IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10254-d1527598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Adjustment to the Work Mode as Protective Factors to Counteract Exhaustion and Turnover Intention: A Chain Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Petrilli

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Hearth of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Department of Psychology, University Paris Nanterre, 92000 Nanterre, France)

  • Marianna Giunchi

    (Department of Psychology, University Paris Nanterre, 92000 Nanterre, France)

  • Anne-Marie Vonthron

    (Department of Psychology, University Paris Nanterre, 92000 Nanterre, France)

Abstract

In the context of the New Normal and the VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) era, organisations face adjustments to the changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the shifting to new work modes and configurations with their consequences on employees’ wellbeing, in terms of exhaustion, resignation, and quitting tendencies. This study, rooted in the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development, employs a primary prevention perspective to examine a relational factor, the leader–member exchange (LMX), which might shield employees from exhaustion and turnover intention. Specifically, we propose a double-chained mediation model to investigate how high-quality LMX fosters a positive adjustment to employees’ specific work modes, in-person or hybrid work, subsequently reducing employees’ feelings of exhaustion and their intentions to leave the organisation. A convenience sample of 257 Italian employees participated in this study by completing an online self-report survey. Hypotheses were tested using the PROCESS macro in SPSS 25.0 (Model 6). The results indicate that positive LMX and adjustment to the work mode reduce exhaustion and turnover intention; furthermore, they highlight the existence of a more complex dynamic linking LMX to turnover intention through a double-chained mediation of adjustment to the work mode and exhaustion. Indeed, higher LMX quality favours adjustment to the work mode, decreasing employees’ feelings of exhaustion and, in turn, their turnover intention. Specifically, the findings of this study add a novel contribution to the literature on the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development by emphasising the significance of positive LMX in becoming a factor of wellbeing and sustainability in the workplace through the promotion of the adjustment to both in-person and hybrid work modes. Organisations may benefit of this approach to LMX that, through the consideration of employees’ needs, may favour their adjustment to different work modes, thus becoming a sustainable LMX, and a promoter of employees’ wellbeing and retention.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Petrilli & Marianna Giunchi & Anne-Marie Vonthron, 2024. "Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Adjustment to the Work Mode as Protective Factors to Counteract Exhaustion and Turnover Intention: A Chain Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10254-:d:1527598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2023. "The Future Is Hybrid: How Organisations Are Designing and Supporting Sustainable Hybrid Work Models in Post-Pandemic Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Qingqing Liang & Fang Yin, 2024. "Empirical Study on the Relationship between Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Trust, and Team Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper‑Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Correction to: Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 785-787, June.
    4. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper-Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 745-783, June.
    5. Ward van Zoonen & Anu Sivunen & Kirsimarja Blomqvist & Thomas Olsson & Annina Ropponen & Kaisa Henttonen & Matti Vartiainen, 2021. "Factors Influencing Adjustment to Remote Work: Employees’ Initial Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Roselina Ahmad Saufi & Noorshella Binti Che Nawi & P. Yukthamarani Permarupan & Noor Raihani Binti Zainol & Samsidine Aidara & Abdul Samad Kakar & Braveena A/P Jothi, 2023. "Academic Person-Environment Fit towards Sustainable Work-Life Balance and Reduced Turnover Intention Moderated by Job Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Annamaria Di Fabio & José María Peiró, 2018. "Human Capital Sustainability Leadership to Promote Sustainable Development and Healthy Organizations: A New Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    8. Sana Mumtaz & Chris Rowley, 2020. "The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 165-189, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aminjonova, Gulrukhsor & Khasanova, Dilfuzakhon, 2024. "How Perceived CSR Drives Customer Value Co-Creation in E-Commerce: Examining the Moderating Effect of Gender and the Mediating Effect of Satisfaction," SocArXiv 69cdm, Center for Open Science.
    2. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka & Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk & Agata Gawlak, 2024. "Human-Centered Systems Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Sustainable and Inclusive Architectural Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-45, November.
    3. Suchart Tripopsakul, 2024. "The Moderating Roles of Environmental Awareness and Product Knowledge on the Impact of Marketing Mix Elements on Purchase Intention," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 61-69, October.
    4. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Zaibunnisa Siddiqi & Shahzad Nasim & Muhammad Raza & Syed Asad Abbas Rizvi & Nazia Abdul Rehman, 2024. "Does Transformational Leadership Matter for Employee Performance?," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 501-488.
    6. Md. Shahzalal & Azizul Hassan, 2019. "Communicating Sustainability: Using Community Media to Influence Rural People’s Intention to Adopt Sustainable Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Jinjia Liang & Tomio Miwa & Takayuki Morikawa, 2023. "Preferences and Expectations of Japanese Employees toward Telecommuting Frequency in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Alvaro Guitart Martín & Ricardo J. Palomo Zurdo, 2021. "Digital Inability and Social Sustainability in the Face of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Proposal of New Non-Financial Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Annamaria Di Fabio & Maureen E. Kenny, 2018. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: A Key Resource for Promoting Well-Being in a Shifting Work Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    10. Daniela Pajardi & Monia Vagni & Viviana La Spada & Serena Cubico, 2020. "International Cooperation in Developing Countries: Reducing Fatalism and Promoting Self-Efficacy to Ensure Sustainable Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Aleksandra Tokarz & Diana Malinowska, 2019. "From Psychological Theoretical Assumptions to New Research Perspectives in Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Motivation in the Workplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Mar Ortiz-Gómez & Gabriele Giorgi & Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Spanish Short Servant Leadership Survey (SSLS6-3F) among Spanish Workers in Religious Non-Profit Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Minthiva Pitchaya-Auckarakhun, 2024. "The future of work: financial implications of remote and hybrid work models," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 13-38.
    14. Annamaria Di Fabio & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "An Exploratory Study of a New Psychological Instrument for Evaluating Sustainability: The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Annamaria Di Fabio & Donald H. Saklofske, 2019. "Positive Relational Management for Sustainable Development: Beyond Personality Traits—The Contribution of Emotional Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, January.
    16. Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Eugene F. Borokhovski & Dmitry V. Vorontsov, 2023. "Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 695-729, June.
    17. Andrea Svicher & Alessio Gori & Annamaria Di Fabio, 2022. "The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory: A Network Analysis in Italian University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Valentina Sommovigo & Ilaria Setti & Piergiorgio Argentero, 2019. "The Role of Service Providers’ Resilience in Buffering the Negative Impact of Customer Incivility on Service Recovery Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Rawan Alafeshat & Cem Tanova, 2019. "Servant Leadership Style and High-Performance Work System Practices: Pathway to a Sustainable Jordanian Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Aleksandra Kuzior & Olena Arefieva & Alona Kovalchuk & Paulina Brożek & Volodymyr Tytykalo, 2022. "Strategic Guidelines for the Intellectualization of Human Capital in the Context of Innovative Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10254-:d:1527598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.