IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11215-d1548953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saying Is Believing: How Do Digital Disclosure Anomalies Affect Corporate Innovation Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Zhirui Zhang

    (School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Yi Fu

    (School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Xiaoyin Liang

    (School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Liang Jiang

    (Fujian Key Laboratory of Financial Information Processing, Putian University, Putian 351100, China)

Abstract

Digital transformation has become a new driving force for corporate development, widely embraced by managers. However, in the actual digital transformation process, some companies’ performances are characterized by “more talk, less action”. To measure the phenomenon, this paper innovatively constructs the Digital Disclosure Anomaly (DDA) indicator using Chinese A-share listed companies’ data from 2013 to 2021 and examines the impact of DDA on corporate innovation efficiency by Saying is Believing theory. We find that DDAs show a long-term negative impact on corporate innovation efficiency. Our mechanism analysis suggests that DDAs reduce innovation efficiency through resource misallocation, which is driven by two mechanisms: the manager squandering effect and the inefficient investment effect. Our results suggest that DDAs are harmful for corporate innovation efficiency by the Saying is Believing (SIB) effect and corporate DDA behavior is detrimental to sustainability in digital economy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhirui Zhang & Yi Fu & Xiaoyin Liang & Liang Jiang, 2024. "Saying Is Believing: How Do Digital Disclosure Anomalies Affect Corporate Innovation Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11215-:d:1548953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwer S. Ahmed & Scott Duellman, 2013. "Managerial Overconfidence and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Mo, Yan & Liu, Xiaotong, 2023. "Climate policy uncertainty and digital transformation of enterprise—Evidence from China," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Ulrike Malmendier & Geoffrey Tate, 2015. "Behavioral CEOs: The Role of Managerial Overconfidence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 37-60, Fall.
    4. Hua, Zesu & Yu, Yihua, 2023. "Digital transformation and the impact of local tournament incentives: Evidence from publicly listed companies in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    5. Zhi-Guang Li & Yanrui Wu & Yao-Kuang Li, 2023. "Technical Founders, Digital Transformation and Corporate Technological Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s STAR Market," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 23-03, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    6. Dominic D. P. Johnson & James H. Fowler, 2011. "The evolution of overconfidence," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7364), pages 317-320, September.
    7. Li, Minghuan & Jiang, Anxuan & Ma, Jianteng, 2023. "Digital transformation and income inequality within enterprises – Evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Zhao, Xiaoxia & Cai, Lianghui, 2023. "Digital transformation and corporate ESG: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    9. Wei, Fang & Yan, Siyao & Su, Daan & Zhang, Minyuan, 2024. "Management tone and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Chinese listed companies' involvement in rural revitalization," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Shang, Yuping & Raza, Syed Ali & Huo, Zhe & Shahzad, Umer & Zhao, Xin, 2023. "Does enterprise digital transformation contribute to the carbon emission reduction? Micro-level evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Kuester, Sabine & Konya-Baumbach, Elisa & Schuhmacher, Monika C., 2018. "Get the show on the road: Go-to-market strategies for e-innovations of start-ups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 65-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Kunz & Lara Sonnenholzner, 2023. "Managerial overconfidence: promoter of or obstacle to organizational resilience?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-128, January.
    2. Nadiah Amirah Nor Azhari & Suhaily Hasnan & Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi, 2020. "The Relationships Between Managerial Overconfidence, Audit Committee, CEO Duality and Audit Quality and Accounting Misstatements," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 18-30, June.
    3. Sumiyana Sumiyana & Ainun Na’im & Albertus H. L. Nugroho & Firdaus Kurniawan, 2023. "Multiple measurements of CEOs’ overconfidence and future earnings management: evidence from Asia-Pacific developing countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Helen X. H. Bao & Steven Haotong Li, 2016. "Overconfidence And Real Estate Research: A Survey Of The Literature," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(04), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Kaplan, Steven N. & Sørensen, Morten & Zakolyukina, Anastasia A., 2022. "What is CEO overconfidence? Evidence from executive assessments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 409-425.
    6. Killins, Robert & Ngo, Thanh & Wang, Hongxia, 2021. "Goodwill impairment and CEO overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    7. Tobias Heizer & Laura R. Rettig, 2020. "Top management team optimism and its influence on firms' financing and investment decisions," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 601-622, October.
    8. Caleb Rawson, 2022. "Manager perception and proprietary investment disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1493-1525, December.
    9. Gao, Peng & Vochozka, Marek & Niu, Siqian, 2024. "The contagion effect of overconfidence in business group," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Qiao, Lu & Adegbite, Emmanuel & Nguyen, Tam Huy, 2022. "Chief financial officer overconfidence and stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Andrei Filip & Gerald J. Lobo & Luc Paugam & Hervé Stolowy, 2022. "Disclosures About Key Value Drivers in M&A Announcement Press Releases: An Exploratory Study," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(1), pages 62-104, March.
    12. Jingjing Qian & Xiaomin Zhang & Xiang-Wu Yan & Ning Xu, 2024. "Can Information Consumption Promote the Digital Transformation of Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Cheng, Shulei & Chen, Yongtao & Wang, Kexin & Jia, Lijun, 2024. "Climate policy uncertainty influences carbon emissions in the semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. André Betzer & Inga Bongard & Felix Schweder & Erik Theissen & Christine Volkmann, 2023. "All is not lost that is delayed: overconfidence and investment outcomes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2297-2324, October.
    15. Phua, Kenny & Tham, T. Mandy & Wei, Chishen, 2018. "Are overconfident CEOs better leaders? Evidence from stakeholder commitments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 519-545.
    16. Sawssen Khlifi & Ghazi Zouari, 2021. "The Impact of CEO Overconfidence on Real Earnings Management: Evidence from M&A Transactions," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 402-424, September.
    17. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    18. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    19. Ulrike Malmendier & Vincenzo Pezone & Hui Zheng, 2023. "Managerial Duties and Managerial Biases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3174-3201, June.
    20. Sweldens, Steven & Puntoni, Stefano & Paolacci, Gabriele & Vissers, Maarten, 2014. "The bias in the bias: Comparative optimism as a function of event social undesirability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 229-244.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11215-:d:1548953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.