IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8538-d1490033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Performance Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Teodora Maria Rusu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Mănăștur Street 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Antonia Odagiu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Mănăștur Street 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Horia Pop

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Mănăștur Street 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Laura Paulette

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Mănăștur Street 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Sustainability reporting is an essential tool for companies and organizations to assess and communicate their sustainability performance. Its importance derives from the need for transparency and accountability to stakeholders, including investors, customers, employees and local communities. The principles underlying an effective sustainability report include integrity, accuracy, comparability and clarity. The main purpose of the sustainability report is to provide a clear view of the economic, social and environmental impact of the organization’s activities, contributing to continuous performance improvement and alignment with international standards. The objective of our study is to analyze sustainability reporting and ESG (environment, social, governance) reporting, key steps and methods for measuring and reporting sustainability, and the sustainability policy criteria and reporting frameworks used internationally (GRI, IIRC, SASB, TCFD, ISO 26000, ISO 14016) in order to identify areas for further development to improve the relevance and effectiveness of sustainability reporting. The results obtained from our study enable a better understanding of how an organization reports its social, economic, and environmental impact, the differences in compliance with the international standards used, the main steps, and sustainability criteria followed. Our research highlights the necessary actions and steps through which sustainability reporting can become a more effective and relevant tool, contributing to real sustainable development and more responsible resource management. The usefulness of this report is reflected in many aspects: it facilitates informed decision making, enhances trust and reputation, helps identify risks and opportunities, and supports sustainable business strategies. The sustainability report is not only a means of reporting but also a catalyst for positive change, promoting responsible business practices and contributing to global sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodora Maria Rusu & Antonia Odagiu & Horia Pop & Laura Paulette, 2024. "Sustainability Performance Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8538-:d:1490033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Allah Ditta & Zeeshan Mahmood & Rehana Kouser, 2023. "The Role of Sustainability Reporting and Governance in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: An International Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Prianto Budi Saptono & Gustofan Mahmud & Intan Pratiwi & Dwi Purwanto & Ismail Khozen & Muhamad Akbar Aditama & Siti Khodijah & Maria Eurelia Wayan & Rina Yuliastuty Asmara & Ferry Jie, 2023. "Development of Climate-Related Disclosure Indicators for Application in Indonesia: A Delphi Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Zahid Yousaf & Magdalena Radulescu & Mohamed Haffar, 2022. "Environmental Performance through Environmental Resources Conservation Efforts: Does Corporate Social Responsibility Authenticity Act as Mediator?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Niki Glaveli & Maria Alexiou & Apostolos Maragos & Anastasia Daskalopoulou & Viktoria Voulgari, 2023. "Assessing the Maturity of Sustainable Business Model and Strategy Reporting under the CSRD Shadow," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    6. Hina Ismail & Muhammad A. Saleem & Sadaf Zahra & Muhammad S. Tufail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. ABM Fazle Rahi & Jeaneth Johansson & Arne Fagerström & Marita Blomkvist, 2022. "Sustainability Reporting and Management Control System: A Structured Literature Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-31, November.
    8. Albertina Paula Monteiro & Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Labour Practice, Decent Work and Human Rights Performance and Reporting: The Impact of Women Managers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 523-542, October.
    9. Cecília Carmo & Inês Correia & Joaquim Leite & Amélia Carvalho, 2023. "Towards the Voluntary Adoption of Integrated Reporting: Drivers, Barriers, and Practices," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Khaled Hussainey, 2022. "The Financial Determinants of Integrated Reporting Disclosure by Jordanian Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Akrum Helfaya & Ahmed Aboud, 2023. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility, Innovation, and Sustainable Business Development Goals”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Banu Dincer & Caner Dincer, 2024. "Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Mathew Kevin Bosi & Nelson Lajuni & Avnner Chardles Wellfren & Thien Sang Lim, 2022. "Sustainability Reporting through Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    2. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Thomä, Jakob & Murray, Clare & Jerosch-Herold, Vincent & Magdanz, Janina, 2019. "Do you manage what you measure? Investor views on the question of climate actions with empirical results from the Swiss pension fund and insurance sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115100, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Lu Xu & Li Xie & Shengjun Mei & Jianli Hao & Yuqian Zhang & Yu Song, 2024. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Stakeholders’ Interests: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Zahid Yousaf & Brutu Mădălina & Daniela Mihai & Hrestic Maria-Luiza & Ștefan Maria Cristina & Popescu Constantin, 2022. "Pollution Reduction as Catalyst between Environmental Resources Conservation Efforts and Sustainable Development: Investigation of Energy Firms in Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Alfonso Siano & Ralph Tench, 2022. "Editorial," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(3), pages 267-270, September.
    8. Alice Klettner & Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma, 2014. "The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 145-165, June.
    9. Xiao Han & Yining Chen & Hehua Zhao, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution, Influencing Factors, and Driving Mechanisms of Environmental Regulation Performance Disparities: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Mazzuca, Maria & Panzera, Elena & Ruberto, Sabrina, 2023. "The investor's participation in social impact bonds," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 349-363.
    11. W. Eric Lee & Amy M. Hageman, 2018. "Talk the Talk or Walk the Walk? An Examination of Sustainability Accounting Implementation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 725-739, October.
    12. Piotr Zientara & Paulina Bohdanowicz-Godfrey & Claire Whitely & Grzegorz Maciejewski, 2020. "A Case Study of LightStay (2010–2017)—Hilton’s Corporate Responsibility Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto & Iliana E. Aguilar-Rodríguez & Carlos Artieda, 2021. "Organizational Culture and Corporate Performance in the Ecuadorian Environment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Gustavo Lannelongue & Oscar Gonzalez-Benito & Javier Gonzalez-Benito, 2014. "Environmental Motivations: The Pathway to Complete Environmental Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 135-147, September.
    15. Iva Glibo & Laura Misener & Joerg Koenigstorfer, 2022. "Strategic Sustainable Development in International Sport Organisations: A Delphi Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Albertina Paula Monteiro & Francisco Barbosa & Amélia Ferreira da Silva & Catarina Cepêda, 2023. "Industry and performance in the Portuguese listed companies: the mediating role of the environmental information disclosure," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 10(4), pages 372-389, June.
    17. Jau-Yang Liu, 2018. "An Internal Control System that Includes Corporate Social Responsibility for Social Sustainability in the New Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Tsalis, Thomas A. & Nikolaou, Ioannis E. & Konstantakopoulou, Fotini & Zhang, Ying & Evangelinos, Konstantinos I., 2020. "Evaluating the corporate environmental profile by analyzing corporate social responsibility reports," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 63-75.
    19. Damjan Maletič & Matjaž Maletič & Basim Al-Najjar & Boštjan Gomišček, 2018. "Development of a Model Linking Physical Asset Management to Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Evgeniya V. Nekhoda & Nurali U. Arabov & Aleksandr L. Bogdanov & Maria V. German & Tatyana V. Kuklina, 2022. "Decent work in non-financial reporting of Russian companies: Assessing the disclosure quality," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 34-56, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8538-:d:1490033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.