IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12929-d937995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfaction Measurement in the Blended Learning System of the University: The Literacy Mediated-Discourses (LM-D) Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Muharman Lubis

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Azani Hasibuan

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Rachmadita Andreswari

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

Abstract

Effective incorporation of new technologies into the education system has become a basic need in today’s globalized world, especially in adapting life to the new normal, which is seen by an increase in online learning. Thus, a blended learning system (BLS) becomes the alternative solution to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the online learning system by adding certain characteristics from the traditional approach to the online learning system. Therefore, the educational institution still has reluctance to adopt this kind of system as a means to deliver knowledge to the student due to several reasons, such as remote effects, learning progress assessment, alignment of the course roadmap to learning strategy, self-paced environment support, retaining lecturer authenticity, quantifying informal learning, and engagement of the student community. Thus, this study wants to investigate factors that influence the satisfaction of students in terms of using mediated communication consisting of the modules, the channels, and the lecturers as the component to evaluate the understanding of literacy within offline and online classes. In fact, satisfaction is a threshold target for the BLS contribution in bringing the discourses aligned with the demands as well as delivering necessary value for the related users. Interestingly, the results showed Computer Self-Efficacy and Expectation of Quality have valid and reliable value as well significancy within the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Muharman Lubis & Muhammad Azani Hasibuan & Rachmadita Andreswari, 2022. "Satisfaction Measurement in the Blended Learning System of the University: The Literacy Mediated-Discourses (LM-D) Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12929-:d:937995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioanna Pavlidou & Nikolina Dragicevic & Eric Tsui, 2021. "A Multi-Dimensional Hybrid Learning Environment for Business Education: A Knowledge Dynamics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Edwards, José, 2018. "Harry Helson’S Adaptation-Level Theory, Happiness Treadmills, And Behavioral Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Tong Zhou & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Effectiveness Study on Online or Blended Language Learning Based on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Jo-Chi Hsiao & Sunny S. J. Lin, 2022. "How Energy Maintains Social Sustainability of Teachers’ Learning Communities: New Insights from a Blended Professional Learning Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Rigdon, Edward E., 2016. "Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 598-605.
    6. Eva Blondeel & Patricia Everaert & Evelien Opdecam, 2021. "And Then There Was COVID-19: Do the Benefits of Cooperative Learning Disappear When Switching to Online Education?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Theo Dijkstra & Karin Schermelleh-Engel, 2014. "Consistent Partial Least Squares for Nonlinear Structural Equation Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 585-604, October.
    8. Li Zhou & Liwen Chen & Qinman Fan & Yueli Ji, 2019. "Students’ Perception of Using Digital Badges in Blended Learning Classrooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Jude S. Brereton & Kat Young, 2022. "Establishing Social Learning in an Engineering MOOC: Benefits for Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Hisham Dzakiria & Mohd Sobri Don A.Wahab & Hamzah Dato¡¯ Abdul Rahman, 2012. "Action Research on Blended Learning Transformative Potential in Higher Education- Learners¡¯ Perspectives," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(2), pages 125-134, June.
    11. Qiuju Zhong & Ying Wang & Wu Lv & Jie Xu & Yichun Zhang, 2022. "Self-Regulation, Teaching Presence, and Social Presence: Predictors of Students’ Learning Engagement and Persistence in Blended Synchronous Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Nicholas C. Barberis, 2013. "Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 173-196, Winter.
    13. Sangeeth Ramalingam & Melor Md Yunus & Harwati Hashim, 2022. "Blended Learning Strategies for Sustainable English as a Second Language Education: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Santiago Criollo-C & Erick Altamirano-Suarez & Lucía Jaramillo-Villacís & Kevin Vidal-Pacheco & Andrea Guerrero-Arias & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2022. "Sustainable Teaching and Learning through a Mobile Application: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jörg Henseler, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 1-8, January.
    2. Mohammed Alzoraiki & Abd Rahman Ahmad & Ali Ahmed Ateeq & Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji & Qais Almaamari & Baligh Ali Hasan Beshr, 2023. "Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Éva Berde & Emese Kovács & Muyassar Kurbanova, 2023. "The two‐sided paradox of ageism during the COVID‐19 pandemic: The cases of Hungary, Tunisia and Uzbekistan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 606-625, April.
    4. Mark T. Kanazawa, 2019. "Transaction Costs in Water Transfers: The issue of local control," Working Papers 2019-01, Carleton College, Department of Economics.
    5. José F. Tudón M., 2019. "Perception, utility, and evolution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 7(2), pages 191-208, December.
    6. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Köster, Mats, 2017. "Local thinking and skewness preferences," DICE Discussion Papers 248, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    7. Stephen Jarvis & Olivier Deschenes & Akshaya Jha, 2022. "The Private and External Costs of Germany’s Nuclear Phase-Out," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(3), pages 1311-1346.
    8. Shoshan, Vered & Hazan, Tamir & Plonsky, Ori, 2023. "BEAST-Net: Learning novel behavioral insights using a neural network adaptation of a behavioral model," OSF Preprints kaeny, Center for Open Science.
    9. Baier-Fuentes, Hugo & Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson A. & Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria & Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, 2023. "Bricolage as an effective tool for the survival of owner-managed SMEs during crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Carolin Bock & Maximilian Schmidt, 2015. "Should I stay, or should I go? – How fund dynamics influence venture capital exit decisions," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 68-82, November.
    11. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    12. Hong, Yan-Zhen & Su, Yi-Ju & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2023. "Analyzing the relationship between income and life satisfaction of Forest farm households - a behavioral economics approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Karagözoğlu, Emin & Keskin, Kerim, 2024. "Consideration sets and reference points in a dynamic bargaining game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 381-403.
    14. Felici, Marco & Kenny, Geoff & Friz, Roberta, 2023. "Consumer savings behaviour at low and negative interest rates," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Klein, Martin & Deissenroth, Marc, 2017. "When do households invest in solar photovoltaics? An application of prospect theory," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 270-278.
    16. Dominika Czyz & Karolina Safarzynska, 2023. "Catastrophic Damages and the Optimal Carbon Tax Under Loss Aversion," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(2), pages 303-340, June.
    17. Alex Imas & Sally Sadoff & Anya Samek, 2017. "Do People Anticipate Loss Aversion?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1271-1284, May.
    18. José Roberto Frega & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Carlos Olavo Quandt & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2018. "Relationships Among Knowledge Management, Organisational Innovativeness and Performance: Covariance-Based Versus Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modelling," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & José Luis Lizcano-Álvarez, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: Sources of Competitiveness and Legitimacy in Organizations’ Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    20. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12929-:d:937995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.