IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10174-d1526103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leverage Points for Decelerating Wetland Degradation: A Case Study of the Wetland Agricultural System in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen Jessica Kayendeke

    (Department of Environmental Management, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda
    Stewardship Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Kampala P.O. Box 131718, Uganda)

  • Laura Schmitt Olabisi

    (Department of Community Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Frank Kansiime

    (Department of Environmental Management, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda)

  • David Mfitumukiza

    (Stewardship Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Kampala P.O. Box 131718, Uganda
    Department of Geography, Geo-informatics & Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda)

Abstract

Indiscriminate expansion of agricultural activities into wetlands affects the sustainability of wetland-dependent livelihoods. Systems research is an important tool for identifying and dealing with the underlying drivers of wetland degradation; however, there is limited research employing system tools in Sub-Saharan Africa. This research employed causal loop diagrams and system archetypes to characterize common wetland resource systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, using the wetland agricultural system of Uganda as a case study. Mental models of wetland users were indirectly elicited by interviewing 66 wetland users. Causal loop diagrams were generated to illustrate the multiple, interdependent feedback linkages within the system. The case study wetland is mainly used for farming (40%), vegetation harvesting (26%), and fishing (24%), while other activities like hunting and grazing are carried out by 10% of wetland users. A reinforcing feedback loop was dominant, illustrating how initial encroachment on the wetland to meet livelihood needs can accelerate further encroachment. Based on the dominant loop and current interventions, we characterized the system using three archetypes: tragedy of the commons, shifting the burden, and fixes that fail. A two-pronged approach was proposed, where solutions for decelerating wetland degradation, like restoration activities, can be implemented in the short term while planning long-term measures that take into account the need for alternative livelihoods for wetland-dependent communities and targeting a paradigm shift through continuous sensitization of stakeholders on the benefits of sustainable wetland management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen Jessica Kayendeke & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Frank Kansiime & David Mfitumukiza, 2024. "Leverage Points for Decelerating Wetland Degradation: A Case Study of the Wetland Agricultural System in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10174-:d:1526103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Kin Sibanda & Rufaro Garidzirai & Farai Mushonga & Dorcas Gonese, 2023. "Natural Resource Rents, Institutional Quality, and Environmental Degradation in Resource-Rich Sub-Saharan African Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Yong S. Nyam & Julius H. Kotir & Andries J. Jordaan & Abiodun A. Ogundeji & Adetoso A. Adetoro & Israel R. Orimoloye, 2020. "Towards Understanding and Sustaining Natural Resource Systems through the Systems Perspective: A Systematic Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Wiebe, Keith D. & Claassen, Roger & Gadsby, Dwight M. & House, Robert M., 1998. "Wetlands and Agriculture: Private Interests and Public Benefits," Agricultural Economic Reports 34043, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Sanga, Udita & Sidibé, Amadou & Olabisi, Laura Schmitt, 2021. "Dynamic pathways of barriers and opportunities for food security and climate adaptation in Southern Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Heimlich, Ralph & Claassen, Roger & Peters, Mark, 2001. "Least-cost management of nonpoint source pollution: source reduction versus interception strategies for controlling nitrogen loss in the Mississippi Basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, May.
    2. Musah, Mohammed & Onifade, Stephen Taiwo & Ankrah, Isaac & Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi & Amoako, George Kofi, 2024. "Achieving net-zero emission target in Africa: Are sustainable energy innovations and financialization crucial for environmental sustainability of sub-Saharan African state?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    3. Charles A. Taylor & Hannah Druckenmiller, 2022. "Wetlands, Flooding, and the Clean Water Act," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1334-1363, April.
    4. Dadaser-Celik, Filiz & Coggins, Jay S. & Brezonik, Patrick L. & Stefan, Heinz G., 2009. "The projected costs and benefits of water diversion from and to the Sultan Marshes (Turkey)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1496-1506, March.
    5. Hugo Herrera & Birgit Kopainsky, 2020. "Using system dynamics to support a participatory assessment of resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 342-355, September.
    6. Hoehn, John & Lupi, Frank & Kaplowitz, Michael, 2001. "Experiments in Valuing Wetland Ecosystems," Western Region Archives 321687, Western Region - Western Extension Directors Association (WEDA).
    7. Woodward, Richard T. & Wui, Yong-Suhk, 2001. "The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 257-270, May.
    8. Yi Wang & Zhanguo Zhu & Feng Chu, 2017. "Organic vs. Non-Organic Food Products: Credence and Price Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Ribaudo, Marc & Hansen, LeRoy T. & Hellerstein, Daniel & Greene, Catherine R., 2008. "The Use of Markets To Increase Private Investment in Environmental Stewardship," Economic Research Report 56473, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Steven D. Shultz, 2005. "Evaluating the Acceptance of Wetland Easement Conservation Offers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 259-272.
    11. Collins C. Okolie & Abiodun A. Ogundeji, 2022. "Effect of COVID-19 on agricultural production and food security: A scientometric analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Francesca Galli & Alessio Cavicchi & Gianluca Brunori, 2019. "Food waste reduction and food poverty alleviation: a system dynamics conceptual model," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 289-300, June.
    13. Sahan T. M. Dissanayake & Amy W. Ando, 2014. "Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(2), pages 237-259.
    14. McGarraghy, Seán & Olafsdottir, Gudrun & Kazakov, Rossen & Huber, Élise & Loveluck, William & Gudbrandsdottir, Ingunn Y. & Čechura, Lukáš & Esposito, Gianandrea & Samoggia, Antonella & Aubert, Pierre-, 2022. "Conceptual system dynamics and agent-based modelling simulation of interorganisational fairness in food value chains: Research agenda and case studies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2).
    15. Thanh, To Trung & Song, Nguyen Van & Thanh Huyen, Nguyen Thi & Ha, Le Thanh & Lan Huong, Tran Thi, 2024. "An exploration of linkage between climate-related financial policies and natural rents: Evidence from the global database," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Jonathan Graves & Rama Mohapatra & Nicholas Flatgard, 2020. "Drainage Ditch Berm Delineation Using Lidar Data: A Case Study of Waseca County, Minnesota," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Crepin, Anne-Sophie, 2005. "Incentives for wetland creation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 598-616, November.
    18. Bruce A. Babcock & John C. Beghin & Michael D. Duffy & Hongli Feng & Brent Hueth & Catherine L. Kling & Lyubov A. Kurkalova & Uwe A. Schneider & Silvia Secchi & Quinn Weninger & Jinhua Zhao, 2001. "Conservation Payments: Challenges in Design and Implementation," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 01-bp34, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Radosavljevic, Sonja & Sanga, Udita & Schlüter, Maja, 2024. "Navigating simplicity and complexity of social-ecological systems through a dialogue between dynamical systems and agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 495(C).
    20. Marwa E. Salem & D. Evan Mercer, 2012. "The Economic Value of Mangroves: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10174-:d:1526103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.