IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6437-d1444326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replacing Gray Hydrogen with Renewable Hydrogen at the Consumption Location Using the Example of the Existing Fertilizer Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Dumančić

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Nela Vlahinić

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Minea Skok

    (Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

The production and use of hydrogen are encouraged by the European Union through Delegated Acts, especially in sectors that are difficult to decarbonize, such as the industrial and transport sectors. This study analyzes the possibility of partial decarbonization of the existing plant in the petrochemical industry, with a partial transition from natural gas to renewable hydrogen, as a precursor to the adoption of the hydrogen economy by 2050. This study was based on the example of a plant from the petrochemical industry, namely an existing fertilizer plant. Namely, in the petrochemical industry, hydrogen is produced by steam-reforming natural gas, which is needed in the process of producing ammonia, one of the basic raw materials for mineral fertilizers. By building an electrolyzer at the location of the existing fertilizer plant, it is possible to obtain renewable hydrogen, which enters the ammonia production process as a raw material. The electricity from which hydrogen is produced in the electrolyzer is provided through Power Purchase Agreement contracts concluded with electricity producers from 12 wind power plants. The results of this study show that the production of renewable hydrogen at the location of the analyzed plant is not profitable, but due to the specificity of the process of such an industry, the high consumption of natural gas, and large savings in CO 2 emissions which can be achieved by the production of renewable hydrogen, investment is needed. With a 370 MW electrolyzer, about 31,000 tons of renewable hydrogen is produced, which represents about 50% of the hydrogen needs of the analyzed plant. By producing renewable hydrogen for part of the needs of the analyzed plant, a saving of about 300,000 tons of CO 2 emissions is achieved in relation to the production of gray hydrogen, which contributes to the partial decarbonization of the analyzed plant. The authors are aware that the current market opportunities do not allow the profitability of the investment without subsidies, but with the advancement of technology and a different price ratio of electricity, natural gas, and CO 2 emissions, they believe that such investments will be profitable even without subsidies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić & Minea Skok, 2024. "Replacing Gray Hydrogen with Renewable Hydrogen at the Consumption Location Using the Example of the Existing Fertilizer Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-33, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6437-:d:1444326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kountouris, Ioannis & Langer, Lissy & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Münster, Marie & Keles, Dogan, 2023. "Power-to-X in energy hubs: A Danish case study of renewable fuel production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Ioannou, Anastasia & Fuzuli, Gulistiani & Brennan, Feargal & Yudha, Satya Widya & Angus, Andrew, 2019. "Multi-stage stochastic optimization framework for power generation system planning integrating hybrid uncertainty modelling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 760-776.
    3. Ma, Qian & Chang, Yuan & Yuan, Bo & Song, Zhaozheng & Xue, Jinjun & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Utilizing carbon dioxide from refinery flue gas for methanol production: System design and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Mikovits, Christian & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wehrle, Sebastian & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2021. "Stronger together: Multi-annual variability of hydrogen production supported by wind power in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    5. Moradpoor, Iraj & Syri, Sanna & Santasalo-Aarnio, Annukka, 2023. "Green hydrogen production for oil refining – Finnish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Perpiñán, Jorge & Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Romeo, Luis M. & Eveloy, Valerie, 2023. "Technical and economic assessment of iron and steelmaking decarbonization via power to gas and amine scrubbing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Bareiß, Kay & de la Rua, Cristina & Möckl, Maximilian & Hamacher, Thomas, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 862-872.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić Lenz & Lahorko Wagmann, 2024. "Profitability Model of Green Hydrogen Production on an Existing Wind Power Plant Location," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Sayed-Ahmed, H. & Toldy, Á.I. & Santasalo-Aarnio, A., 2024. "Dynamic operation of proton exchange membrane electrolyzers—Critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    3. Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić Lenz & Goran Majstrović, 2023. "Can Hydrogen Production Be Economically Viable on the Existing Gas-Fired Power Plant Location? New Empirical Evidence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Sander Claeys & Marta Vanin & Frederik Geth & Geert Deconinck, 2021. "Applications of optimization models for electricity distribution networks," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), September.
    5. M. Jenabi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & S. A. Torabi & Moeen Sammak Jalali, 2022. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic power system expansion planning using sample average approximation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    6. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Jones, Dylan & Hofman, Peter S. & Zhang, Lina, 2023. "Integrated strategic energy mix and energy generation planning with multiple sustainability criteria and hierarchical stakeholders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 864-883.
    7. Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Hache, Emmanuel & D'Herbemont, Vincent & Guyot, Mathis & Malbec, Louis-Marie, 2023. "Hydrogen development in Europe: Estimating material consumption in net zero emissions scenarios," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Negar Shaya & Simon Glöser-Chahoud, 2024. "A Review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Studies for Hydrogen Production Technologies through Water Electrolysis: Recent Advances," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Yadav, Deepak & Banerjee, Rangan, 2020. "Net energy and carbon footprint analysis of solar hydrogen production from the high-temperature electrolysis process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    10. Ali Dargahi & Khezr Sanjani & Morteza Nazari-Heris & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Sajjad Tohidi & Mousa Marzband, 2020. "Scheduling of Air Conditioning and Thermal Energy Storage Systems Considering Demand Response Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Wang, Bangyan & Wang, Xiuli & Wei, Fengting & Shao, Chengcheng & Zhou, Jiahao & Lin, Jintian, 2023. "Multi-stage stochastic planning for a long-term low-carbon transition of island power system considering carbon price uncertainty and offshore wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Desantes, J.M. & Novella, R. & Pla, B. & Lopez-Juarez, M., 2021. "Impact of fuel cell range extender powertrain design on greenhouse gases and NOX emissions in automotive applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    13. Leonhard Povacz & Ramchandra Bhandari, 2023. "Analysis of the Levelized Cost of Renewable Hydrogen in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Jhang, Syu-Ruei & Lin, Yuan-Chung & Chen, Kang-Shin & Lin, Sheng-Lun & Batterman, Stuart, 2020. "Evaluation of fuel consumption, pollutant emissions and well-to-wheel GHGs assessment from a vehicle operation fueled with bioethanol, gasoline and hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. Ehrenstein, Michael & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Tulus, Victor & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Optimising fuel supply chains within planetary boundaries: A case study of hydrogen for road transport in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    16. Mohamed Mohamed Khaleel & Mohd Rafi Adzman & Samila Mat Zali, 2021. "An Integrated of Hydrogen Fuel Cell to Distribution Network System: Challenging and Opportunity for D-STATCOM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Kang, Jidong & Wu, Zhuochun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1234-1248.
    18. Alviani, Vani Novita & Hirano, Nobuo & Watanabe, Noriaki & Oba, Masahiro & Uno, Masaoki & Tsuchiya, Noriyoshi, 2021. "Local initiative hydrogen production by utilization of aluminum waste materials and natural acidic hot-spring water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    19. Bartosz Ceran, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Comparative Analysis of Clean Hydrogen Production Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Bidart, Christian & Wichert, Martin & Kolb, Gunther & Held, Michael, 2022. "Biogas catalytic methanation for biomethane production as fuel in freight transport - A carbon footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6437-:d:1444326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.