IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8026-d1477799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehending the Consumer Behavior toward Sustainable Apparel

Author

Listed:
  • Mahendran Balasubramanian

    (Department of Design, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Pariya Sheykhmaleki

    (Department of Design, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

Abstract

This paper comprehensively reviews the extant literature on consumer behavior toward sustainable apparel as a pathway to sustainability. This literature review is based on journal articles from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Through an in-depth systematic analysis of the existing literature, this paper provides an overview of the research topic, sustainable apparel consumption, from a consumer perspective. The systematic literature review reveals five main themes: consumer attitudes, consumer purchases, consumer knowledge, consumer preferences, and consumer influence toward sustainable apparel. Different factors leading to sustainable consumer behavior emerged from each of these themes. Consumer preferences for sustainable apparel encompass various factors, such as preferred materials, styles, designs, and sizes, influenced by personal values, psychological characteristics, cultural backgrounds, socio-demographics, and the availability of options. Factors such as perceived costs, design uniqueness, and cognitive dissonance contribute to shaping consumer preferences in sustainable fashion. By delineating the complex consumer behavior and deliberating the sustainable apparel consumption phenomenon, this study aids in developing future sustainable strategies for apparel industries, considering the driving factors and their impact on consumer behavior and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahendran Balasubramanian & Pariya Sheykhmaleki, 2024. "Comprehending the Consumer Behavior toward Sustainable Apparel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8026-:d:1477799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8026/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8026/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nupur Arora & Parul Manchanda, 2022. "Green perceived value and intention to purchase sustainable apparel among Gen Z: The moderated mediation of attitudes," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 168-185, April.
    2. Lisa Zhang & Jo Hale, 2022. "Extending the Lifetime of Clothing through Repair and Repurpose: An Investigation of Barriers and Enablers in UK Citizens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Cindy Helinski & Gerhard Schewe, 2022. "The Influence of Consumer Preferences and Perceived Benefits in the Context of B2C Fashion Renting Intentions of Young Women," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Norman, Wayne & MacDonald, Chris, 2004. "Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 243-262, April.
    5. Lizhu Davis & Chitra Dabas, 2021. "Capturing sustainable fashion purchase behavior of Hispanic consumers in the US," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 245-259, July.
    6. Eung Jin Lee & Joonheui Bae & Kyung Hoon Kim, 2020. "The effect of sustainable certification reputation on consumer behavior in the fashion industry: Focusing on the mechanism of congruence," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 137-153, April.
    7. Henny Puspita & Heeju Chae, 2021. "An explorative study and comparison between companies’ and customers’ perspectives in the sustainable fashion industry," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 133-145, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    2. Saliha Karadayi-Usta & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2023. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Fashion Brands Using a Neutrosophical ORESTE Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Michael Godfrey & Andrew Manikas, 2012. "Integrating Triple Bottom Line Sustainability Concepts Into A Supplier Selection Exercise," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12.
    4. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    5. Ante Glavas & Jenny Mish, 2015. "Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 623-642, March.
    6. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Shelby D. Hunt, 2017. "Strategic marketing, sustainability, the triple bottom line, and resource-advantage (R-A) theory: Securing the foundations of strategic marketing theory and research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 52-66, June.
    8. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    9. Simon Cornée & Ariane Szafarz, 2014. "Vive la Différence: Social Banks and Reciprocity in the Credit Market," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 125(3), pages 361-380.
    10. Brennan, Linda & Binney, Wayne & McCrohan, Janelle & Lancaster, Narelle, 2011. "Implementation of environmental sustainability in business: Suggestions for improvement," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 52-57.
    11. Wenjun Guo & Eunyoung Kim, 2023. "Identifying Factors Influencing Consumers’ Choice of Disposal Channels Regarding Children’s Clothing in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Przemysław Mućko, 2016. "CSR Reporting Practices of Polish Energy and Mining Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Charles Daussy, 2013. "Can Social Responsibility Paradoxically Strengthen The Importance Of Finance?," Post-Print hal-01002375, HAL.
    14. José María Agudo & Pilar Gargallo & Manuel Salvador, 2015. "Measuring corporative social performance in firms: a Bayesian factor analysis approach," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 638-659, June.
    15. Alessio Maria Braccini & Emanuele Gabriel Margherita, 2018. "Exploring Organizational Sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the Triple Bottom Line: The Case of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Pier Giacomo Cardinali & Pietro De Giovanni, 2022. "Responsible digitalization through digital technologies and green practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 984-995, July.
    17. Mihaela Iacob & Rodica Gherghina & Georgiana Camelia Cre?an, 2019. "„Comparative (Bio)Economic Systems” in Terms of Social Responsibility: The Natural Environment – Between Ideal Capitalism, Utopian Socialism and Real-World Interventionism," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 707-707, August.
    18. Warat Winit & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2022. "Enhancing the Prospect of Corporate Sustainability via Brand Equity: A Stakeholder Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Hendrik S. Birkel & Johannes W. Veile & Julian M. Müller & Evi Hartmann & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, January.
    20. Gloria Jiménez-Marín & María del Mar Ramírez Alvarado & Cristina González-Oñate, 2022. "Application of Sensory Marketing Techniques at Marengo, a Small Sustainable Men’s Fashion Store in Spain: Based on the Hulten, Broweus and van Dijk Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8026-:d:1477799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.