IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v8y2015i03p308-323_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generationally Based Differences in the Workplace: Is There a There There?

Author

Listed:
  • Costanza, David P.
  • Finkelstein, Lisa M.

Abstract

Stereotypes about generational differences in the workplace abound, and interventions for helping organizations and managers to deal with these supposed differences are increasing. In addition to popular press articles describing the differences and extolling the practices and strategies to deal with them, there are a growing number of researchers who are attempting to establish that there are such differences. Overall, however, there is little solid empirical evidence supporting generationally based differences and almost no theory behind why such differences should even exist. The purposes of this focal article are to explore the myths surrounding generations, to review the risks in using generations in organizational decisions, and to make recommendations for practitioners and researchers on how to proceed in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Costanza, David P. & Finkelstein, Lisa M., 2015. "Generationally Based Differences in the Workplace: Is There a There There?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 308-323, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:8:y:2015:i:03:p:308-323_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942615000152/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teresa Kupczyk & Elwira Gross-Golacka & Piotr Rupa, 2023. "Level of Fulfilment of Expectations towards Work and Employer of Generation Z Employees," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 988-1001.
    2. Basil John Thomas & Tarek Khalil & Nisha Joseph, 2020. "The Role of Educational Technologies in CSR Perception of Tourism Education: The Comparative Analysis of E-Learning and M-Learning Tools as Moderators," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Ting Zhang & Zoltan Acs, 2018. "Age and entrepreneurship: nuances from entrepreneur types and generation effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 773-809, December.
    4. Gustavo Adolfo García & Diego René Gonzales Miranda & Oscar Gallo & Juan Pablo Roman Calderon, 2020. "Millennials and the gender wage gap: Do millennial women face a glass ceiling?," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 18409, Universidad EAFIT.
    5. Kim, Sungdoo, 2018. "Managing millennials’ personal use of technology at work," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 261-270.
    6. Ruiying Xiong & Kim Spaccarotella & Virginia Quick & Carol Byrd-Bredbenner, 2019. "Generational Differences: A Comparison of Weight-Related Cognitions and Behaviors of Generation X and Millennial Mothers of Preschool Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Maria Christina Meyers & Dorien Kooij & Brigitte Kroon & Renee Reuver & Marianne Woerkom, 2020. "Organizational Support for Strengths Use, Work Engagement, and Contextual Performance: The Moderating Role of Age," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 485-502, April.
    8. Harun Sesen & Ama Asantewaa Donkor, 2023. "Job Crafting, Job Boredom and Generational Diversity: Are Millennials Different from Gen Xs?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Marcus, Justin & Carlson, David & Ergin, Canan & Ceylan, Savas, 2022. "“Generation Me”: An intra-nationally bounded generational explanation for convergence and divergence in personal vs. social focus cultural value orientations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(2).
    10. Sait Gurbuz & Ihsan Aytekin, 2020. "PAre Work Attitudes of Generations Myth or Real? Evidence from the United States and Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 49(2), pages 248-270, November.
    11. Patrycja Palen-Tondel & Alicja Smolbik-Jeczmien, 2021. "Looking for a Fulcrum- Are Preferred Work Values Different for Four Generation Cohorts Co-existing in the Labour Market of Poland?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 102-119.
    12. Klopotan Igor & Aleksić Ana & Vinković Nikolina, 2020. "Do Business Ethics and Ethical Decision Making Still Matter: Perspective of Different Generational Cohorts," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 31-43, March.
    13. Kamal Badar & Karin Lasthuizen, 2023. "Twenty Years of Research on Millennials at Work : A Structural Review Using Bibliometric and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Hazem Ali & Min Li & Xunmin Qiu, 2024. "Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Müge Leyla YILDIZ & Selay GİRAY YAKUT, 2019. "İşyerinde Etik Algısı Cinsiyete ve Kuşaklara Göre Değişir mi? Türkiye’deki Çalışanlar Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 197-217, November.
    16. Ahmet Alkan Çelik & Mert Kılıç & Erkut Altındağ & Volkan Öngel & Ayşe Günsel, 2021. "Does the Reflection of Foci of Commitment in Job Performance Weaken as Generations Get Younger? A Comparison between Gen X and Gen Y Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Anisoara MELNIC, 2022. "Generational Theories As A Way Of Understanding The Structure Of Work Potential," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 7(2), pages 74-79.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:8:y:2015:i:03:p:308-323_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.