IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v140y2020icp42-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generic multi-scale framework for microscopic traffic simulation part II – Anticipation Reliance as compensation mechanism for potential task overload

Author

Listed:
  • Calvert, Simeon C.
  • Schakel, Wouter J.
  • van Lint, J.W.C.

Abstract

The inclusion of human factors (HF) in mathematical models is proving crucial to allow complex driving behaviour and interactions to be explicitly considered to capture driving phenomena. An important area where such integration is required is for the role of anticipation by drivers to compensate for critical traffic situations. In this paper, we introduce the concept of Anticipation Reliance (AR), which acts as a demand lowering compensative effect for the driving task by relying more on anticipation. We implement AR in a generic multi-scale microscopic traffic modelling and simulation framework to explore and explain the effects of HF on traffic operations and safety in critical traffic situations. This concept addresses a disparity in the description of driver workload in relation to the execution of driving tasks in regard to the confidence that drivers place on tasks that are sub-consciously catered for. The crossover from HF to a mathematical description of this role of AR introduces a ground-breaking concept that explains and models the mechanisms that allow drivers to compensate and avoid accidents in many circumstances, even when driving errors or sub-optimal driving performance occurs. By and large, the HF effects can be subdivided in effects on perception and anticipation; effects on sensitivity and response to stimuli; and effects on personal attributes and characteristics. A key aspect of the framework are two intertwined driver-specific mental state variables—total workload and awareness—that bridge between classic collision-free idealized models for lane changing and car following, and HF models that explain under which conditions the performance of drivers deteriorates in terms of reaction time, sensitivity to stimuli or other parameters. In this paper, we focus on the awareness construct, as described by AR, and explore the effects. We prove the effectiveness of the approach with a case example that demonstrates the ability of the model to dissect a complex traffic situation with both longitudinal and lateral driving tasks, while endogenously considering human factors and that produces accident avoidance and occurrence within the same order of magnitude compared to real traffic accident statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvert, Simeon C. & Schakel, Wouter J. & van Lint, J.W.C., 2020. "A generic multi-scale framework for microscopic traffic simulation part II – Anticipation Reliance as compensation mechanism for potential task overload," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 42-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:140:y:2020:i:c:p:42-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.07.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261520303714
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2020.07.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman & Richard W. Rothery, 1961. "Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 545-567, August.
    2. Davis, L.C., 2003. "Modifications of the optimal velocity traffic model to include delay due to driver reaction time," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 557-567.
    3. Hamdar, Samer H. & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Treiber, Martin, 2015. "From behavioral psychology to acceleration modeling: Calibration, validation, and exploration of drivers’ cognitive and safety parameters in a risk-taking environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 32-53.
    4. Saifuzzaman, Mohammad & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Washington, Simon, 2017. "Understanding the mechanism of traffic hysteresis and traffic oscillations through the change in task difficulty level," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 523-538.
    5. Treiber, Martin & Kesting, Arne & Helbing, Dirk, 2006. "Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 360(1), pages 71-88.
    6. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Zhang, Jian & Liu, Kai, 2017. "A speed guidance model accounting for the driver’s bounded rationality at a signalized intersection," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 45-52.
    7. Sharma, Anshuman & Zheng, Zuduo & Bhaskar, Ashish & Haque, Md. Mazharul, 2019. "Modelling car-following behaviour of connected vehicles with a focus on driver compliance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 256-279.
    8. Saifuzzaman, Mohammad & Zheng, Zuduo & Mazharul Haque, Md. & Washington, Simon, 2015. "Revisiting the Task–Capability Interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-19.
    9. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    10. Laval, Jorge A. & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2008. "Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 511-522, July.
    11. Chen, Danjue & Ahn, Soyoung & Laval, Jorge & Zheng, Zuduo, 2014. "On the periodicity of traffic oscillations and capacity drop: The role of driver characteristics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 117-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Lint, J.W.C. & Calvert, S.C., 2018. "A generic multi-level framework for microscopic traffic simulation—Theory and an example case in modelling driver distraction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 63-86.
    2. Mohammadian, Saeed & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Mazharul & Bhaskar, Ashish, 2023. "NET-RAT: Non-equilibrium traffic model based on risk allostasis theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Yifan Pan & Yongjiang Wang & Baobin Miao & Rongjun Cheng, 2022. "Stabilization Strategy of a Novel Car-Following Model with Time Delay and Memory Effect of the Driver," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Chen, Danjue & Ahn, Soyoung, 2018. "Capacity-drop at extended bottlenecks: Merge, diverge, and weave," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-20.
    5. Xin Chang & Xingjian Zhang & Haichao Li & Chang Wang & Zhe Liu, 2022. "A Survey on Mixed Traffic Flow Characteristics in Connected Vehicle Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Sharma, Anshuman & Zheng, Zuduo & Bhaskar, Ashish & Haque, Md. Mazharul, 2019. "Modelling car-following behaviour of connected vehicles with a focus on driver compliance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 256-279.
    7. Maosheng Li & Jing Fan & Jaeyoung Lee, 2023. "Modeling Car-Following Behavior with Different Acceptable Safety Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Ronan Keane & H. Oliver Gao, 2021. "Fast Calibration of Car-Following Models to Trajectory Data Using the Adjoint Method," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 592-615, May.
    9. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Characterization of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1346-1361.
    10. Jia, Dongyao & Ngoduy, Dong, 2016. "Enhanced cooperative car-following traffic model with the combination of V2V and V2I communication," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 172-191.
    11. Sun, Lu & Jafaripournimchahi, Ammar & Kornhauser, Alain & Hu, Wushen, 2020. "A new higher-order viscous continuum traffic flow model considering driver memory in the era of autonomous and connected vehicles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    12. McCrea, Jennifer & Moutari, Salissou, 2010. "A hybrid macroscopic-based model for traffic flow in road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 676-684, December.
    13. Laval, Jorge A. & Toth, Christopher S. & Zhou, Yi, 2014. "A parsimonious model for the formation of oscillations in car-following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 228-238.
    14. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    15. Wang, Xiao & Jiang, Rui & Li, Li & Lin, Yi-Lun & Wang, Fei-Yue, 2019. "Long memory is important: A test study on deep-learning based car-following model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 786-795.
    16. Coifman, Benjamin & Ponnu, Balaji, 2020. "Adjacent lane dependencies modulating wave velocity on congested freeways-An empirical study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 84-99.
    17. Treiber, Martin & Kesting, Arne & Helbing, Dirk, 2010. "Three-phase traffic theory and two-phase models with a fundamental diagram in the light of empirical stylized facts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 983-1000, September.
    18. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    19. Treiber, Martin & Kesting, Arne, 2018. "The Intelligent Driver Model with stochasticity – New insights into traffic flow oscillations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 613-623.
    20. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:140:y:2020:i:c:p:42-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.