IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9299-d1166862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entomophagy—Acceptance or Hesitancy in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Zamfirache

    (Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study analyzes the attitudes and perceptions of Romanian individuals regarding entomophagy, which is the practice of eating insects, with the explicit purpose of finding out the factors that influence acceptance and hesitancy using a questionnaire with 470 respondents. The study tackles various issues related to insect consumption, current eating habits, shopping habits, culture and tradition, the willingness and curiosity to try new foods, nutritional aspects, environment, knowledge about current events, and sustainability. The acceptance of insects as food, although studied more and more in the last few years, still has more questions than answers. Neophobia is part of the explanation, but so are the cultural determinants. The people who make the decisions could be an important matter, so targeting the decision makers with specific campaigns could make them more open to try new foods. Out of the factors that influence food choices, the top three answers were: taste, whether the food is perceived as healthy or not, and the price, so palatability is the most important aspect. Knowledge is another key factor that has to be improved, as most respondents do not have proper information about the benefits or the positive aspects of eating insects.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Zamfirache, 2023. "Entomophagy—Acceptance or Hesitancy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9299-:d:1166862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corina Zugravu & Monica Tarcea & Mirela Nedelescu & Daniela Nuţă & Raquel P. F. Guiné & Ciprian Constantin, 2023. "Knowledge: A Factor for Acceptance of Insects as Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Oliva M. D. Martins & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Jasmina Bašić & Ana Sofia Coelho & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2022. "Insect-Based Food: A (Free) Choice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Ofélia Anjos & Nada M. Boustani & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Marijana Matek Sarić & Manuela Ferreira & Cristina A. Costa & Elena Bartkiene & Ana P. Cardoso & M, 2022. "Are Consumers Aware of Sustainability Aspects Related to Edible Insects? Results from a Study Involving 14 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Kathrin Specht & Felix Zoll & Henrike Schümann & Julia Bela & Julia Kachel & Marcel Robischon, 2019. "How Will We Eat and Produce in the Cities of the Future? From Edible Insects to Vertical Farming—A Study on the Perception and Acceptability of New Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Vilma Halonen & Ville Uusitalo & Jarkko Levänen & Jani Sillman & Lauri Leppäkoski & Anna Claudelin, 2022. "Recognizing Potential Pathways to Increasing the Consumption of Edible Insects from the Perspective of Consumer Acceptance: Case Study from Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Valerie J. Stull & Mukata Wamulume & Mwangala I. Mwalukanga & Alisad Banda & Rachel S. Bergmans & Michael M. Bell, 2018. "“We like insects here”: entomophagy and society in a Zambian village," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(4), pages 867-883, December.
    7. Carolyn Beans, 2022. "How to convince people to eat insects," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(46), pages 2217537119-, November.
    8. Vyacheslav Dolganyuk & Stanislav Sukhikh & Olga Kalashnikova & Svetlana Ivanova & Egor Kashirskikh & Alexander Prosekov & Philippe Michaud & Olga Babich, 2023. "Food Proteins: Potential Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karolina Szulc, 2023. "Edible Insects: A Study of the Availability of Insect-Based Food in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Juliet Akola & James Chakwizira & Emaculate Ingwani & Peter Bikam, 2023. "Awareness Level of Spatial Planning Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction in Informal Settlements in Mopani District, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Oliva M. D. Martins & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Ana Sofia Coelho & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2022. "Sensory Perception Nudge: Insect-Based Food Consumer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Garrett M. Broad & Wythe Marschall & Maya Ezzeddine, 2022. "Perceptions of high-tech controlled environment agriculture among local food consumers: using interviews to explore sense-making and connections to good food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 417-433, March.
    5. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Theodora Karanisa & Yasmine Achour & Ahmed Ouammi & Sami Sayadi, 2022. "Smart greenhouses as the path towards precision agriculture in the food-energy and water nexus: case study of Qatar," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 521-546, December.
    7. Zabentungwa T. Hlongwane & Rob Slotow & Thinandavha C. Munyai, 2021. "The Role of Edible Insects in Rural Livelihoods, and Identified Challenges in Vhembe District, Limpopo, South Africa," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Larisa Ivascu & David Frank Ahimaz & Benedict Valentine Arulanandam & Gelu-Ovidiu Tirian, 2021. "The Perception and Degree of Adoption by Urbanites towards Urban Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Leocardia Ranga & Francesco Noci & Maria Dermiki, 2024. "Insect-Based Foods: A Preliminary Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Affecting Acceptance and New Product Development Ideas through Focus Groups," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Adrián Csordás & István Füzesi, 2023. "The Impact of Technophobia on Vertical Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Mina, Giorgio & Peira, Giovanni & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2023. "Public perception and social sustainability of indoor farming technologies: A systematic review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Raquel P. F. Guiné & João Duarte & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Nada M. Boustani & Ilija Djekic & Elena Bartkiene & Marijana Matec Sarić & Maria Papageorgiou & Malgorzata Korzeniowska & Patricia Combarr, 2023. "Validation of the Scale Knowledge and Perceptions about Edible Insects through Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Jost Buscher & Julija Bakunowitsch & Kathrin Specht, 2023. "Transformative Potential of Vertical Farming—An Urban Planning Investigation Using Multi-Level Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Madita Amoneit & Dagmara Weckowska & Myriam Preiss & Annette Biedermann & Leon Gellrich & Carsten Dreher & Monika Schreiner, 2024. "Public Perceptions of Alternative Protein Sources: Implications for Responsible Agrifood Transition Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Yilong Hao & Kai Ding & Yaoyang Xu & Yuting Tang & Dong Liu & Gang Li, 2020. "States, Trends, and Future of Aquaponics Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Marilyne Chicoine & Francine Rodier & Fabien Durif, 2023. "The bright and the dark side of commercial urban agriculture labeling," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1153-1170, September.
    18. Mihaela Hăbeanu & Anca Gheorghe & Teodor Mihalcea, 2023. "Silkworm Bombyx mori —Sustainability and Economic Opportunity, Particularly for Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9299-:d:1166862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.