Author
Listed:
- Robin Taylor
(Central Laboratory, National Nuclear Laboratory, Seascale, Sellafield CA20 1PG, UK)
- William Bodel
(Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)
- Anthony Banford
(Chadwick House, National Nuclear Laboratory, Risley, Warrington WA3 6AE, UK)
- Gregg Butler
(Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)
- Francis Livens
(Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)
Abstract
Many countries, including the United Kingdom, have committed to reaching “net zero” emissions by 2050. To meet this challenge requires urgent deployment of low-carbon energy-generating technologies, not just for electricity generation but also other sectors, including transportation and heating. However, this will only be successful if the other two pillars of sustainability (social and economic impacts) are balanced with the environmental drivers. All energy-generation technologies have benefits and drawbacks, and these must be objectively and fairly assessed using a “level playing field” approach. Nuclear energy has benefits that are complementary to renewables and thus can play a valuable role in delivering large amounts of low-carbon energy globally. However, critics of nuclear energy raise concerns related to safety (and security), radioactive waste management, and economics that have challenged its acceptance as a sustainable energy source in some quarters. Nevertheless, objective consideration of sustainability in global energy needs and the different generating technologies clearly indicate a valuable role for nuclear energy in a sustainable and low-carbon future. It is concluded that nuclear energy should be recognised as “sustainable”, and the analysis shows that energy portfolios incorporating nuclear provide the most sustainable system overall.
Suggested Citation
Robin Taylor & William Bodel & Anthony Banford & Gregg Butler & Francis Livens, 2024.
"Sustainability of Nuclear Energy—A Critical Review from a UK Perspective,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-50, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10952-:d:1543312
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10952-:d:1543312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.