IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7575-d1469078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Carbon Cap Regulation, Retailer Altruistic Preferences, and Green Decision-Making of Manufacturing Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxuan Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832061, China)

  • Guangcheng Ma

    (School of Urban and Regional Sciences, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

As manufacturing advances swiftly and public consciousness about low-carbon practices rises, eco-friendly supply chains have seen significant expansion. This study investigates a government-driven green supply chain in two phases, involving a producer and a seller. Four scenario game models are established to determine whether the manufacturer engages in green technology innovation or whether the retailer has altruistic preferences. The Stackelberg game was used to analyze changes in government carbon quota regulations, retail prices of retailers, and manufacturers’ carbon reduction efforts in the context of carbon market trading. Research shows that the government will set looser carbon emission limits for manufacturers when retailers have no altruistic preferences. When carbon prices in the market are low, encouraging manufacturers to invest in green technology innovation enhances social welfare. This study offers essential theoretical backing for the government in crafting carbon quota regulations and aids businesses in making prompt technological innovation choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxuan Sun & Guangcheng Ma, 2024. "Research on Carbon Cap Regulation, Retailer Altruistic Preferences, and Green Decision-Making of Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7575-:d:1469078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    2. Guangdong Liu & Jinggui Chen & Ziyang Li & Huagui Zhu & Liu Zhi, 2022. "Green Supply Chain Innovation Strategies, considering Government Subsidy and Altruistic Preference," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-24, February.
    3. Eghbali, Mohammad-Ali & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza & Altmann, Jörn, 2024. "An evolutionary game-theoretic approach to analysis the green innovation chain dynamics under government policies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Cai, Jianhu & Jiang, Feiying, 2023. "Decision models of pricing and carbon emission reduction for low-carbon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Fan, Ruguo & Lin, Jinchai & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2019. "Study of game models and the complex dynamics of a low-carbon supply chain with an altruistic retailer under consumers’ low-carbon preference," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 528(C).
    6. Grech, Philip D. & Nax, Heinrich H., 2020. "Rational altruism? On preference estimation and dictator game experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 309-338.
    7. Jinxuan Song & Xu Yan, 2023. "Impact of Government Subsidies, Competition, and Blockchain on Green Supply Chain Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Yuan, Ning & Li, Meijuan, 2024. "Research on collaborative innovation behavior of enterprise innovation ecosystem under evolutionary game," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Nair, Anand & Narasimhan, Ram, 2006. "Dynamics of competing with quality- and advertising-based goodwill," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 462-474, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuxin Lai & Nengmin Wang & Bin Jiang & Tao Jia, 2024. "Choosing Recovery Strategies for Waste Electronics: How Product Modularity Influences Cooperation and Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-31, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Zhou & Xiancong Wu, 2023. "Decisions for a Retailer-Led Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Altruistic Preference under Carbon Quota Policy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Jin, Mingzhou & Mao, Jiafu, 2021. "Decisions and coordination of retailer-led low-carbon supply chain under altruistic preference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 910-925.
    3. Linwei Pan & Xueyu Liao & Rui Li & Shuangping Cao, 2023. "The Industrial Decision Analysis of Regional Coordinated Development Considering Information Distribution and Fairness Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Guangxing Wei & Linrong Zhou & Binta Bary, 2022. "Operational Decision and Sustainability of Green Agricultural Supply Chain with Consumer-Oriented Altruism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Wang, Yuyan & Wang, Dexia & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhou, Rui & Gao, Junhong, 2023. "Decision and coordination of E-commerce closed-loop supply chains with fairness concern," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Jianfeng Liu & Liguo Zhou & Yuyan Wang, 2021. "Altruistic Preference Models of Low-Carbon E-Commerce Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Luciano Andreozzi & Marco Faillo & Ali Seyhun Saral, 2021. "Reciprocity in Dictator Games: An Experimental Study," CEEL Working Papers 2101, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    8. Ederer, Florian & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2017. "Promises and expectations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 161-178.
    9. Agnes Bäker & Werner Güth & Kerstin Pull & Manfred Stadler, 2012. "On the Context-Dependency of Inequality Aversion - Experimental Evidence and a Stylized Model -," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-023, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Claudia M. Landeo & Kathryn E. Spier, 2016. "Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 172(2), pages 235-273, June.
    11. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    12. Maria Gabriella Graziano & Vincenzo Platino, 2024. "A measure of social loss for production economies with externalities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(2), pages 443-474, September.
    13. Guang Yang & Mulin Liu & Mei Cai & Qihua Yin, 2024. "An analytical game perspective model for pay-what-you-want pricing schemes considering consumer fairness," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 345-365, December.
    14. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    15. Robert Jiro Netzer & Matthias Sutter, 2009. "Intercultural trust. An experiment in Austria and Japan," Working Papers 2009-05, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    16. David J. Cooper & Krista Saral & Marie Claire Villeval, 2021. "Why Join a Team?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6980-6997, November.
    17. Ellingsen, Tore & Johannesson, Magnus, 2009. "Time is not money," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 96-102, October.
    18. Becchetti, Leonardo & Degli Antoni, Giacomo & Ottone, Stefania & Solferino, Nazaria, 2013. "Allocation criteria under task performance: The gendered preference for protection," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 96-111.
    19. Mujcic, Redzo & Frijters, Paul, 2013. "Still Not Allowed on the Bus: It Matters If You're Black or White!," IZA Discussion Papers 7300, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Renou, Ludovic & Schlag, Karl H., 2010. "Minimax regret and strategic uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 264-286, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7575-:d:1469078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.