IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7596-d1140138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Individualism, Collectivism, Materialism, and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection on Environmental Consciousness and Pro-Environmental Consumption Behavior in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • So Yeon Cho

    (Department of Home Economic Education, Dongguk University, 30 Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

  • Joowon Jung

    (Department of Home Economic Education, Dongguk University, 30 Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Environmental consciousness is linked to pro-environmental consumption behavior; however, the consequences of variations in the level of environmental consciousness have not been fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated differences in individualism, collectivism, materialism, willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental protection, and pro-environmental consumption between groups with varying levels of environmental consciousness. After evaluating the factors that differentiate these groups, we identified the determinants of pro-environmental consumption for each group. For the study, an online survey was conducted, including 472 adults aged 20–69 years. Groups with low and high levels of environmental consciousness differed significantly with respect to all factors except individualism. The group with a high environmental consciousness exhibited higher collectivism, WTP for environmental protection, and pro-environmental consumption behavior, and lower materialism than the group with a low environmental consciousness. For the group with low environmental consciousness, collectivism was the main factor affecting pro-environmental consumption behavior (i.e., purchase, use, and disposal). In the group with high environmental consciousness, WTP for environmental protection and collectivism were the main determinants of pro-environmental consumption behavior. These results provide a basis for a systematic approach to improve pro-environmental consumption behavior based on environmental consciousness.

Suggested Citation

  • So Yeon Cho & Joowon Jung, 2023. "Effects of Individualism, Collectivism, Materialism, and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection on Environmental Consciousness and Pro-Environmental Consumption Behavior in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7596-:d:1140138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lori M. Hunter & Alison Hatch & Aaron Johnson, 2004. "Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(3), pages 677-694, September.
    2. McCarty, John A. & Shrum, L. J., 1994. "The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 53-62, May.
    3. Belk, Russell W, 1985. "Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 265-280, December.
    4. Irene Tilikidou, 2007. "The effects of knowledge and attitudes upon Greeks' pro‐environmental purchasing behaviour," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 121-134, July.
    5. Mirella Soyer & Koen Dittrich, 2021. "Sustainable Consumer Behavior in Purchasing, Using and Disposing of Clothes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Szu‐Tung Lin & Han‐Jen Niu, 2018. "Green consumption: Environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1679-1688, December.
    7. Zimmer, Mary R. & Stafford, Thomas F. & Stafford, Marla Royne, 1994. "Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 63-74, May.
    8. Gleim, Mark R. & Smith, Jeffery S. & Andrews, Demetra & Cronin, J. Joseph, 2013. "Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 44-61.
    9. Daniel Roos & Rüdiger Hahn, 2019. "Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 679-697, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhardwaj, Seema & Sreen, Naman & Das, Manish & Chitnis, Asmita & Kumar, Sushant, 2023. "Product specific values and personal values together better explains green purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Cindy Helinski & Gerhard Schewe, 2022. "The Influence of Consumer Preferences and Perceived Benefits in the Context of B2C Fashion Renting Intentions of Young Women," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Yanyan Zhang & Tat-Huei Cham & Chuen Khee Pek & Choi-Meng Leong, 2024. "Is face and information availability important in green purchasing among young consumers?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Sreen, Naman & Purbey, Shankar & Sadarangani, Pradip, 2018. "Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 177-189.
    5. Yueling Xu & Wenyu Zhang & Haijun Bao & Shuai Zhang & Ying Xiang, 2019. "A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Ying Lin & Chia-Sui Weng, 2015. "The Influence of Environmental Friendliness on Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Satisfaction and Green Perceived Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Olawole Fawehinmi & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Samuel Ogbeibu & M. Imran Tanveer & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2022. "Academic employees' green behaviour as praxis for bolstering environmental sustainable development: A linear moderated mediation evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3470-3490, November.
    8. Zivar Zeynalova & Natavan Namazova, 2022. "Revealing Consumer Behavior toward Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Sang‐June Park & Sungchul Choi & Eun‐Jeong Kim, 2012. "The Relationships between Socio‐demographic Variables and Concerns about Environmental Sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 343-354, November.
    10. Kilbourne, William E. & Beckmann, Suzanne C. & Thelen, Eva, 2002. "The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: a multinational examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 193-204, March.
    11. Duarte Xara-Brasil & João Pedro Cordeiro & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Pedro Pardal & Paulo Duarte Silveira, 2023. "Consumer, Retailer, and Producer Green Orientation as a Marketing Driver: An Empirical Study in an Urban Food Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Dave Webb & Janine Wong, 2014. "Exploring Antecedents of Charitable Giving and Their Impact on Subjective Well-Being in Singapore," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 65-87, May.
    13. Tracie (Tsun-Yin) Tung & Harold F. Koenig & Hsiou-Lien Chen, 2017. "Effects of Green Self-Identity and Cognitive and Affective Involvement on Patronage Intention in Eco-Friendly Apparel Consumption: A Gender Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Bohlen, Greg M., 2003. "Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 465-480, June.
    15. Lawson, Stephanie J. & Gleim, Mark R. & Perren, Rebeca & Hwang, Jiyoung, 2016. "Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2615-2623.
    16. Petra Lindemann-Matthies & Julia Werdermann & Martin Remmele, 2023. "‘Simply Make a Change’—Individual Commitment as a Stepping Stone for Sustainable Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Sandra, Notaro & Alessandro, Paletto, 2021. "Consumers’ preferences, attitudes and willingness to pay for bio-textile in wood fibers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    18. Gonzalo DíaznMeneses & Asunción Beerli Palacio, 2004. "La jerarquía de efectos clísica de alta involucraciín para la comprensión de la conducta de reciclaje considerando los valores de los consumidores," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 1(1), pages 89-109, June.
    19. Petra Lindemann-Matthies & Ellinor Hoyer & Martin Remmele, 2021. "Collective Public Commitment: Young People on the Path to a More Sustainable Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Ramayah, T. & Lee, Jason Wai Chow & Mohamad, Osman, 2010. "Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1419-1427.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7596-:d:1140138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.