IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2336-d1355317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Way to Attract Digital Nomads to Tourist Destinations in the New Normal Era

Author

Listed:
  • Yunho Ji

    (College of Business Administration, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • Sang-Min Kim

    (Future Business Division, Gangwon Technopark, Chuncheon 24206, Republic of Korea)

  • YoungJun Kim

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In the new normal era, digital nomads are poised to play a pivotal role in driving innovation and revitalizing local economies. Their unique lifestyle and skillset can contribute to positive social and cultural changes, making them valuable assets in shaping the future of work and society. This study explores the characteristics of digital nomads based on remote work and seeks policy ways to attract digital nomads to tourist attractions. Focus group interviews (FGIs) were intended to establish policies related to digital nomads’ tourist sites in the new normal era and to provide implications for strategies to revitalize digital nomads. Each FGI’s panel consists of eight people working for working-level officials, government officials, and public organizations, and it was held three times in about two months, from January to February 2023. FGIs consist of four areas: ‘activating local tourism’, ‘digital transformation’, ‘development of wellness contents’, and ‘creating a settlement environment’. Moreover, eight strategic topics and 24 strategic tasks were derived from each strategic category. Seeking regional attraction strategies for digital nomads is meaningful in responding to paradigm shifts in the new normal era and exploring sustainable local ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunho Ji & Sang-Min Kim & YoungJun Kim, 2024. "A Way to Attract Digital Nomads to Tourist Destinations in the New Normal Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2336-:d:1355317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Hölzel & Kai-Hendrik Kolsch & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Location of Coworking Spaces (CWSs) Regarding Vicinity, Land Use and Points of Interest (POIs)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-32, February.
    2. Minna Halme, 2001. "Learning for sustainable development in tourism networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 100-114, March.
    3. Gloria Guidetti & Michela Cortini & Stefania Fantinelli & Teresa Di Fiore & Teresa Galanti, 2022. "Safety Management and Wellbeing during COVID-19: A Pilot Study in the Manufactory Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Claire Colomb & Nick Gallent, 2022. "Post-COVID-19 mobilities and the housing crisis in European urban and rural destinations. Policy challenges and research agenda," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 624-641, September.
    5. Massaro, Maria & Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "Why is South Korea at the forefront of 5G? Insights from technology systems theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josefin Borg & Anna Yström, 2020. "Collaborating for energy efficiency in Swedish shipping industry: interrelating practice and challenges," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4289-4310, June.
    2. Mateusz Naramski & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Configuring a Trust-based Inter-organizational Cooperation Network for Post-industrial Tourist Organizations on a Tourist Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Frans Melissen & Andrew Ngawenja Mzembe & Uwafiokun Idemudia & Yvonne Novakovic, 2018. "Institutional Antecedents of the Corporate Social Responsibility Narrative in the Developing World Context: Implications for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 657-676, September.
    5. Khoa T. Tran & Phuong V. Nguyen, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Findings from the Vietnamese Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Nikolay Sterev & Kostadin Kostadinov & Daniel Yordanov & Tsvetelina Yorgova, 2023. "Open Entrepreneurial Academic Centres," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 116-134.
    7. Michael Cabanillas-Carbonell & Jorge Pérez-Martínez & Jaime A. Yáñez, 2023. "5G Technology in the Digital Transformation of Healthcare, a Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Sungsoo Pyo, 2009. "Measuring tourism chain performance," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(10), pages 1669-1682, December.
    9. Andrew Peterman & Arno Kourula & Raymond Levitt, 2020. "Organizational roles in a sustainability alliance network," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3314-3330, December.
    10. Michał Roman & Kumar Bhatta & Monika Roman & Prakash Gautam, 2021. "Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Travel Decision-Making of Poles and Nepalis during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    12. Flavio Boccia & Roberta Di Gennaro & Pasquale Sarnacchiaro & Virginia Sarno, 2020. "Tourism satisfaction and perspectives: an exploratory study in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1565-1576, December.
    13. Ruggieri, Giovanni & Iannolino, Salvatore & Baggio, Rodolfo, 2022. "Tourism destination brokers: A network analytic approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Michał Roman & Arkadiusz Niedziółka & Andrzej Krasnodębski, 2020. "Respondents’ Involvement in Tourist Activities at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Blind, Knut & Niebel, Crispin, 2022. "5G roll-out failures addressed by innovation policies in the EU," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    16. Volgger, Michael & Pechlaner, Harald, 2014. "Requirements for destination management organizations in destination governance: Understanding DMO success," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 64-75.
    17. Bertella, Giovanna & Lupini, Sara & Rossi Romanelli, Cecilia & Font, Xavier, 2021. "Workshop methodology design: Innovation-oriented participatory processes for sustainability," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2024. "Exploring killer domains to create new value: A comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    19. Liu, Yu-li & Tian, Li & Li, Changyan & Wu, Yanfei, 2024. "Analyzing the competitiveness and strategies of Chinese mobile network operators in the 5G era," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    20. Mari-Isabella Stan, 2022. "The influence of the real estate market on the economic development of Constanta County," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 38(1), pages 805-817, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2336-:d:1355317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.