria Approach for Quantifying the Impact of Global Megatrends on the Pulp and Paper Industry: Insights into Digitalization, Social Behavior Change, and Sustainability," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-32, April.
    15. Jon Landeta & Aitziber Lertxundi, 2024. "Quality indicators for Delphi studies," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), March.
    16. Jingyu Liu & Qiong Song & Xiaomin Wang, 2023. "Spatial Morphology Evolution of Rural Settlements in the Lower Yellow River Plain: The Case of Menggang Town in Changyuan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3269-:d:1375433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.