IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6282-d1117111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Car-Following Behavior with Different Acceptable Safety Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Maosheng Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Smart Transportation Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Central South University, 22 South Shaoshan Road, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Jing Fan

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Jaeyoung Lee

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Smart Transportation Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Central South University, 22 South Shaoshan Road, Changsha 410075, China
    Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

Abstract

In normal car-following (CF) states, the minimum safe braking distance (MSBD) is virtually an unmeasurable variable, mainly due to the diversity of drivers’ reaction times and vehicles’ braking performance. The average MSBD regarding the reaction time and decelerations as constant values is sometimes greater than the distance used for safe braking of the following vehicle when the leading vehicle applies an emergency brake, which is named the short-distance CF behavior. The short-distance CF conveys that drivers adopt strategies of lower acceptable safety levels, which can be applied to intelligent connected technology (ICT). The objective of this paper was to extend the CF model to accommodate manual driving behavior on the state of different safety levels, and to analyze road traffic flow in the environment from manual driving to high-level intelligent driving with different delays. First, the cognitive bias variable was defined as the ratio of the actual braking distance available to the average MSBD to indirectly analyze different safety levels. Second, the Gipps model was extended, depending on the cognitive bias variable threshold and the duration length of the short-distance CF state, to reproduce driving behaviors with different acceptable safety levels more accurately by numerical simulation. Finally, using models to numerically simulate the impact of vehicles on road traffic flow was carried out. CF behaviors with lower acceptable safety levels under manual driving conditions increase traffic efficiency, and road capacity and safety are significantly improved due to ICT enabling a shortened reaction time. The short-distance driving applied to ICT is expected to be a strategy for traffic congestion mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maosheng Li & Jing Fan & Jaeyoung Lee, 2023. "Modeling Car-Following Behavior with Different Acceptable Safety Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6282-:d:1117111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    2. Jin, Sheng & Wang, Dian-Hai & Huang, Zhi-Yi & Tao, Peng-Fei, 2011. "Visual angle model for car-following theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(11), pages 1931-1940.
    3. Jiao, Shuaiyang & Zhang, Shengrui & Zhou, Bei & Zhang, Lei & Xue, Liyuan, 2021. "Dynamic performance and safety analysis of car-following models considering collision sensitivity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 564(C).
    4. Montanino, Marcello & Punzo, Vincenzo, 2015. "Trajectory data reconstruction and simulation-based validation against macroscopic traffic patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-106.
    5. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman & Richard W. Rothery, 1961. "Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 545-567, August.
    6. Hamdar, Samer H. & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Treiber, Martin, 2015. "From behavioral psychology to acceleration modeling: Calibration, validation, and exploration of drivers’ cognitive and safety parameters in a risk-taking environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 32-53.
    7. Saifuzzaman, Mohammad & Zheng, Zuduo & Mazharul Haque, Md. & Washington, Simon, 2015. "Revisiting the Task–Capability Interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-19.
    8. Tian, Junfang & Treiber, Martin & Ma, Shoufeng & Jia, Bin & Zhang, Wenyi, 2015. "Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 138-157.
    9. G. F. Newell, 1961. "Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 209-229, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Zhang & Dayi Qu & Xiaojing Zhang & Shouchen Dai & Qikun Wang, 2024. "Vehicle Driving Behavior Analysis and Unified Modeling in Urban Road Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Lint, J.W.C. & Calvert, S.C., 2018. "A generic multi-level framework for microscopic traffic simulation—Theory and an example case in modelling driver distraction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 63-86.
    2. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    3. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    4. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    5. Dayi Qu & Shaojie Wang & Haomin Liu & Yiming Meng, 2022. "A Car-Following Model Based on Trajectory Data for Connected and Automated Vehicles to Predict Trajectory of Human-Driven Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Jinhua Tan & Li Gong & Xuqian Qin, 2019. "Global Optimality under Internet of Vehicles: Strategy to Improve Traffic Safety and Reduce Energy Dissipation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    8. Calvert, Simeon C. & Schakel, Wouter J. & van Lint, J.W.C., 2020. "A generic multi-scale framework for microscopic traffic simulation part II – Anticipation Reliance as compensation mechanism for potential task overload," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 42-63.
    9. Kun Zhang & Yu Xue & Hao-Jie Luo & Qiang Zhang & Yuan Tang & Bing-Ling Cen, 2023. "Cyber-attacks on the optimal velocity and its variation by bifurcation analyses," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Xin Chang & Xingjian Zhang & Haichao Li & Chang Wang & Zhe Liu, 2022. "A Survey on Mixed Traffic Flow Characteristics in Connected Vehicle Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Ponnu, Balaji & Coifman, Benjamin, 2015. "Speed-spacing dependency on relative speed from the adjacent lane: New insights for car following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-90.
    12. Sharma, Anshuman & Zheng, Zuduo & Bhaskar, Ashish & Haque, Md. Mazharul, 2019. "Modelling car-following behaviour of connected vehicles with a focus on driver compliance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 256-279.
    13. Tian, Junfang & Zhu, Chenqiang & Chen, Danjue & Jiang, Rui & Wang, Guanying & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "Car following behavioral stochasticity analysis and modeling: Perspective from wave travel time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 160-176.
    14. Li, Xiaopeng & Cui, Jianxun & An, Shi & Parsafard, Mohsen, 2014. "Stop-and-go traffic analysis: Theoretical properties, environmental impacts and oscillation mitigation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 319-339.
    15. Faryal Ali & Zawar Hussain Khan & Khurram Shehzad Khattak & Thomas Aaron Gulliver & Akhtar Nawaz Khan, 2022. "A Microscopic Heterogeneous Traffic Flow Model Considering Distance Headway," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Zhang, Xiangzhou & Shi, Zhongke & Yu, Shaowei & Ma, Lijing, 2023. "A new car-following model considering driver’s desired visual angle on sharp curves," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 615(C).
    17. Jia, Yanfeng & Qu, Dayi & Song, Hui & Wang, Tao & Zhao, Zixu, 2022. "Car-following characteristics and model of connected autonomous vehicles based on safe potential field," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    18. Faryal Ali & Zawar Hussain Khan & Khurram Shehzad Khattak & Thomas Aaron Gulliver & Ahmed B. Altamimi, 2023. "A Microscopic Traffic Model Incorporating Vehicle Vibrations Due to Pavement Condition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Zhang, Xiangzhou & Shi, Zhongke & Chen, Jianzhong & Ma, lijing, 2023. "A bi-directional visual angle car-following model considering collision sensitivity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    20. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Characterization of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1346-1361.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6282-:d:1117111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.