IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5380-d1100656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Awareness Level of Spatial Planning Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction in Informal Settlements in Mopani District, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Juliet Akola

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)

  • James Chakwizira

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Geo and Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Agriculture, Northwest University, Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa)

  • Emaculate Ingwani

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)

  • Peter Bikam

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)

Abstract

Disaster risks are becoming more prevalent in densely populated spaces such as informal settlements as a result of unplanned urbanisation. Several scholars ascribe this condition to inadequate awareness of spatial planning tools among informal settlers, as these influence where and how they construct their buildings for disaster risk reduction. This study aimed at assessing the awareness level of spatial planning tools for disaster risk reduction in informal settlements in Mopani District, South Africa. A questionnaire was used to collect primary data from 608 households that were selected using stratified sampling. The Relative Importance Index which was transformed into five importance levels was used to assess the awareness level of spatial planning tools for disaster risk reduction. The study analysed the relationship between participant characteristics and awareness level using a t -test and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The transformed relative importance index revealed that there is a moderate to low level of awareness of spatial planning tools for disaster risk reduction. A t -test and an ANOVA revealed significant differences in awareness levels of spatial planning tools between the sub-groups based on gender, education and income levels. The females, low-income earners and less educated have a lower awareness level of spatial planning tools for disaster risk reduction. The study recommends focusing on raising awareness of spatial planning tools for disaster risk reduction among the females, low-income earners and less educated to promote safe, healthy and liveable spaces in informal settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliet Akola & James Chakwizira & Emaculate Ingwani & Peter Bikam, 2023. "Awareness Level of Spatial Planning Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction in Informal Settlements in Mopani District, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5380-:d:1100656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burcu Turan Çimşir & Hüseyin Uzunboylu, 2019. "Awareness Training for Sustainable Development: Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Mobile Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Basem Al Khatib & Yap Soon Poh & Ahmed El-Shafie, 2020. "Delay Factors Management and Ranking for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Projects Based on the Relative Importance Index (RII)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Ofélia Anjos & Nada M. Boustani & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Marijana Matek Sarić & Manuela Ferreira & Cristina A. Costa & Elena Bartkiene & Ana P. Cardoso & M, 2022. "Are Consumers Aware of Sustainability Aspects Related to Edible Insects? Results from a Study Involving 14 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. David Cerulli & Michael Scott & Raivo Aunap & Ain Kull & Jaan Pärn & Jack Holbrook & Ülo Mander, 2020. "The Role of Education in Increasing Awareness and Reducing Impact of Natural Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Joanna M. McMillan & Joern Birkmann & Siwaporn Tangwanichagapong & Ali Jamshed, 2022. "Spatial Planning and Systems Thinking Tools for Climate Risk Reduction: A Case Study of the Andaman Coast, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Cillian P. McDowell & Luisa Andrade & Eoin O’Neill & Kevin O’Malley & Jean O’Dwyer & Paul D. Hynds, 2020. "Gender-Related Differences in Flood Risk Perception and Behaviours among Private Groundwater Users in the Republic of Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Filippos Eliades & Maria K. Doula & Iliana Papamichael & Ioannis Vardopoulos & Irene Voukkali & Antonis A. Zorpas, 2022. "Carving out a Niche in the Sustainability Confluence for Environmental Education Centers in Cyprus and Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. John Mamokhere & Daniel Francois Meyer, 2022. "A Review of Mechanisms Used to Improve Community Participation in the Integrated Development Planning Process in South Africa: An Empirical Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moahd Alghuson, 2023. "Exploring the Transport Infrastructure Sustainability Performance: An Investigation of the Transportation Projects in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Lorenz Probst, 2022. "Higher Education for Sustainability: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence 2013–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Carmen Isensee & Frank Teuteberg & Kai Michael Griese, 2022. "Exploring the Use of Mobile Apps for Fostering Sustainability-Oriented Corporate Culture: A Qualitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Shingirai Mugambiwa & Jabulani Makhubele, 2021. "Anthropogenic flash floods and climate change in rural Zimbabwe: Impacts and options for adaptation," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 21(1), pages 809-819, July.
    5. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi, 2023. "Perspectives and Challenges on Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications in Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-6, February.
    6. Junlong Peng & Mengyao Wang & Chao Peng & Ke Hu, 2022. "Research on extremely short construction period of engineering project based on labor balance under resource tolerance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Kyunghwan Kim, 2020. "Generalized Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method to Improve Sustainability in Construction Project Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Irina Zamfirache, 2023. "Entomophagy—Acceptance or Hesitancy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Mohammad Ajmal Nikjow & Li Liang & Xijing Qi & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Triggers of Delays in International Projects Using Engineering Procurement and Construction Delivery Methods in the Belt and Road Initiative: Case Study of a High-Speed Railway Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Robert Lee Cavazos & Keelyn Taylor & R. Brandon Eary & Scott Doty, 2022. "Institutional and Individual Effects of Greenwashing on Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Akrivi Krouska & Katerina Kabassi & Christos Troussas & Cleo Sgouropoulou, 2022. "Personalizing Environmental Awareness through Smartphones Using AHP and PROMETHEE II," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Xuesong Li & Yunlong Ding & Yuxuan Li, 2019. "M-Government Cooperation for Sustainable Development in China: A Transaction Cost and Resource-Based View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Raquel P. F. Guiné & João Duarte & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Nada M. Boustani & Ilija Djekic & Elena Bartkiene & Marijana Matec Sarić & Maria Papageorgiou & Malgorzata Korzeniowska & Patricia Combarr, 2023. "Validation of the Scale Knowledge and Perceptions about Edible Insects through Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Przemysław Rajca & Andrzej Skibiński & Anna Biniek-Poskart & Monika Zajemska, 2022. "Review of Selected Determinants Affecting Use of Municipal Waste for Energy Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Christina Emmanouil & Kalliopi Papadopoulou & Iliana Papamichael & Antonis A. Zorpas, 2022. "Pay-as-You-Throw (PAYT) for Municipal Solid Waste Management in Greece: On Public Opinion and Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Maria Papoui-Evangelou & Bogdana Nosova & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Smart ‘Tourist Cities’ Revisited: Culture-Led Urban Sustainability and the Global Real Estate Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Qian Gong & Yushan Duan & Fengtao Guo, 2021. "Disaster Risk Reduction Education in School Geography Curriculum: Review and Outlook from a Perspective of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Aparajita Banerjee & Enda Murphy & Patrick Paul Walsh, 2020. "Perceptions of Multistakeholder Partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Irish Non-State Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Junlong Peng & Chao Peng & Mengyao Wang & Ke Hu & Dubin Wu, 2022. "Research on the factors of extremely short construction period under the sufficient resources based on Grey-DEMATEL-ISM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5380-:d:1100656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.