IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2278-d1353949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on the Environmental Performance of Manufacturing Firms Considering Institutional Pressure as a Moderator

Author

Listed:
  • Samera Nazir

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Li Zhaolei

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Saqib Mehmood

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Zarish Nazir

    (Department of Economics, University of Kotli Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Kotli 11100, Pakistan)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of green supply chain management practices on the environmental performance of manufacturing firms, with a specific focus on understanding how institutional pressure moderated this relationship. The research design encompassed a holistic approach, incorporating an in-depth examination of the current literature and data collection via a well-structured questionnaire. Random sampling was utilized to gather data from manufacturing companies in Pakistan, and the data analysis employed PLS-SEM. The findings revealed a significant relationship between GSCM practices and the environmental performance of manufacturing firms. Moreover, the study identified that institutional pressure played a moderating role, influencing the strength of this relationship. Notably, the impact of GSCM practices on environmental performance varied under different levels of institutional pressure. This research underscored the importance of considering institutional pressure in understanding the link between GSCM practices and environmental performance. The implications extended to academics and practitioners, providing insights into the nuanced dynamics of sustainable practices in manufacturing settings. Practical implications involved tailoring GSCM strategies based on varying degrees of institutional pressure for optimal environmental outcomes. The original contribution of this study lies in its comprehensive exploration of the interplay between GSCM practices, institutional pressure, and environmental performance. By incorporating institutional pressure as a moderator, the research provided a nuanced understanding of how external influences shaped the effectiveness of GSCM in fostering ecological sustainability within manufacturing firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Samera Nazir & Li Zhaolei & Saqib Mehmood & Zarish Nazir, 2024. "Impact of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on the Environmental Performance of Manufacturing Firms Considering Institutional Pressure as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2278-:d:1353949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osama Khassawneh & Hamzah Elrehail, 2022. "The Effect of Participative Leadership Style on Employees’ Performance: The Contingent Role of Institutional Theory," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Hoyoung Lee, 2020. "The Role of Environmental Uncertainty, Green HRM and Green SCM in Influencing Organization s Energy Efficacy and Environmental Performance," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 332-339.
    3. Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz & Beatriz Blanco & Juan A. Marin-Garcia & Elsa Diez-Busto, 2020. "Scoping Review of Kaizen and Green Practices: State of the Art and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Giudice, Manlio Del & Chierici, Roberto & Graziano, Domenico, 2020. "Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Rakesh Kumar Malviya & Ravi Kant & Ashim Dutta Gupta, 2018. "Evaluation and Selection of Sustainable Strategy for Green Supply Chain Management Implementation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 475-502, May.
    7. Defeng Yang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Wei Jiang, 2019. "Environmental Strategy, Institutional Force, and Innovation Capability: A Managerial Cognition Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1147-1161, November.
    8. Jörn‐Henrik Thun & Andrea Müller, 2010. "An empirical analysis of green supply chain management in the German automotive industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 119-132, February.
    9. Sher Jahan Khan & Puneet Kaur & Fauzia Jabeen & Amandeep Dhir, 2021. "Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3273-3296, November.
    10. Mannekote, Jagadeesh K. & Kailas, Satish V. & Venkatesh, K. & Kathyayini, N., 2018. "Environmentally friendly functional fluids from renewable and sustainable sources-A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1787-1801.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuyen PHAM, 2024. "Catalyzing Economic And Environmental Insights: Applications Of Implan'S Environmentally Extended Input-Output (Eeio) Modeling For Energy Production Scenarios," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 99-106, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carballo-Penela, Adolfo & Ruzo-Sanmartín, Emilio & Álvarez-González, Paula & Paillé, Pascal, 2023. "How do GHRM practices influence firms’ economic performance? A meta-analytic investigation of the role of GSCM and environmental performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rui Tadashi Yoshino & Regina Negri Pagani, 2019. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer Influencing the Process of Innovation in Green Supply Chain Management: A Multicriteria Model Based on the DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, June.
    4. Stanley Y. B. Huang & Chih-Wen Ting & Ming-Way Li, 2021. "The Effects of Green Transformational Leadership on Adoption of Environmentally Proactive Strategies: The Mediating Role of Green Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Helene Seidel-Sterzik & Sarah McLaren & Elena Garnevska, 2018. "Effective Life Cycle Management in SMEs: Use of a Sector-Based Approach to Overcome Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "Measuring the Environmental Maturity of the Supply Chain Finance: A Big Data-Based Multi-Criteria Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Marco Fasan & Elise Soerger Zaro & Claudio Soerger Zaro & Barbara Porco & Riccardo Tiscini, 2021. "An empirical analysis: Did green supply chain management alleviate the effects of COVID‐19?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2702-2712, July.
    8. Idris Oyewale Oyelakin & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2022. "Does ISO 14001 and Green Servitization Provide a Push Factor for Sustainable Performance? A Study of Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Lisa Melander, 2017. "Achieving Sustainable Development by Collaborating in Green Product Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1095-1109, December.
    10. Liu, Junjun & Hu, Houbao & Tong, Xun & Zhu, Qinghua, 2020. "Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. M. K. Dhillon & P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan & H. Amar & F. Sher & S. Ahmed, 2023. "Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Paula Benevene & Ilaria Buonomo, 2020. "Green Human Resource Management: An Evidence-Based Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    13. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Harney, Brian, 2021. "Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-88.
    14. Kamala kanta Muduli & Sunil Luthra & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Satyabrata Aich & Julio Cesar Ferro de Guimarães, 2020. "Environmental management and the “soft side” of organisations: Discovering the most relevant behavioural factors in green supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1647-1665, May.
    15. Akintunde Olayeni & Anastasia Ogbo & Henry Okwo & Benjamin Chukwu & Chuka Ifediora & Charity Ezenwakwelu, 2021. "Green Strategy Effect on Financial and Environmental Performance: A Mediation Analysis of Product Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Forcadell, Francisco Javier & Úbeda, Fernando & Aracil, Elisa, 2021. "Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on innovativeness of spanish industrial SMEs✰,✰✰,★,★★," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Siems, Erik & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Roberto Chavez & Wantao Yu & Mengying Feng & Frank Wiengarten, 2016. "The Effect of Customer‐Centric Green Supply Chain Management on Operational Performance and Customer Satisfaction," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 205-220, March.
    19. Fatih Uslu & Ali Keles & Arif Aytekin & Ozgur Yayla & Huseyin Keles & Gozde Seval Ergun & Abdullah Tarinc, 2023. "Effect of Green Human Resource Management on Green Psychological Climate and Environmental Green Behavior of Hotel Employees: The Moderator Roles of Environmental Sensitivity and Altruism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Jabbour, Charbel & Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Arantes, Ariana Fernandes, 2014. "Mixed methodology to analyze the relationship between maturity of environmental management and the adoption of green supply chain management in Brazil," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 255-267.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2278-:d:1353949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.