IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8057-d1478510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Study on the Relationship between Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Trust, and Team Knowledge Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Qingqing Liang

    (School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Fang Yin

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation, School of Land Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is influenced not only by the attributes of the knowledge itself and the hierarchical differences among knowledge holders but also by micro-level factors such as interpersonal communication and psychological dynamics. As the demands of the new economic environment evolve, the role of knowledge sharing among team members in knowledge management has become increasingly critical. A growing body of research emphasizes the importance of sharing knowledge resources as a means of gaining strategic advantages in enterprises. Previous studies have shown that leadership behavior plays a crucial role in fostering knowledge sharing among team members. However, there is limited research on the specific pathways and mechanisms through which leadership behavior influences knowledge sharing. Additionally, existing research lacks a comprehensive examination of the structure and measurement methods of leader–member exchange (LMX), as well as its impact on employee work outcomes. This study addresses this gap by examining trust relationships through the lenses of social identity and emotional interaction, with trust serving as a mediating variable to explore the impact of leader–subordinate interactions on knowledge sharing behavior. Drawing on the relevant literature, the study focuses on 358 employees, investigating the relationship between LMX as the independent variable, team knowledge sharing as the dependent variable, and employee trust as the mediating factor. The research findings are as follows: (1) The quality of the LMX relationship significantly influences employees’ team knowledge sharing; higher-quality LMX relationships are associated with increased knowledge sharing among subordinates. (2) Employee trust in both leaders and colleagues has a substantial impact on team knowledge sharing, with higher levels of trust positively affecting knowledge sharing behaviors. (3) Employee trust serves as a mediating factor in the relationship between LMX and team knowledge sharing. This study delves into the dynamics between LMX, team knowledge sharing, and trust, providing practical recommendations for strengthening these relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingqing Liang & Fang Yin, 2024. "Empirical Study on the Relationship between Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Trust, and Team Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8057-:d:1478510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miaojie Chen & Mehtab Babar & Ammar Ahmed & Muhammad Irfan, 2023. "Analyzing the Impact of Enterprise Social Media on Employees’ Competency through the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Hamad AlDhaheri & Mohd Faiz Hilmi & Anas Abudaqa & Rashed A. Alzahmi & Gouher Ahmed, 2023. "The relationship between HRM practices, innovation, and employee productivity in UAE public sector: a structural equation modelling approach," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 157-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Zhang & Yuting Yang & Huigang Liang, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Enterprise Social Media in Digital Economy: Research Hotspots and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Panteha Farmanesh & Alla Mostepaniuk & Parisa Gharibi Khoshkar & Riham Alhamdan, 2023. "Fostering Employees’ Job Performance through Sustainable Human Resources Management and Trust in Leaders—A Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Yaoyao Guo & Dongphil Chun & Feng Yin & Yaying Zhou, 2023. "Exploring Motivations and Trust Mechanisms in Knowledge Sharing: The Moderating Role of Social Alienation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8057-:d:1478510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.