IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1655-d1340439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Effective Are Palm-Fiber-Based Erosion Control Blankets (ECB) against Natural Rainfall?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad Jahja

    (Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Gorontalo 96128, Indonesia)

  • Ali Mudatstsir

    (Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Gorontalo 96128, Indonesia)

  • Idawati Supu

    (Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Gorontalo 96128, Indonesia)

  • Yayu Indriati Arifin

    (Department of Geological Engineering, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Jl. Baharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Moutong, Gorontalo 96128, Indonesia)

  • Jayanti Rauf

    (Department of Geological Engineering, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Jl. Baharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Moutong, Gorontalo 96128, Indonesia)

  • Masayuki Sakakibara

    (Department of Earth Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Ehime, Japan
    Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN), 457-4 Kamigamo Motoyama, Kita Ward, Kyoto 603-8047, Kyoto, Japan)

  • Tsutomu Yamaguchi

    (ESPEC MIC Corporation, 1-233-1, Omido, Oguchi-cho, Niwa-gun, Nagoya 480-0138, Aichi, Japan)

  • Andi Patiware Metaragakusuma

    (Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN), 457-4 Kamigamo Motoyama, Kita Ward, Kyoto 603-8047, Kyoto, Japan)

  • Ivana Butolo

    (Regional Planning, Research and Development Agency of Gorontalo Province, Gorontalo 96135, Indonesia)

Abstract

Rainfall-induced soil erosion is a significant environmental issue that can lead to soil degradation and loss of vegetation. The estimated global annual loss increased by 2.5% over 11 years, from 35 billion tons in 2001 to 35.9 billion tons in 2012, mainly due to spatial changes. Indonesia is predicted to be among the largest and most intensively eroded regions among countries with higher soil erosion, regarded as hot-spots higher than 20 Mg yr −1 ha −1 . Due to climate change, natural rainfall patterns in the tropical regions have been subject to change, with a lower number of rainy days and increased intensity of precipitation. Such changes trigger more soil erosion due to heavier rainfall kicking up dried soil particles that are exposed in the bare embankments. Unfortunately, there is no prevention available in developing countries due to the lack of availability and high prices of mitigation techniques such as terraces and covering areas with geotextiles or blankets. Erosion control blankets (ECBs) have emerged as a potential solution to mitigate soil erosion. This research article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sugar-palm-fiber-based ECB in reducing soil erosion caused by natural rainfall. The study investigates the effectiveness of sugar-palm-based ECB in protecting against erosion at the designated embankment. During the three months of typical rainy seasons (February to April 2023), total eroded mass (kg) was collected and measured from two adjacent microplots (10 m 2 each), one covered with ECB and the other one left as uncovered soil (bare soil). The results indicate that eroded mass is proportional to rainfall, with coefficients of 0.4 and 0.04 for bare soil and ECB-covered embankments, respectively. The total soil loss recorded during the monitoring period was 154.6 kg and 16.7 kg for bare and ECB-covered soil, respectively. The significantly high efficiency of the up to 90% reduction in soil losses was achieved by covering the slope with sugar-palm-fiber-based ECB. The reason for this may be attributed to the intrinsic surface properties of sugar palm fiber ropes and the soil characteristics of the plot area. Sugar palm ( Arenga pinnata ) fiber has higher lignocellulosic contents that produce a perfect combination of strong mechanical properties (higher tensile strength and young modulus) and a higher resistance to weathering processes. Although the cost of production of handmade sugar-palm-fiber-based ECB is now as high as 4 EUR, further reductions in cost production can be achieved by introducing machinery. Compared to typical ECBs which have smaller openings, sugar-palm-based ECB has larger openings that allow for vegetation to grow and provide it with a lower density. As such, we recommend improvements in the quality of palm-fiber-based ECB via the introduction of further automation in the production process, so that the price can be reduced in line with other commercially available natural fibers such as jute and coir.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad Jahja & Ali Mudatstsir & Idawati Supu & Yayu Indriati Arifin & Jayanti Rauf & Masayuki Sakakibara & Tsutomu Yamaguchi & Andi Patiware Metaragakusuma & Ivana Butolo, 2024. "How Effective Are Palm-Fiber-Based Erosion Control Blankets (ECB) against Natural Rainfall?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1655-:d:1340439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciro Apollonio & Andrea Petroselli & Flavia Tauro & Manuela Cecconi & Chiara Biscarini & Claudio Zarotti & Salvatore Grimaldi, 2021. "Hillslope Erosion Mitigation: An Experimental Proof of a Nature-Based Solution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Antonios Mamalakis & James T. Randerson & Jin-Yi Yu & Michael S. Pritchard & Gudrun Magnusdottir & Padhraic Smyth & Paul A. Levine & Sungduk Yu & Efi Foufoula-Georgiou, 2021. "Zonally contrasting shifts of the tropical rain belt in response to climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(2), pages 143-151, February.
    3. Robin Chadwick & Peter Good & Gill Martin & David P. Rowell, 2016. "Large rainfall changes consistently projected over substantial areas of tropical land," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 177-181, February.
    4. Thanh T. Nguyen & Buddhima Indraratna, 2023. "Natural Fibre for Geotechnical Applications: Concepts, Achievements and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Renecleide Santos & Felícia Fonseca & Paula Baptista & Antonio Paz-González & Tomás de Figueiredo, 2023. "Erosion Control Performance of Improved Soil Management in Olive Groves: A Field Experimental Study in NE Portugal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Pasquale Borrelli & David A. Robinson & Larissa R. Fleischer & Emanuele Lugato & Cristiano Ballabio & Christine Alewell & Katrin Meusburger & Sirio Modugno & Brigitta Schütt & Vito Ferro & Vincenzo Ba, 2017. "An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panos Panagos & Pasquale Borrelli & David Robinson, 2020. "FAO calls for actions to reduce global soil erosion," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 789-790, May.
    2. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Banerjee, Onil & Crossman, Neville & Vargas, Renato & Brander, Luke & Verburg, Peter & Cicowiez, Martin & Hauck, Jennifer & McKenzie, Emily, 2020. "Global socio-economic impacts of changes in natural capital and ecosystem services: State of play and new modeling approaches," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Queiroz, Julia & Gasparinetti, Pedro & Bakker, Leonardo B. & Lobo, Felipe & Nagel, Gustavo, 2022. "Socioeconomic cost of dredge boat gold mining in the Tapajós basin, eastern Amazon," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. da Silva, Antonio Samuel Alves & Stosic, Tatijana & Arsenić, Ilija & Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar & Stosic, Borko, 2023. "Multifractal analysis of standardized precipitation index in Northeast Brazil," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Zheng, Haijin & Nie, Xiaofei & Liu, Zhao & Mo, Minghao & Song, Yuejun, 2021. "Identifying optimal ridge practices under different rainfall types on runoff and soil loss from sloping farmland in a humid subtropical region of Southern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Caterina Samela & Vito Imbrenda & Rosa Coluzzi & Letizia Pace & Tiziana Simoniello & Maria Lanfredi, 2022. "Multi-Decadal Assessment of Soil Loss in a Mediterranean Region Characterized by Contrasting Local Climates," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Ramos Scharrón, Carlos E., 2023. "On the hydro-geomorphology of steepland coffee farming: Runoff and surface erosion," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    9. Qing Li & Yong Zhou & Li Wang & Qian Zuo & Siqi Yi & Jingyi Liu & Xueping Su & Tao Xu & Yan Jiang, 2021. "The Link between Landscape Characteristics and Soil Losses Rates over a Range of Spatiotemporal Scales: Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Jiyun Li & Yong Zhou & Qing Li & Siqi Yi & Lina Peng, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Land Use Changes on the Landscape Pattern and Soil Erosion of Western Hubei Province from 2000 to 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Wen, Xiaojie & Yao, Shunbo & Sauer, Johannes, 2022. "Shadow prices and abatement cost of soil erosion in Shaanxi Province, China: Convex expectile regression approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. McCartney, Matthew & Rex, William & Yu, Winston & Uhlenbrook, Stefan & von Gnechten, Rachel, 2022. "Change in global freshwater storage," IWMI Reports 329159, International Water Management Institute.
    15. Langhans, Kelley E. & Schmitt, Rafael J.P. & Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca & Anderson, Christopher B. & Vargas Bolaños, Christian & Vargas Cabezas, Fermin & Dirzo, Rodolfo & Goldstein, Jesse A. & Horangic, , 2022. "Modeling multiple ecosystem services and beneficiaries of riparian reforestation in Costa Rica," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Pietro Salvaneschi & Antonio Pica & Ciro Apollonio & Teodoro Andrisano & Massimo Pecci & Andrea Petroselli & Bartolomeo Schirone, 2024. "Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Ralph Trancoso & Jozef Syktus & Richard P. Allan & Jacky Croke & Ove Hoegh-Guldberg & Robin Chadwick, 2024. "Significantly wetter or drier future conditions for one to two thirds of the world’s population," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Clívia Dias Coelho & Demetrius David da Silva & Ricardo Santos Silva Amorim & Bruno Nery Fernandes Vasconcelos & Ernani Lopes Possato & Elpídio Inácio Fernandes Filho & Pedro Christo Brandão & José Am, 2024. "Development and Application of an Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI) for Identifying Priority Restoration Areas in the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Bunga Ludmila Rendrarpoetri & Ernan Rustiadi & Akhmad Fauzi & Andrea Emma Pravitasari, 2024. "Sustainability Assessment of the Upstream Bengawan Solo Watershed in Wonogiri Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Chao Yang & Jianrong Fan & Jiali Liu & Fubao Xu & Xiyu Zhang, 2021. "Evaluating the Dominant Controls of Water Erosion in Three Dry Valley Types Using the RUSLE and Geodetector Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1655-:d:1340439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.