IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4959-d1093783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Circular Economy: Unveiling Heterogeneous Effects of Government Policy Stringency, Environmentally Related Innovation, and Human Capital within OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Ebo Arthur

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, 53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Solomon Gyamfi

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, 53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Wolfgang Gerstlberger

    (School of Business and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Jan Stejskal

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, 53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Viktor Prokop

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, 53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

With reference to the existing literature, this paper investigates the heterogenous effect on the attainment of circular economy by government policies in the form of government stringency and government financial support, environmentally related innovations, and human capital. The study was carried out in 26 countries of the OECD from 2010–2019 using the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood (PPML) model and data from Eurostat and OECD datasets. Indicators for the independent variables were non-market-based stringency, market-based subsidy, gross domestic expenditure on R&D by source of funds, R&D expenditure intramural, national expenditure on environmental protection environmental protection, environmentally related patents with co-inventors, and employees involved in education and training. The results revealed that a significant effect of government stringency in the form of non-market-based stringency, environmental innovation, government financing on R&D, and national expenditure on environmental protection have significant impact on the attainment of circular economy within OECD countries. Surprisingly, there was no significant effect of the market-based subsidy on domestic material consumption (dmc). We conclude that a blend of government policies is the effective means of achieving a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Ebo Arthur & Solomon Gyamfi & Wolfgang Gerstlberger & Jan Stejskal & Viktor Prokop, 2023. "Towards Circular Economy: Unveiling Heterogeneous Effects of Government Policy Stringency, Environmentally Related Innovation, and Human Capital within OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4959-:d:1093783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4959/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4959/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Davide Antonioli & Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Nicolli, 2016. "Firm Surveys relating Environmental Policies, Environmental Performance and Innovation: Design Challenges and insights from Empirical Application," OECD Environment Working Papers 103, OECD Publishing.
    2. Claudia Ghisetti & Sandro Montresor, 2020. "On the adoption of circular economy practices by small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs): does “financing-as-usual” still matter?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 559-586, April.
    3. Miguelez, Ernest, 2019. "Collaborative patents and the mobility of knowledge workers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 62-74.
    4. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Anil Kumar & Syed Mithun Ali & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Razia Sultana & Jafar Rezaei, 2020. "Critical success factors for a circular economy: Implications for business strategy and the environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3611-3635, December.
    5. Moundigbaye, Mantobaye & Rea, William S. & Reed, W. Robert, 2018. "Which panel data estimator should I use? A corrigendum and extension," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-31.
    6. Enrico Maria de Angelis & Marina Di Giacomo & Davide Vannoni, 2019. "Climate Change and Economic Growth: The Role of Environmental Policy Stringency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Prokop, Viktor & Hajek, Petr & Stejskal, Jan, 2021. "Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Mihail Busu, 2019. "Adopting Circular Economy at the European Union Level and Its Impact on Economic Growth," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, May.
    9. Faheem Gul Gilal & Zubaida Ashraf & Naeem Gul Gilal & Rukhsana Gul Gilal & Nisar Ahmed Channa, 2019. "Promoting environmental performance through green human resource management practices in higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1579-1590, November.
    10. Cristian Silviu Banacu & Mihail Busu & Raluca Ignat & Carmen Lenuta Trica, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Innovation Impact on Recycling Municipal Waste. A Panel Data Analysis at the EU Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Victor Motta, 2019. "Estimating Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood rather than log-linear model of a log-transformed dependent variable," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 508-518, September.
    12. Jean Andrei & Mihai Mieila & Gheorghe H. Popescu & Elvira Nica & Manole Cristina, 2016. "The Impact and Determinants of Environmental Taxation on Economic Growth Communities in Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    13. Usman, Ojonugwa & Alola, Andrew Adewale & Akadiri, Seyi Saint, 2022. "Effects of domestic material consumption, renewable energy, and financial development on environmental sustainability in the EU-28: Evidence from a GMM panel-VAR," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 239-251.
    14. Banjo Roxas, 2022. "Eco‐innovations of firms: A longitudinal analysis of the roles of industry norms and proactive environmental strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 515-531, January.
    15. R. De Santis & P. Esposito & C. Jona Lasinio, 2021. "Environmental regulation and productivity growth: Main policy challenges," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 165, pages 264-277.
    16. Grazia Cecere & Nicoletta Corrocher, 2016. "Stringency of regulation and innovation in waste management: an empirical analysis on EU countries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 625-646, October.
    17. Xie, Rong-hui & Yuan, Yi-jun & Huang, Jing-jing, 2017. "Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on “Green” Productivity: Evidence from China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 104-112.
    18. Luca Marrucci & Fabio Iannone & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2022. "Antecedents of absorptive capacity in the development of circular economy business models of small and medium enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 532-544, January.
    19. Salvatore Ercolano & Oriana Romano, 2018. "Spending for the Environment: General Government Expenditure Trends in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 1145-1169, August.
    20. Sergio Correia & Paulo Guimarães & Tom Zylkin, 2020. "Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 20(1), pages 95-115, March.
    21. Jana Hojnik & Viktor Prokop & Jan Stejskal, 2022. "R&D as bridge to sustainable development? Case of Czech Republic and Slovenia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 146-160, January.
    22. Olmos, Luis & Ruester, Sophia & Liong, Siok-Jen, 2012. "On the selection of financing instruments to push the development of new technologies: Application to clean energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 252-266.
    23. Du, Kerui & Li, Pengzhen & Yan, Zheming, 2019. "Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 297-303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanshan Li & Zhengjun Hu, 2024. "The Impact of the Circular Economy Pilot Policy on Carbon Emissions in Chinese Cities and Its Underlying Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Carina Pasqualotto & Daniela Callegaro-De-Menezes & Cornelius Stephanus Lodewyk Schutte, 2023. "An Overview and Categorization of the Drivers and Barriers to the Adoption of the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Buggle & Thierry Mayer & Seyhun Orcan Sakalli & Mathias Thoenig, 2023. "The Refugee’s Dilemma: Evidence from Jewish Migration out of Nazi Germany," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 1273-1345.
    2. Alex Hollingsworth & Krzysztof Karbownik & Melissa A. Thomasson & Anthony Wray, 2024. "The Gift of a Lifetime: The Hospital, Modern Medicine, and Mortality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(7), pages 2201-2238, July.
    3. Magnus Lodefalk & Fredrik Sjöholm & Aili Tang, 2022. "International trade and labour market integration of immigrants," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1650-1689, June.
    4. Beniamino Quintieri & Giovanni Stamato, 2023. "Are preferential agreements beneficial to EU trade? New evidence from the EU–South Korea treaty," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3511-3541, December.
    5. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Hiroshi Mukunoki, 2023. "The magnification effect in global value chains," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 141-157, February.
    6. Balša Ćulafić & Martin Gaber & Mahdi Ghodsi & Belma Hasić & Muela Ibrahimi & Branimir Jovanović & Sophia Kluge & Ognjenka Lalović & Marko Mandić & Ravik Mima & Sanja Nikolova & Antoaneta Manova Stavre, 2021. "Getting Stronger After COVID-19: Nearshoring Potential in the Western Balkans," wiiw Research Reports 453, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    7. Mahdi Ghodsi & Robert Stehrer, 2022. "Trade policy and global value chains: tariffs versus non-tariff measures," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(3), pages 887-916, August.
    8. J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2022. "The Log of Gravity at 15," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(3), pages 423-437, September.
    9. Sandro Provenzano & Sefi Roth & Lutz Sager, 2024. "Air Pollution and Respiratory Infectious Diseases," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(5), pages 1127-1139, May.
    10. Yvonne Wolfmayr & Elisabeth Christen & Hendrik Mahlkow & Birgit Meyer & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2024. "Trade and Welfare Effects of New Trade Policy Instruments," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 70732, April.
    11. Colin A. Carter & Sandro Steinbach, 2020. "The Impact of Retaliatory Tariffs on Agricultural and Food Trade," NBER Working Papers 27147, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "A micro-macro model of foreign direct investment: knowledge-based gravity forces, self-selection and third-country effects," MPRA Paper 115542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Eva Mihaliková & Marcela Taušová & Katarína Čulková, 2022. "Public Expenses and Investment in Environmental Protection and Its Impact on Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Shon M. Ferguson, 2023. "Unconstrained trade: The impact of EU cage bans on exports of poultry‐keeping equipment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 435-449, June.
    16. Natalie Chen & Dennis Novy, 2022. "Gravity and Heterogeneous Trade Cost Elasticities," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(644), pages 1349-1377.
    17. Luisa Kinzius & Alexander Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2019. "Trade protection and the role of non-tariff barriers," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(4), pages 603-643, November.
    18. Federico Carril-Caccia & Jordi Paniagua & Rafael Francisco Requena, 2021. "Asylum Migration, Borders and Terrorism in a Structural Gravity Model," Working Papers 2108, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    19. Pham, Tho & Talavera, Oleksandr & Wu, Zhuangchen, 2023. "Labor markets during war time: Evidence from online job advertisements," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 1316-1333.
    20. Juan de Lucio & Raúl Mínguez & Asier Minondo & Francisco Requena, 2024. "Reducing trade with Russia: Sanctions vs. reputation," Working Papers 2406, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4959-:d:1093783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.