IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9802-d1517826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human-Centered Systems Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Sustainable and Inclusive Architectural Design

Author

Listed:
  • Stanislav Avsec

    (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva Ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk

    (Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Podchorazych 1, 30-084 Kraków, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Żabicka

    (Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Podchorazych 1, 30-084 Kraków, Poland)

  • Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, Domaszowska 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

  • Agata Gawlak

    (Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 2, 61-138 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Human-centered systems thinking (HCST) can be seen as a promising enabler of effective Industry 5.0. This study primarily examined whether architecture students consider themselves systems thinkers and how this affects their design thinking, digital competency, and engagement in sustainable and inclusive design practices. Next, this study also examined the students’ HCST profiles, their stability, and the roles of digital competency, design thinking, motivation, and risk propensity in human-centered design. Using a person-oriented approach and cluster analysis, a sample of Polish architecture students from three universities ( n = 208) was classified based on their self-perceived HCST ability. Three profiles were identified, namely high, average, and low HCST. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that the HCST profiles differed significantly in terms of design thinking and digital competencies, while multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analysis revealed that perceived intrinsic motivation predicted that students would be more likely to have a high HCST profile. MLR also revealed an undefined role of risk propensity in the context of HCST in inclusive and sustainable architecture design education. The findings indicate that it is essential to recognize and support students with low HCST throughout their education. It is also suggested to change the focus of architecture study programs to promote students’ systems thinking, and to encourage course designers to create novel and tailored technology-enhanced integrated human-centered design and systems thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka & Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk & Agata Gawlak, 2024. "Human-Centered Systems Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Sustainable and Inclusive Architectural Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-45, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9802-:d:1517826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka & Agata Gawlak & Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk, 2023. "Leveraging Systems Thinking, Engagement, and Digital Competencies to Enhance First-Year Architecture Students’ Achievement in Design-Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.
    2. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper‑Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Correction to: Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 785-787, June.
    3. Peter Blokland & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "Safety Science, a Systems Thinking Perspective: From Events to Mental Models and Sustainable Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper-Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 745-783, June.
    5. Fanke Peng & Benjamin Altieri & Todd Hutchinson & Anthony J. Harris & Daniel McLean, 2022. "Design for Social Innovation: A Systemic Design Approach in Creative Higher Education toward Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Barata, João & Kayser, Ina, 2024. "How will the digital twin shape the future of industry 5.0?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brina Kurent & Stanislav Avsec, 2024. "Synergizing Systems Thinking and Technology-Enhanced Learning for Sustainable Education Using the Flow Theory Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-42, October.
    2. Meng Qi & Zulhamri Abdullah & Saiful Nujaimi Abdul Rahman, 2024. "Navigating the Digital Landscape: Evaluating the Impacts of Digital IMC on Building and Maintaining Destination Brand Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Xiaofang Deng & Junkui Li & Lijuan Su & Shan Zhao & Shaofei Jin, 2022. "Human Resource Allocation in the State-Owned Forest Farm of China for the Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Michal Titko & Jozef Ristvej, 2020. "Assessing Importance of Disaster Preparedness Factors for Sustainable Disaster Risk Management: The Case of the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Mahdieh Delikhoon & Esmaeil Zarei & Osiris Valdez Banda & Mohammad Faridan & Ehsanollah Habibi, 2022. "Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Chih-Wen Ting & Hung-Xin Li & Kuei-Hsien Chen & Yue-Shi Lee & Show-Jane Yen, 2024. "How Can Organizational Leadership Promote Environmental Behaviors through Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Adoption? The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Peter Blokland & Genserik Reniers, 2021. "Achieving Organisational Alignment, Safety and Sustainable Performance in Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-35, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9802-:d:1517826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.