IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10952-d1543312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of Nuclear Energy—A Critical Review from a UK Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Taylor

    (Central Laboratory, National Nuclear Laboratory, Seascale, Sellafield CA20 1PG, UK)

  • William Bodel

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Anthony Banford

    (Chadwick House, National Nuclear Laboratory, Risley, Warrington WA3 6AE, UK)

  • Gregg Butler

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Francis Livens

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Many countries, including the United Kingdom, have committed to reaching “net zero” emissions by 2050. To meet this challenge requires urgent deployment of low-carbon energy-generating technologies, not just for electricity generation but also other sectors, including transportation and heating. However, this will only be successful if the other two pillars of sustainability (social and economic impacts) are balanced with the environmental drivers. All energy-generation technologies have benefits and drawbacks, and these must be objectively and fairly assessed using a “level playing field” approach. Nuclear energy has benefits that are complementary to renewables and thus can play a valuable role in delivering large amounts of low-carbon energy globally. However, critics of nuclear energy raise concerns related to safety (and security), radioactive waste management, and economics that have challenged its acceptance as a sustainable energy source in some quarters. Nevertheless, objective consideration of sustainability in global energy needs and the different generating technologies clearly indicate a valuable role for nuclear energy in a sustainable and low-carbon future. It is concluded that nuclear energy should be recognised as “sustainable”, and the analysis shows that energy portfolios incorporating nuclear provide the most sustainable system overall.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Taylor & William Bodel & Anthony Banford & Gregg Butler & Francis Livens, 2024. "Sustainability of Nuclear Energy—A Critical Review from a UK Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-50, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10952-:d:1543312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsuey-Lin Tsai & Yi-Fu Chiou & Shih-Chin Tsai, 2020. "Overview of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategies and the Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Technologies in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Newbery, D. & Pollitt, M. & Reiner, D. & Taylor, S., 2019. "Financing low-carbon generation in the UK: The hybrid RAB model," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1969, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Alistair F. Holdsworth & Edmund Ireland, 2024. "Navigating the Path of Least Resistance to Sustainable, Widespread Adoption of Nuclear Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Kraan, Oscar & Kramer, Gert Jan & Nikolic, Igor & Chappin, Emile & Koning, Vinzenz, 2019. "Why fully liberalised electricity markets will fail to meet deep decarbonisation targets even with strong carbon pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 99-110.
    5. John J. Burkhardt & Garvin Heath & Elliot Cohen, 2012. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Trough and Tower Concentrating Solar Power Electricity Generation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 93-109, April.
    6. Ethan S. Warner & Garvin A. Heath, 2012. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nuclear Electricity Generation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 73-92, April.
    7. William Bodel & Kevin Hesketh & Grace McGlynn & Juan Matthews & Gregg Butler, 2021. "Generic Feasibility Assessment: Helping to Choose the Nuclear Piece of the Net Zero Jigsaw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Evan D. Sherwin & Jeffrey S. Rutherford & Zhan Zhang & Yuanlei Chen & Erin B. Wetherley & Petr V. Yakovlev & Elena S. F. Berman & Brian B. Jones & Daniel H. Cusworth & Andrew K. Thorpe & Alana K. Ayas, 2024. "US oil and gas system emissions from nearly one million aerial site measurements," Nature, Nature, vol. 627(8003), pages 328-334, March.
    9. Frick, Konor & Wendt, Daniel & Talbot, Paul & Rabiti, Cristian & Boardman, Richard, 2022. "Technoeconomic assessment of hydrogen cogeneration via high temperature steam electrolysis with a light-water reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    10. David D. Hsu & Patrick O’Donoughue & Vasilis Fthenakis & Garvin A. Heath & Hyung Chul Kim & Pamala Sawyer & Jun‐Ki Choi & Damon E. Turney, 2012. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Electricity Generation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 122-135, April.
    11. Jérôme Serp & Christophe Poinssot & Stéphane Bourg, 2017. "Assessment of the Anticipated Environmental Footprint of Future Nuclear Energy Systems. Evidence of the Beneficial Effect of Extensive Recycling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Fangyu Zheng & Chiwei Xiao & Zhen You & Zhiming Feng, 2022. "Evaluating the Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity in Laos Using a Three-Dimensional Tetrahedron Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Jan-Horst Keppler & Stefan Lorenczik, 2020. "Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: 2020 Edition," Working Papers hal-03998435, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Taylor & William Bodel & Laurence Stamford & Gregg Butler, 2022. "A Review of Environmental and Economic Implications of Closing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle—Part One: Wastes and Environmental Impacts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-35, February.
    2. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Bogdan Klepacki & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko, 2024. "Changes in Gross Nuclear Electricity Production in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Elshkaki, Ayman & Graedel, T.E., 2015. "Solar cell metals and their hosts: A tale of oversupply and undersupply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 167-177.
    4. Jiang, Junxia & Gao, Xiaoqing & Lv, Qingquan & Li, Zhenchao & Li, Peidu, 2021. "Observed impacts of utility-scale photovoltaic plant on local air temperature and energy partitioning in the barren areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 157-169.
    5. Tran, Thomas T.D. & Smith, Amanda D., 2018. "Incorporating performance-based global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis into LCOE calculations for emerging renewable energy technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 157-171.
    6. Gamarra, A.R. & Banacloche, S. & Lechon, Y. & del Río, P., 2023. "Assessing the sustainability impacts of concentrated solar power deployment in Europe in the context of global value chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Richard Wallsgrove & Jisuk Woo & Jae-Hyup Lee & Lorraine Akiba, 2021. "The Emerging Potential of Microgrids in the Transition to 100% Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Elshkaki, Ayman & Shen, Lei, 2019. "Energy-material nexus: The impacts of national and international energy scenarios on critical metals use in China up to 2050 and their global implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 903-917.
    9. Elshkaki, Ayman, 2019. "Material-energy-water-carbon nexus in China’s electricity generation system up to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Roberts, M.B. & Bruce, A. & MacGill, I., 2019. "Opportunities and barriers for photovoltaics on multi-unit residential buildings: Reviewing the Australian experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 95-110.
    11. Atif Ali & Theodore W. Koch & Timothy A. Volk & Robert W. Malmsheimer & Mark H. Eisenbies & Danielle Kloster & Tristan R. Brown & Nehan Naim & Obste Therasme, 2022. "The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production in New York State from Distributed Solar Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Steffi Weyand & Carolin Wittich & Liselotte Schebek, 2019. "Environmental Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Technologies: Assessment of the Status Quo and Future Prospects Based on a Meta-Analysis of Life-Cycle Assessment Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Lunardi, Marina M. & Needell, David R. & Bauser, Haley & Phelan, Megan & Atwater, Harry A. & Corkish, Richard, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of tandem LSC-Si devices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Quyen Le Luu & Sonia Longo & Maurizio Cellura & Eleonora Riva Sanseverino & Maria Anna Cusenza & Vincenzo Franzitta, 2020. "A Conceptual Review on Using Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Methodology for the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Harjanne, Atte & Korhonen, Janne M., 2019. "Abandoning the concept of renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 330-340.
    16. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Short-Term Wind Electric Power Forecasting Using a Novel Multi-Stage Intelligent Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Robin Taylor & William Bodel & Gregg Butler, 2022. "A Review of Environmental and Economic Implications of Closing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle—Part Two: Economic Impacts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.
    18. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.
    19. Scarlat, Nicolae & Prussi, Matteo & Padella, Monica, 2022. "Quantification of the carbon intensity of electricity produced and used in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    20. Wang, An & Tu, Ran & Gai, Yijun & Pereira, Lucas G. & Vaughan, J. & Posen, I. Daniel & Miller, Eric J. & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2020. "Capturing uncertainty in emission estimates related to vehicle electrification and implications for metropolitan greenhouse gas emission inventories," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10952-:d:1543312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.