IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7045-d834572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Car-Following Model Based on Trajectory Data for Connected and Automated Vehicles to Predict Trajectory of Human-Driven Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Dayi Qu

    (School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Shaojie Wang

    (School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Haomin Liu

    (School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Yiming Meng

    (School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

Abstract

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) have been rapidly developed, which, inevitably, renders that human-driven and autonomous vehicles share the road. Thus, trajectory prediction is an important research topic, which helps each CAV to efficiently follow a Human-Driven Vehicle (HV). In a wider scope, trajectory prediction, also, helps to improve the throughput of traffic flow and enhance its stability. To realize the trajectory prediction of Connected and Automated Vehicles to Human-Driven Vehicles, a car-following model, which is based on trajectory data, was established. Adding deep neural networks and an Attention mechanism, this paper established a data-driven car-following model, based on CNN-BiLSTM-Attention for CAV, to predict trajectory, by referring to the modeling idea of the traditional car-following model. The trajectory data in the next-generation-simulation (NGSIM) datasets that match the car-following characteristics were selected. In addition, noise-reduction pre-processing of the trajectory data was performed, to make it match the actual car-following situation. Experiments, for selecting the optimal structure of the model and the method of trajectory prediction, were carried out. The data-driven car-following models, such as LSTM, GRU, and CNN-BiLSTM, were selected for comparative analysis of trajectory prediction. The results show that the CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model has the smallest MAE and MSE as well as the largest R 2 . The CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model has the highest accuracy in vehicle-trajectory prediction. The model can, effectively, realize vehicle-trajectory prediction and provide a theoretical basis for vehicle-trajectory-based velocity guidance of Human-Driven Vehicles. In the future, the model can, also, provide the theoretical basis for Connected and Automated Vehicles, to make car-following decisions in mixed traffic flow.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayi Qu & Shaojie Wang & Haomin Liu & Yiming Meng, 2022. "A Car-Following Model Based on Trajectory Data for Connected and Automated Vehicles to Predict Trajectory of Human-Driven Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7045-:d:834572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    2. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman & Renfrey B. Potts, 1959. "Car-Following Theory of Steady-State Traffic Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 499-505, August.
    3. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman & Richard W. Rothery, 1961. "Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 545-567, August.
    4. Wei, Dali & Liu, Hongchao, 2013. "Analysis of asymmetric driving behavior using a self-learning approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-14.
    5. G. F. Newell, 1961. "Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 209-229, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziyu Chen & Xiufeng Chen & Ruicong Wang & Mengyuan Gao, 2022. "Characterization of Pedestrian Crossing Spatial Violations and Safety Impact Analysis in Advance Right-Turn Lane," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Cao, Jianing & Han, Yuhang & Pan, Nan & Zhang, Jingcheng & Yang, Junwei, 2024. "A data-driven approach to urban charging facility expansion based on bi-level optimization: A case study in a Chinese city," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    2. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    3. Wang, Xiao & Jiang, Rui & Li, Li & Lin, Yi-Lun & Wang, Fei-Yue, 2019. "Long memory is important: A test study on deep-learning based car-following model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 786-795.
    4. Zhang, H.M. & Kim, T., 2005. "A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 385-399, June.
    5. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    6. Jinhua Tan & Li Gong & Xuqian Qin, 2019. "Global Optimality under Internet of Vehicles: Strategy to Improve Traffic Safety and Reduce Energy Dissipation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Toan, Trinh Dinh & Lam, Soi Hoi & Wong, Yiik Diew & Meng, Meng, 2022. "Development and validation of a driving simulator for traffic control using field data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    8. Kun Zhang & Yu Xue & Hao-Jie Luo & Qiang Zhang & Yuan Tang & Bing-Ling Cen, 2023. "Cyber-attacks on the optimal velocity and its variation by bifurcation analyses," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Xin Chang & Xingjian Zhang & Haichao Li & Chang Wang & Zhe Liu, 2022. "A Survey on Mixed Traffic Flow Characteristics in Connected Vehicle Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Ponnu, Balaji & Coifman, Benjamin, 2015. "Speed-spacing dependency on relative speed from the adjacent lane: New insights for car following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-90.
    11. Li, Xiaopeng & Cui, Jianxun & An, Shi & Parsafard, Mohsen, 2014. "Stop-and-go traffic analysis: Theoretical properties, environmental impacts and oscillation mitigation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 319-339.
    12. Michael Z. F. Li, 2008. "A Generic Characterization of Equilibrium Speed-Flow Curves," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 220-235, May.
    13. Cheng, Qixiu & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lin, Yuqian & Zhou, Xuesong (Simon), 2021. "An s-shaped three-parameter (S3) traffic stream model with consistent car following relationship," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 246-271.
    14. Faryal Ali & Zawar Hussain Khan & Khurram Shehzad Khattak & Thomas Aaron Gulliver & Akhtar Nawaz Khan, 2022. "A Microscopic Heterogeneous Traffic Flow Model Considering Distance Headway," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Maosheng Li & Jing Fan & Jaeyoung Lee, 2023. "Modeling Car-Following Behavior with Different Acceptable Safety Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Jia, Yanfeng & Qu, Dayi & Song, Hui & Wang, Tao & Zhao, Zixu, 2022. "Car-following characteristics and model of connected autonomous vehicles based on safe potential field," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    17. Faryal Ali & Zawar Hussain Khan & Khurram Shehzad Khattak & Thomas Aaron Gulliver & Ahmed B. Altamimi, 2023. "A Microscopic Traffic Model Incorporating Vehicle Vibrations Due to Pavement Condition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Characterization of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1346-1361.
    19. Kalathil, Dileep & Kurzhanskiy, Alex A. & Varaiya, Pravin, 2017. "Sustainable Operation of Arterial Networks," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5js550jt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    20. Wang, Jinghui & Lv, Wei & Jiang, Yajuan & Qin, Shuangshuang & Li, Jiawei, 2021. "A multi-agent based cellular automata model for intersection traffic control simulation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7045-:d:834572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.