IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5058-d1095668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Crafting, Job Boredom and Generational Diversity: Are Millennials Different from Gen Xs?

Author

Listed:
  • Harun Sesen

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, Nicosia 99258, Turkey)

  • Ama Asantewaa Donkor

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, European University of Lefke, Gemikonagi 99728, Turkey)

Abstract

The current working environment requires employees to have some control over their jobs. Drawing on the job demands–resource (JD-R) theory, we investigated the relationship between job crafting and job boredom. Based on the generational cohort theory, we determined the strength of the relationship using generational diversity as a moderator. Data from 320 participants employed in white-collar jobs in the private sector were collected over two time periods. Structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression were used in the analysis. The results of this study show that job crafting has a significant negative impact on job boredom. This effect is further differentiated by generational differences, that is, belonging to Gen X or the Millennial cohorts. The use of self-administered questionnaires may result in the selection of ‘socially desired’ outcomes. This study has implications for today’s intergenerational environment, since different generational groups have different attributes, priorities, desires and motivations that impact their actions. This study adds to the limited research on the impact of job crafting on job boredom. However, this is the first study to examine the moderating effect of Gen X and Millennials on the relationship between job crafting and boredom. As a result, appropriate incentives can be implemented to encourage crafting among generational cohorts within organizations, especially with the entry of Generation Z into the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Harun Sesen & Ama Asantewaa Donkor, 2023. "Job Crafting, Job Boredom and Generational Diversity: Are Millennials Different from Gen Xs?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5058-:d:1095668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lotta Harju & Jari J. Hakanen & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2016. "Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? : A three-year cross-lagged panel study," Post-Print hal-02312426, HAL.
    2. Costanza, David P. & Finkelstein, Lisa M., 2015. "Generationally Based Differences in the Workplace: Is There a There There?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 308-323, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gustavo Adolfo García & Diego René Gonzales Miranda & Oscar Gallo & Juan Pablo Roman Calderon, 2020. "Millennials and the gender wage gap: Do millennial women face a glass ceiling?," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 18409, Universidad EAFIT.
    2. Yuhyung Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Kyungdo Park & Hansol Hwang, 2020. "How Managers’ Job Crafting Reduces Turnover Intention: The Mediating Roles of Role Ambiguity and Emotional Exhaustion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Klopotan Igor & Aleksić Ana & Vinković Nikolina, 2020. "Do Business Ethics and Ethical Decision Making Still Matter: Perspective of Different Generational Cohorts," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 31-43, March.
    4. Piia Seppälä & Lotta Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Ahmet Alkan Çelik & Mert Kılıç & Erkut Altındağ & Volkan Öngel & Ayşe Günsel, 2021. "Does the Reflection of Foci of Commitment in Job Performance Weaken as Generations Get Younger? A Comparison between Gen X and Gen Y Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Vishal Gupta & Shailendra Singh & Abhijit Bhattacharya, 2017. "The Relationships Between Leadership, Work Engagement And Employee Innovative Performance: Empirical Evidence From The Indian R&D Context," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Hazem Ali & Min Li & Xunmin Qiu, 2024. "Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Kamal Badar & Karin Lasthuizen, 2023. "Twenty Years of Research on Millennials at Work : A Structural Review Using Bibliometric and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Piia Seppälä & Lotta K. Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," Post-Print hal-03188191, HAL.
    10. Karatepe, Osman M. & Kim, Taegoo Terry, 2020. "Investigating the selected consequences of boreout among cabin crew," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Teresa Kupczyk & Elwira Gross-Golacka & Piotr Rupa, 2023. "Level of Fulfilment of Expectations towards Work and Employer of Generation Z Employees," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 988-1001.
    12. Basil John Thomas & Tarek Khalil & Nisha Joseph, 2020. "The Role of Educational Technologies in CSR Perception of Tourism Education: The Comparative Analysis of E-Learning and M-Learning Tools as Moderators," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Min-Chien Tsai & Sy-Feng Wang & Nicola J. Gray & Didier Jourdan, 2022. "Occupational Health of Education Personnel—The Role of Job Crafting and Other Control Strategies on Healthy Ageing at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Enrique Robledo & Salvatore Zappalà & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Job Crafting as a Mediator between Work Engagement and Wellbeing Outcomes: A Time-Lagged Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Banta Karollah & Yuli Monita & Vilzati Vilzati & Muhammad Muhammad & Mahdani Ibrahim, 2020. "The practice of job crafting and its impact on job outcomes: An empirical study," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 192-199, September.
    16. Patrycja Palen-Tondel & Alicja Smolbik-Jeczmien, 2021. "Looking for a Fulcrum- Are Preferred Work Values Different for Four Generation Cohorts Co-existing in the Labour Market of Poland?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 102-119.
    17. Anisoara MELNIC, 2022. "Generational Theories As A Way Of Understanding The Structure Of Work Potential," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 7(2), pages 74-79.
    18. Nikita Bosa & Trevor Ncamiso Mtetwa, 2023. "An investigation into the job Design of construction managers and its impact on employee engagement," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 40(1), pages 288-298, February.
    19. Weiwei Shang, 2022. "The Effects of Job Crafting on Job Performance among Ideological and Political Education Teachers: The Mediating Role of Work Meaning and Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Yanan Dong & Limei Zhang & Hai-Jiang Wang & Jing Jiang, 2023. "Why is Crafting the Job Associated with Less Prosocial Reactions and More Social Undermining? The Role of Feelings of Relative Deprivation and Zero-Sum Mindset," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 175-190, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5058-:d:1095668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.